POLONYA'YI HAZARLAR KURDU
Hazarya, 960'da zayıflamaya başlayınca, önlemler alınır.
Sarkel'den ayrılarak, iki yıl sonra Polonya'yı kurarlar.
Hazarya'dan çok sayıda Yahudi Polonya'ya yerleştirilmeye başlanır.
Yerleşenler arasında, özellikle altın, kürk ve besicilik işleriyle uğraşan çok zengin tüccarlar vardır.
İlk seçilen Hazar kökenli Kralın ismi, hatta 14.yy.'la kadar onun soyundan gelenlerin isimleri bile bellidir.
Günümüzde,kalkıp pek çok video da,kitaplarda Polonya Yahudileri' nin Hazarya`dan gelmediğini yazan,söyleyenler varsa, gülüp geçiniz
Tarihi hakikatlerle yakından uzaktan bir alakası ve tutarlılığı yoktur
Çünkü, Polonya'nın kurucusu onlardır..
Bunu yazanların bir kısmı konudan bihaber,diğerleride sadece hakikati sulandırma vazifelerini icra etmektedirler. Ama uzatmaları oynuyorlar..Bu yüzyıl da Hazar konusu artık kılıfına sığmayan, sığdırılamayan bir mızraktır..
Hazar Tarihi hak ettiği değeri, önce Türk ve Yahudiler arasında, sonra Dünya'da bulacaktır, bundan kuşkunuz olmasın..
Dünya'da, zaten yıllardan beri tüm öğrenci forumlarında ve İtalya'dan, Balkanlar'a hatta Çin'e kadar köşe yazarların yazılarında, korku, endişe ve hayranlıkla konuşuluyordu..
Sadece TV'lere taşınamıyordu.
(Polonya’nın Hazarlar tarafından kurulma hadisesi detayları ile kitabımda mevcut zaten, okuyanlar bilir ..)
Tan Can
I don’t posses the ultimate truth.
My views update as I learn.
I’m here to seek truth, not defend a fixed position.
Each of us is on our own path of discovery, and that requires an active mind: the willingness to separate what’s true from what isn’t, and the discipline to sit with ideas that challenge our current understanding.
A genuine truth-seeker doesn’t dismiss opposing perspectives. They examine them, let the friction refine their thinking, and use the tension of different viewpoints to keep climbing.
That’s the work: stumbling forward with more clarity than before.
Your mind remains the final arbiter.
Always place the responsibility on yourself to verify and clarify anything before accepting it as fact.
The Zodiac Wheel is an ancient cosmic clock.
360 degrees of solar path divided into twelve equal 30-degree signs.
It tracks the Sun’s yearly path and mirrors the structure of consciousness and the body.
It is not a distant sky chart but a living template.
Ancient observers worldwide recorded the same twelve divisions, from early stellar cults that watched the poler stations to the ecliptic system still in use.
The wheel turns with the seasons: the Sun climbs through the spring signs, peaks near the Tropic of Cancer, descends through autumn, and hits its lowest point in Capricorn before climbing again.
Solstices and equinoxes mark the cardinal hinges.
The full cycle is the Great Year of precession, roughly 26,000 years.
Hermetic tradition says that the same twelve-fold pattern exists inside us.
Consciousness projects its own innate archetypes outward; the signs we “see” in the sky are the psyche’s divisions made visible.
Twelve comes naturally from the fourfold modes of awareness (sensation, feeling, thinking, intuition) multiplied by the threefold dynamic of body, mind, and spirit.
Harmonise them and you get the fifth element: wholeness.
The natal chart is not a prediction machine.
It is a compass of the Imperial Self, guiding and forcing the scattered pieces of a life into order.
The wheel is written on the body.
Aries rules the head and cerebrum, Taurus the neck and eyes, Gemini the arms and lungs, and so on down to Pisces at the feet.
Tissue salts, nerve pathways, and organ systems align with the signs, turning medical observation into a practical reflection of celestial order.
Myths and scriptures also encode the journey.
Solar heroes are born, tested, die for three days at the winter solstice, and rise.
Animal symbols (ram, bull, lion, eagle-man) and keywords (lamb, lion of Judah, son of man, beehive honey, milky way) track the Sun through the houses.
From Sumerian tablets to later holy texts, the stories are portable calendars of light and dark, growth and decline.
