The NLP/LLM group at Yale University.

New Haven, CT
Joined September 2022
⚛️ We’ve updated our physics benchmark paper and released code, audit data, and expert-verified solutions! 📄 Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2609.13009 💻 Code & data: github.com/Allliance/physics… 📰 Happy to see our work covered in New Scientist too! newscientist.com/article/259…
New paper: How Good Are Frontier Models at Physics? Expert Re-Grading Reveals Broken Evaluations and Near-Saturation of Leading Benchmarks Frontier models have tackled Navier–Stokes. People naturally wonder, how is their capability for physical sciences? According to today’s benchmarks, frontier models still struggle with physics (e.g. 47.3% with GPT5.6-sol on Humanity Last Exam - Physics component). But that picture did not match physicists' experience using these models. So we did a rigorous analysis of current benchmarks and re-graded their supposed failures with Yale physicists. We found that the problem was often the benchmark and not the model !! When corrected, the models almost saturate all benchmarks, including everyone’s favourite, Humanity Last Exam (physics-part) and Critpt. These failures in turn make AA less reliable as a measure of model’s true capability. For more details, results and analysis check out our preprint: arxiv.org/abs/2609.13009 and blog post: jsous.github.io/blogs/is-phy…
2
1
6
175
Check out our new survey on metacognition and LLM!
Metacognition is increasingly seen as a cornerstone of capable, trustworthy AI. Yet how to define, measure, or improve it in LLMs remains unclear. Our paper presents the first comprehensive overview of this emerging field!👇 📄 arxiv.org/pdf/2607.11881 🔗 github.com/yale-nlp/LLM-Meta…
3
233
Yale NLP retweeted
🔥 New paper alert!! Time to REFLECT: Can We Trust LLM Judges for Evidence-based Research Agents? 🔥 We increasingly trust LLM judges to supervise deep research agents. But can we trust the judges themselves? Turns out: even frontier models score below 50% 😯 Details 🧵👇
1
3
8
573
🔥 New paper alert!! Reinforcement Learning with Metacognitive Feedback Elicits Faithful Uncertainty Expression in LLMs 🔥 Can a model that learns to 𝘫𝘶𝘥𝘨𝘦 𝘪𝘵𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘧 get even better at tasks—and learn to be honest about what it doesn't know? Turns out: yes🤯 Details🧵👇
4
19
5
64
12,021
Also glad to share this was accepted as a ✨spotlight✨to the Trustworthy AI4GOOD Workshop @ #ICML 2026!
🔥Excited to share our paper: Quantifying Faithful Confidence Expression in Large Reasoning Models (LRMs)!🔥 We trust reasoning models partly because they show their work. But do their words reflect how confident they really are? 🤔 Check our preprint to find out! Details 🧵👇
5
1
11
1,797
Looking forward to seeing you today!!
When multimodal AI meets real-world expertise, reasoning gets harder, deeper, and much more exciting. Join us at KnowledgeMR @ #CVPR2026 to push this frontier forward! 🗓️Thu June 4 | 8am | Room 704/706 Speakers: @thoma_gu @huang_biwei @pliang279 @MengdiWang10 @xwang_lk
1
3
385
🔥 Excited to share my new preprint: Can LLMs Use Linguistic Uncertainty Markers to Reliably Reflect Intrinsic Confidence? 🔥 When an LLM says "I think" or "probably," does it actually mean something consistent internally? The answer: not really 😬 Check out details in 🧵(1/n):
3
7
1
26
2,115
Check out our work MetaFaith on LLM faithfulness in uncertainty expression and talk with @pybeebee at #EMNLP2025 this week!!
Traveling to #EMNLP2025 to present our work “MetaFaith: Faithful Natural Language Uncertainty Expression in LLMs” this week! 🇨🇳 Come by & let's chat about LLM faithfulness / uncertainty / calibration! 📍Poster Session 7 @ Hall C3 🗓Fri, Nov 7 @ 2-3:30p 🔗tinyurl.com/metafaith
4
434
📢 Our recent work - NLPBench: Evaluating Large Language Models on Solving NLP Problems arxiv.org/pdf/2309.15630.pdf 🤔 Could LLMs answer college-level NLP questions like a human? We introduce NLPBench, which consists of 378 college-level NLP questions spanning various NLP topics.
2
24
1
76
15,827
🎉@RexYing0923 AosongFeng @dragomir_radev Our recent work accepted at #ACL2023, a hierarchical model for long document classification. We also standardized the benchmark with six existing ones. paper link: arxiv.org/pdf/2305.03319.pdf code link: github.com/IreneZihuiLi/HiPo…
1
4
33
5,600
Yale NLP retweeted
Lastly, I want to thank everyone that I’ve shared a meal, a coffee/drink or even just a conversation. I’m like 96.2% sure that I’m the only one from Yale that’s attending in person this year. Thanks for keeping me company and making me feel I’m not alone. 4/n,n=4 – at Rwanda
1
7
805
Yale NLP retweeted
It’s also amazing how people from different countries and backgrounds can just meet up for the common passion for the local food or hikes, and became friends overnight. 3/n – at Rwanda
1
1
5
665
Yale NLP retweeted
I got to speak with people whose work had huge impact on mine, and ask about their opinions on my ongoing work. I also remember the joy I had when researchers I constantly cite came to my poster and told me they knew me and my work as well. 2/n – at Rwanda
1
1
3
525
Yale NLP retweeted
#ICLR2023 is my first in-person conference post-covid and it’s the most rewarding experience ever. I reunited with my friends, collaborators, mentors… some of which I haven’t seen in years and some I actually met in person for the first time. 1/n – at Rwanda
2
6
63
6,235
Finding 3. The LM "curse of multilinguality" which causes per-language performance to drop as they cover more languages is minimal and inconsistent! They conclude: some of the literature on the curse of multilinguality may need to be revisited using more diverse benchmarks. 4/5
1
1
12
1,244
Background: The Palm paper (arxiv.org/pdf/2204.02311.pdf) found parallel attention+MLP to be 15% faster but degrades quality at models with <8B parameters. 3/5
2
1
9
1,246
These findings from the Pythia paper (arxiv.org/pdf/2304.01373.pdf) by @BlancheMinerva @haileysch__ et al., are fascinating:👇 Finding 1- Deduplication of training data shows no clear benefit, contrary to literature. 1/5 🧵
3
25
1
154
29,021
Salesforce AI #ACL2023 Papers! My Highlights * Socratic Pretraining arxiv.org/pdf/2212.10449.pdf * Robust Summarization Evaluation arxiv.org/pdf/2212.07981.pdf * Constractive Parameter Ensembling arxiv.org/abs/2110.07166 * Did you read the Instruction? * SWIPE: Document Simplification
1
6
31
3,551
Our LongEval paper just received an outstanding paper award at #EACL2023 🏆 LongEval provides a way to improve inter annotator agreement while minimizing annotator workload in challenging task of long form summarization Great work by @kalpeshk2011 and the team! Details below👇
3
2
78
8,314