Anthony Rose (@anthonyrose) header
Anthony Rose (@anthonyrose) profile picture

Founder & CEO SeedLegals, the largest closer of funding rounds in the UK. Now in the US. The man behind the BBC iPlayer.

London
Joined August 2008
Photo by Anthony Rose (@anthonyrose)Photo by Anthony Rose (@anthonyrose)Photo by Anthony Rose (@anthonyrose)Photo by Anthony Rose (@anthonyrose)Photo by Anthony Rose (@anthonyrose)Photo by Anthony Rose (@anthonyrose)Photo by Anthony Rose (@anthonyrose)Photo by Anthony Rose (@anthonyrose)Photo by Anthony Rose (@anthonyrose)Photo by Anthony Rose (@anthonyrose)
Anthony Rose retweeted
Blocking UK users is actually counterproductive from a law enforcement POV. The users still get to you, only via VPN or Tor. For those, much of the available data for e.g. a search warrant will be garbage. What Ofcom describes as a "win" for safety is in fact a massive L
This is meant to be about how Ofcom can issue but cannot collect fines against firms. But my biggest takeaway is her comment around it being good that services have blocked UK users. Before the Online Safety Act became law, we were repeatedly told that Ofcom wouldn’t become an internet censor but that’s precisely what’s happened.
13
48
392
11,895
Anthony Rose retweeted
This says it all, frankly! h/t @sebs_tweets
99
483
45
1,857
145,734
Ofcom should be abolished and all of its staff sacked. It's difficult to understand how anyone could, in good conscience, work for such a vile censorship organisation. Perhaps some of them are quasi-Bolsheviks who think the state should tightly restrict freedom of speech.
39
254
7
1,578
15,616
Anthony Rose retweeted
Ofcom's visible defeat in the 4chan enforcement has begun to shift public debate beyond the UK, with New Zealand think tanks describing potential new censorship measures there as potentially "futile." What we do in America affects the whole world. nzinitiative.org.nz/reports-…
21
105
704
8,944
Have you seen the UK government's new Founder Relief proposal? No CGT on your first £10M on an exit. Sweet! But read it in detail. Your company is unlikely to qualify, and you should assume that it will not apply to you. To recap: Once upon a time, there was Entrepreneurs Relief. If you had more than 5% equity in a company, then you paid only 10% capital gains tax when you sold your shares, up to a lifetime value of £10M. That was sweet! Then the government changed the rules, renamed it to BADR (though Worser would have been more appropriate) and cut the lifetime limit to £1M. In today's budget, they've reduced the BADR limit to just £500k - which as a tax benefit is minuscule. To compensate, they brought out a fabulous-sounding new Founders Relief - consultation paper link below. When you start reading it, it looks great. It applies to founders who've got more than 25% equity at any point in the company's life, which probably means if your company's got 3 founders or fewer, you probably qualify. But then it goes into such a convoluted maze of growth, revenue, and R&D requirements that few companies are ultimately going to qualify. And that's really the thing that makes it useless, because the whole point of such a relief is that, as a founder, when you're weighing up the pros and cons of building a business in the UK versus, for example, moving to the US, you see at the outset that, great, I'm going to pay only 10% CGT on my shares. But here, there is so much uncertainty that there's no way you can bank that as a benefit, and so ultimately it fails its key purpose, which is to drive decision-making for an early-stage founder to build and stay in the UK. So, fabulous work by Startup Coalition and Dom Hallas on getting this and the other package of founder benefits that they've managed to get into the budget at a time when that must have been an incredibly hard uphill climb with the government. I'd love it if this benefit was something that founders could bank on at the outset, but it's not. So I'm looking forward to using the consultation period to turn this into something deterministic rather than having the same chance as a lottery ticket. assets.publishing.service.go…
30
23
7
237
24,213
Anthony Rose retweeted
Cancel your plans for tomorrow. If you are an early-stage founder in NYC about to raise, you have to come to Wilson. @anthonyrose, CEO of @seedlegals, is doing one-on-one office hours at The Wilson, with Propel and in partnership with Wayo. What you can bring: - ​Your pitch deck ​- Your fundraising questions, big or small ​- A term sheet you want a founder-friendly read on ​ You’ll leave with: Anthony's take on what you brought, and a clearer idea of what to sort out first. Register here: luma.com/5g4kolnf