The Zodiac Wheel is both sky map and inner architecture.
A single pattern that once let anyone carry the year, the body, and the stages of consciousness in one living image.
"Not only do the Gospel writers fail to offer appropriate evidence to substantiate their claims upon the grounds of reasonable probability, but their numerous discrepancies, contradictions, and omissions, their readiness to accept as facts rumours and legends which they had heard at third and fourth hand; their obvious role as reformers, their desire to promote these doctrines and their apparent willingness to even invent stories to promote these doctrines is proof that, instead of being objective historians, they were decidedly propagandists. Indeed, if any subject other than religion were involved, it is extremely doubtful whether any body of thoughtful men would take writings of such men seriously."
— Ernest Busenbark (Symbols, Sex and the Stars)
"Church experts admit to no evidence of the existence of the gospels for at least a century after the time it is said Jesus Christ was born in a manger. The most ancient literature fails to show any trace of acquaintance with, nor the use of, the gospels we know today. It is not possible to find in any writings compiled between the beginning of the First Century, and the middle of the Second Century, any reference to Jesus Christ or the Gospels…"
— Tony Bushby (The Bible Fraud)
"The Dead Sea scrolls made no mention of Jesus Christ or the early Christian Church…It has long been known that there was information in the Dead Sea Scrolls damning to Christians beliefs and the Church’s high level involvement with interpreting them fostered a grave element of suspicion. Since the scrolls were found some six decades ago, close associates of the Vatican were placed in dominant positions in every phase of the investigation and translations of the Scrolls. The priests regulated the flow of information and controlled its release."
— Tony Bushby (The Bible Fraud)
Constantine’s Council of Nicea (Birthplace of official Christianity)
On 21 June, the day of the Summer Solstice, a total of 2048 presbyters, deacons, sub-deacons, acolytes, and exorcists gathered at Nicea to decide what Christianity really was, what it would be, and what writings were to be used and who was to be its god….The Emperor Constantine presided over the council.
"Nowhere is Christianity less attractive…and less authoritative, than in the councils of the church…The degeneracy is rapid from the Council of Nicea (325 AD) to the first of Ephesus (431 AD), where each party came determined to use every means of haste, manoeuvre, court, influence, bribery, to crush his adversary."
— Dean Milman
"After a long and bitter debate, a vote was finally taken and it was with a majority show of hands that Judas Khrestus and Rabbi Jesus both became god - 161 votes to 157. A new god was proclaimed and ‘officially’ ratified by Emperor Constantine.."
— Tony Bushby (The Bible Fraud)
"The Emperor then instructed Bishop Eusebius to compile a uniform collection of new writings “bound together as one,”…Eusebius was to arrange for the production of ‘fifty sumptuous copies…to be written on parchment in a legible manner, and in a convenient portable form, by professional scribes thoroughly accomplished in their art’…’Make them to astonish,’ said Emperor Constantine…This was the first mention of finished copies of the Christian New Testament in the history of mankind."
— Tony Bushby (The Bible Fraud)
"With his instruction now fulfilled, Emperor Constantine decreed that the new writings be thereafter called the ‘words of God’ and be attached…to copies of the Hebrew Old Testament. Emperor Vespasian, in the First Century, had proclaimed the entire Jewish territory the personal property of the Roman Emperors, and his decision was officially ratified by the Senate. In effect, all later Emperors were in control of the Jewish religion…Emperor Constantine effectively attempted to amalgamate the earlier Jewish religion with his new cult. By legal inheritance, he was also the messiah. After Eusebius had finished drawing upon the large array of presbyter’s texts, Constantine then ordered them destroyed by fire and ‘any man found concealing one should be stricken off from his shoulders’ (beheaded)"
— Tony Bushby (The Bible Fraud)
"It is important to note that the format of the name ‘Jesus Christ’ was not cemented down until the time of the Reformation (14th-17th Centuries), for in earlier times it had several renditions such as Yeshoua, Kryst, and Yeshu Kristos."
— Tony Bushby (The Bible fraud)
"The symbol of the cross originated as part of an ancient Egyptian initiatory rite, and eventually found its way into Christianity. It is recorded in Christian archives that the general use of the crucifix was ratified at the Sixth Ecumenical Council in 680… The Council decreed that ‘the figure of a man fastened to a cross be now adopted’ and the new church logo was later confirmed by Emperor Hadrian I (772-95). About a century later, the first pictures of Jesus Christ standing against a cross slowly started to appear."
— Tony Bushby (The secret in the Bible)
Religious scriptures are a registry of astronomical phenomena, written in mythological format.
Modern religious concepts began with astronomy and evolved through mythology and astrology into modern religion.
Many, if not all of the Hebrew myth concepts are traceable to ancient Egypt, Mesopotamia and the West.
Jesus Christ, the “son”-god is a cosmic myth on par with Osiris, Horus, Samson, Adonis, Moses, Abraham, Solomon, Noah, Krishna, Mithra, Quetzalcoatl, and many other solar demigods.
Evidence clearly shows that the 12 apostles are symbols of the zodiac sign and that Jesus Christ symbolises the Sun-God.
It is clear that the tales within the Bible are allegorical depictions of the interactions between elements of the cosmos.
Bible: “submit and be saved.”
Hermes: “Understand and be free.”
They need you dependent.
Hermes doesn’t.
One is a leash with a halo.
The other is the key that makes the leash irrelevant.
Throw the Bible in the bin.
You’ll learn more about God in this 3 hours than the book ever taught.
youtu.be/SiCfWF_mIeU?si=n2LM…
“There was always an exoteric portion of Christianity given out to the world, to the uninitiated, and an esoteric portion reserved for the initiates, and revealed only in degrees, accordingly as the candidate demonstrated his fitness to receive, conceal and rightly use the knowledge so imparted. Few professed Christians are aware, perhaps, that such was the case with Christianity during the early centuries.” — J. D. Buck
In 768, Charlemagne started a 32 year long campaign of what can only be described as genocidal evangelism against the Saxons under his control in western Germany. The campaign started with the cutting down of the Saxon’s most sacred tree, their version of the World Tree….In 772, at Quierzy, he issued a proclamation that he would kill every Saxon who refused to accept Jesus Christ, and from that time on he kept a special detachment of Christian priests who doubled as executioners, and in every Saxon village in which they stopped, these priests would execute anybody who refused to be baptised. Then in 782, at Verden, Charlemagne carried out the act for which he is most notoriously associated - he ordered the beheading of 4,500 Saxons in one day who had made the error of being caught practicing paganism after they had agreed to be Christians. His onsite biographer, the monk Einhard records that after these beheadings: “the king went into winter camp, and there celebrated mass as usual…” — Arthur Kemp
“During the early period of the Christian movement the multitude of often contradictory texts was so great that the young Church saw only one way of preserving the faith from splitting into numerous sects: assembling a canon of writings and destroying rejected apocryphal (hidden) texts.” — The Original Jesus
Large scale editorial control. The aim; Consolidation, a single world government, and a single world religion.
They didn't want independent segregated tribes and natives all believing whatever they want, they couldn’t have that. Instead, they insisted on one God that everyone must worship. To achieve this, they seek to homogenise cultures, beliefs, and practices. Anything that remains discordant or resistant is banned, discarded, or destroyed. What remains is then packed and sold to the public through a carefully managed PR campaign.
“The New Testament writings “were not written by eyewitnesses of an overpowering divine appearance in the midst of human history… the Christian Bible turns out to be a masterpiece of invention… To be quite frank about it, the Bible is the product of very energetic and successful mythmaking on the part of those early Christians.” — Burton L. Mack, Who Wrote the New Testament?
“The words “authorised” and “original,” when applied to the Bible, do not mean “genuine,” “authentic,” or “true.” — Tony Bushby, The Bible Fraud
“The Canon of the New Testament, is nothing more or less than a copy of the mythological histories of the Hindu Savior Krishna, and the Buddhist savior Buddha, with a mixture of mythology borrowed from the Persians and other nations.” — T.W. Doane, Bible Myths and Their Parallels in other Religions.
The result is a tightly curated narrative that became the foundation for a religion capable of empire-scale reach.
“Those initiated into the sacred mysteries knew the Gospel stories were false, but considered it necessary to keep up the imposition for the purpose of propagandism. But while this transition of faith was going on, some of the more conscientious teachers began to tell the people that the Jesus Christ they were worshipping was not a historical personage. This was regarded by the conservative priests as a dangerous disclosure, and so John denounces the innovators as liars and Anti-Christs, knowing that he himself and his fellow priests were the pious liars and that the Anti-Christs we’re telling the truth…Error prevailed, and the mythical Christ became the historical Jesus…” — (Revelations of Antichrist)
Being able to jump in-and-out of different reality tunnels is a superpower. youtu.be/joXjEVVU6Sg?si=qI4L…
..113 retweeted
Replying to @blimpsabe2
I am not an atheist.