1
4
13
667
There are some fantastic free in-person @SeedLegals events in NYC this week, all themed around conquering your fears about presenting in front of others, getting confident on stage, creating a brilliant pitch, and raising investment. Look forward to seeing you there! Tue 27th 6PM @ Fabrik DUMBO Founder Pitch Clinic with Anthony Rose & Dave Wolovsky Interactive masterclass to help you conquer your nerves, get confident on stage and deliver an awesome pitch. luma.com/dehgirvb?tk=uNDrLr Wed 28th 6PM @ 26 Broadway, downtown Plug and Play & SeedLegals: Pitching Masterclass Do a 3-minute pitch to Plug & Play and SeedLegals, get immediate feedback, watch and cheer others. luma.com/w6eyybfk?tk=GsCR3l Thu 29th 10AM @ The Wilson, Chelsea SeedLegals Power Hours with Anthony X Wayo 1-on-1 office hours with Anthony Rose, CEO of SeedLegals. Bring your pitch deck, website, fundraising questions, ask me anything. luma.com/5g4kolnf Fri 30th 1PM @ Edge Studios, 45th St Your Investor Pitch: what to say & how to say it. A free, two-hour workshop for founders who want to build a stronger investor pitch and deliver it with confidence. luma.com/xkp2ppvs
2
2
259
Fundraising is broken. Founders have an idea, tell investors they're raising $500K to fund the next 18 months. Investors wire their entire amount up front without any idea of whether it'll take off. But founders don't need $500k. If they had $50k a month, that would be awesome. So founders struggle to raise because they're asking too much, and investors lose their investment by giving it all up front rather than based on validation and traction. Welcome to Steadily, the milestone-based fundraising platform. gosteadily.lovable.app And introducing the Steadily SAFE, the world's first milestone-based SAFE investment instrument. ☝ Before you get too excited, everything above is a concept we put together at a hackathon in New York today. Thanks to vibe coding, in the space of 5 hours, we came up with a concept, made a Lovable web page, and built an actual working app. Well, mostly working. If enough people like this, we'll go and build it! Thanks to Hunter Peress, Paula Bejarano, Femi Palmer & Shubh Khandhadia who collectively brainstormed and built this together with me at Deal Flow: NYC's First VC Hackathon here in New York, arranged by the amazing Somya Gupta.
5
5
250
Anthony Rose retweeted
Every time age verification is asked for, a new VPN user is born💫
🇬🇧A University of Edinburgh study found UK VPN-related discussions increased by 145% around the introduction of age checks in July 2025. Government: "This is for your protection" People: "Let me get some privacy protection" Every time age verification is asked for, a new VPN user is born💫
5
12
104
4,506
When the Online Safety Act was introduced to Parliament by the last Conservative government, it was presented as an important tool to protect children from online harms. Since then, it has done anything but. Ofcom has even shown extraterritorial ambitions, infringing on the free speech rights of American citizens and unfairly targeting US businesses. Ofcom’s own figures show that the Act has had no impact on the harmful content children can access online since the children’s safety duties came into force in July 2025. Ofcom said: “We have not observed any significant changes in the incidence or severity of any kind of content over the first nine months after the children’s safety duties came into force.” Now ministers want to ban under-16s from using social media. These online censorship measures are clearly failing to achieve their stated aim. It raises the question: was this ever really about protecting children — or was there something more sinister at play? Read more below from @GuidoFawkes 👇
29
320
14
938
17,061
⚠️The #OnlineSafetyAct is a total failure. The UK’s online safety regulator found “no significant change in children seeing harmful content” since the Act came into force. We warned the Act wasn’t fit for purpose. Brits now have more censorship & less freedom online.
23
143
5
373
5,702
Anthony Rose retweeted
Online Safety Act a failure. Colour me unexpected. Who could have predicted this?
🚨NEW: The Online Safety Act has been a failure, according to a new report from Ofcom. Ofcom have found "no significant change" in children encountering harmful content since the law came into effect last July. This is despite the signifigant threats to free speech and privacy.