I believe in God.
Just not the version the priest caste sold us.
I reject conventional religion and the idea of a separate supernatural God who created the universe from outside it, without reducing reality to mere material processes.
There is a spiritual dimension to existence.
God is the Holy Spirit: Spirit itself, the living consciousness that is the ground of reality.
Your spirit is your consciousness.
The voice you hear within (the one you ordinarily take to be merely your own), is closer to the divine than any distant external deity.
God is not far away or superior in some hierarchical sense; it speaks with you every moment, disguised as yourself.
The numinous quality of the world (the awe of nature, the mystery of existence, the sheer fact of awareness) is what gives rise, over time, to the God-archetype in the human psyche.
Priests externalise that archetype, turn it into an external tyrant, and monopolise access to it.
True divinity is not outside the universe demanding worship.
The universe is inherently creative; it is an expression of Spirit rather than the product of an external craftsman.
Rejecting the God of Christianity does not mean rejecting all spirituality or every possible conception of divinity.
It means reclaiming the inner one.
The self. the Holy. The Spirit.
And recognising that the sacred is immanent in consciousness and in the world itself.
Now in saying that, as a Christian, what version of creation in Genesis do you subscribe to, given that both cannot be literally true?
Contradictions in the Bible:
Creation accounts (Genesis)
Two creation narratives differ in order, method, and details: Genesis 1 (Elohim; structured six-day creation; light, plants, animals, then male and female humans together on day 6) vs. Genesis 2 (Yahweh Elohim; man formed from dust first, then plants/garden, then animals as potential companions, then woman from the man’s rib).
In Genesis 1 light exists on day 1 (with “evening and morning”), but the sun, moon, and stars are created on day 4.
God declares creation “very good” (Genesis 1:31) but later regrets making humanity (Genesis 6:6).
Flood and Noah (Genesis 6–9)
Number of animals: Genesis 6:19–20 commands two of every kind; Genesis 7:2–3 specifies seven pairs of clean animals and one pair of unclean.
Duration and chronology: rain for 40 days/nights in some verses vs. waters prevailing 150 days and a longer overall timeline in others; doublets of boarding, disembarking, and similar commands.
Two interwoven narrative strands (often linked to different sources using different divine names) produce repetitions and inconsistencies in details.
Patriarchal and early narratives
God’s name: Exodus 6:3 states God was known to the patriarchs as El Shaddai but not as Yahweh; Genesis 15:7 and other passages have God identifying as Yahweh to Abraham earlier.
Jacob/Esau deception and departure: details of the blessing and the reason for Jacob leaving vary between accounts in Genesis 27–28.
Abraham’s purchase of burial ground and related details conflict in some later retellings (e.g., Acts 7 vs. Genesis).
Numerical, chronological, and historical discrepancies (especially Chronicles vs. Samuel/Kings).
David’s census: 2 Samuel 24:1 attributes it to the Lord’s anger; 1 Chronicles 21:1 attributes it to Satan. Numbers differ (e.g., ~800,000 Israelite fighters in Samuel vs. ~1,100,000 in Chronicles; Judah figures also differ).
Ages and reign lengths of kings: e.g., Ahaziah 22 (2 Kings 8:26) vs. 42 (2 Chronicles 22:2); Jehoiachin 18 (2 Kings 24:8) vs. 8 (2 Chronicles 36:9).
Lists of returned exiles (Ezra 2 vs. Nehemiah 7) contain numerous numerical mismatches in family counts; grand totals do not match the summed figures.
Other details: names of officials (e.g., David’s scribe varies), numbers in battles or inventories, and sequences of events differ between parallel accounts.
Gospel narratives (birth, ministry, passion, resurrection)
Genealogies of Jesus: Matthew 1 (via Solomon, Joseph’s father Jacob, ~28 generations from Abraham) vs. Luke 3 (via Nathan, Joseph’s father Heli, longer list with different names after David). Both present as Joseph’s line.