16
21
3
161
3,627
Anthony Rose retweeted
Absolutely damning. The UK’s Online Safety Act is not only a censor’s charter, it’s a total failure - our YouGov poll showed even most MPs say it should be repealed or reformed. Yet, here come more policies to ruin the internet. Next: passports to get online, spyware for phones.
🚨NEW: The Online Safety Act has been a failure, according to a new report from Ofcom. Ofcom have found "no significant change" in children encountering harmful content since the law came into effect last July. This is despite the signifigant threats to free speech and privacy.
14
367
4
2,135
26,138
Anthony Rose retweeted
One good comment to the UK Online Safety Act consultation: age verification mandates are exposing UK Internet users to unbelievable levels of opsec and identity theft risk, drive people to the dark web, and could be abused by future govts. From: an actual software developer
14
173
11
873
12,455
Anthony Rose retweeted
🚨NEW: The Online Safety Act has been a failure, according to a new report from Ofcom. Ofcom have found "no significant change" in children encountering harmful content since the law came into effect last July. This is despite the signifigant threats to free speech and privacy.
226
1,560
427
12,448
542,474
Anthony Rose retweeted
A schoolteacher responds to Parliament's Online Safety Act Inquiry. He writes that it has made "literally no difference" to safety, censored the Internet for adults, "terrible" for user privacy, and is easily circumvented - by children - with no effort. committees.parliament.uk/wri…
7
112
3
566
7,997
Anthony Rose retweeted
The UK Online Safety Act is not going to work. It is pushing the UK in the direction of a Digital ID and Chinese style internet censorship. @anthonyrose interviewed NYM CEO @harryhalpin They talked about why people need VPNs, how NymVPN works and the current landscape of UK internet censorship. ⤵️
The UK government's Online Safety Act is a national embarrassment. If you've been following the news, the UK government, under the guise of protecting children, is trying to force websites to require all UK users to provide passport or other ID in order to access content on those sites. The way this plays out is websites and platforms will pull out of the UK, and then everyone will use a VPN to continue to access them as if they are in a different country. It take seconds to install a VPN, bypasses the government's efforts to control your access to the internet. There's been talk of VPNs being banned, but that can't happen because banks and any number of companies rely on VPNs. More importantly, welcome to the next generation of distributed VPNs. Distributed VPN networks have no central control. And thanks to the code being open-sourced, anybody can create their own VPN network, there'll be thousands of websites you can download a VPN installer from. Next-generation distributed VPNs just killed the Online Safety Act. To explain how current and next-gen distributed VPNs work, I spoke to @harryhalpin, CEO at Switzerland-based @nym , a privacy-first VPN. I admire Harry's passion for protecting the core values of the internet against state control. @prestonjbyrne you can add distributed VPNs to your list of reasons it won't work.
3
19
89
3,232
The UK government's Online Safety Act is a national embarrassment. If you've been following the news, the UK government, under the guise of protecting children, is trying to force websites to require all UK users to provide passport or other ID in order to access content on those sites. The way this plays out is websites and platforms will pull out of the UK, and then everyone will use a VPN to continue to access them as if they are in a different country. It take seconds to install a VPN, bypasses the government's efforts to control your access to the internet. There's been talk of VPNs being banned, but that can't happen because banks and any number of companies rely on VPNs. More importantly, welcome to the next generation of distributed VPNs. Distributed VPN networks have no central control. And thanks to the code being open-sourced, anybody can create their own VPN network, there'll be thousands of websites you can download a VPN installer from. Next-generation distributed VPNs just killed the Online Safety Act. To explain how current and next-gen distributed VPNs work, I spoke to @harryhalpin, CEO at Switzerland-based @nym , a privacy-first VPN. I admire Harry's passion for protecting the core values of the internet against state control. @prestonjbyrne you can add distributed VPNs to your list of reasons it won't work.
3
4
4
16
2,547
You can now get an AI summary of your fundraising and legal documents on @SeedLegals. As part of the rapidly growing set of AI features on SeedLegals, it's now super easy to get a summary of the terms in your documents. You can even ask questions about the document and the deal terms. And if you're an admin on the company, if you want to change anything, just click on the Terms tab to set your preferred terms, and everything will update instantly.
2
1
3
216