Infancy: Matthew has magi, flight to Egypt, and return after Herod’s death; Luke has shepherds, presentation in the Temple, and direct return to Nazareth.
Timing relative to Quirinius’s census (Luke) conflicts with Herod’s reign (Matthew).
Baptism voice: wording and addressee differ slightly across Matthew, Mark, and Luke.
Jesus’ movements after baptism and early ministry details differ between Synoptics and John.
Temple cleansing: near the end of the ministry in the Synoptics; early in John.
Passion details: day of crucifixion (Synoptics place it after the Passover meal; John on the day of Preparation, aligning with Lamb of God imagery); last words differ (“My God, why have you forsaken me?” in Mark vs. “It is finished” in John); temple curtain timing relative to death varies between accounts; number of women at the tomb, number/identity of angels/men, whether they told anyone, and post-resurrection appearances differ.
Judas’s death: Matthew 27 (returns money, hangs himself; priests buy the field) vs. Acts 1 (keeps/buys the field himself, falls and bursts open).
Peter’s denial: Mark specifies before the rooster crows twice; other Gospels say before it crows (once)
Paul’s itinerary and Jerusalem visits: Acts vs. Galatians differ on sequence, timing, and meetings after conversion.
Other: Jairus’s daughter’s status when he approaches Jesus (dying vs. already dead); high priest name in the “bread of the Presence” incident (Mark names Abiathar where 1 Samuel has Ahimelech).
Theological, ethical, and doctrinal tensions
Nature/visibility of God: passages describe seeing or speaking with God face-to-face (e.g., Exodus 33, Genesis 32) vs. statements that no one has seen God or can see his face and live (John 1:18, Exodus 33:20).
Forgiveness and judgment: passages emphasising God’s unwillingness to forgive certain sins or destroying for wickedness vs. broad themes of mercy and forgiveness.
Violence, law, and ethics: “eye for an eye” and capital prescriptions in the Torah vs. “turn the other cheek,” love of enemies, and non-resistance in the Sermon on the Mount; Sabbath strictness vs. New Testament flexibility; polygamy and divorce practices in the Old Testament vs. stricter New Testament ideals.
Salvation and works: Paul emphasises justification by faith apart from works of the law; James states that faith without works is dead and that a person is justified by works and not by faith alone.
Inclusivity: “Whoever is not with me is against me” (Matthew) vs. “Whoever is not against us is for us” (Mark).
Slavery and social roles: regulations permitting and regulating slavery in the Torah and household codes vs. statements of equality in Christ; passages on women’s silence in church vs. examples of women in leadership roles.
Earth’s permanence: statements that the earth remains forever or is fixed (e.g., Ecclesiastes 1:4, Psalm 104:5) vs. New Testament passages about its destruction and a new earth.
Prophecy fulfillments or quotations that do not match the cited Old Testament text exactly (or cite the wrong prophet).
Manuscript and textual variants that affect details in some passages (later additions such as the longer ending of Mark or the Pericope Adulterae).
The Christians love to froth “Mystery Babylon!” and “Nimrod worship!” the second anything challenges their favourite bedtime story.
They act like their faith is some pure, one-of-a-kind revelation, then lash out when someone points out the obvious recycling: the dying-and-rising sun-king, the virgin-mother with the child, the twelve zodiacal companions, Eve in the garden, 10 commandments, the cross that folds into the solar cube, the December birth under the star, and the rest of it.
All of it was running in older Egyptian, solar, and mystery cult traditions long before their book showed up.
But the moment the parallels get noticed, the hysterics start screaming about Nimrod like the label magically erases the older sources.
They’re the ones following the solar-cult script under a new name, (kneeling on 🌞day, eating the body of a solar hero who rose at the vernal equinox,etc.,) then losing it when anyone calls the recycling what it is.
Keep yelling “Mystery Babylon!” at every exposé.
It only makes your inherited cope clearer.
Civilisations are not built from bricks and mortar.
They’re built from minds, hearts, ambition, passion, vision, and moral standards.
When those die, the whole thing starts collapsing.
That’s where we are.
The ancients were more existentially present in the world than we are.
They stayed aligned with nature instead of treating it as a resource to strip.
Their consciousness wasn’t sealed off inside individual skulls.
It was an extension of the living intelligence of the planet and the larger universe.
They related to plants and animals with the same directness we use when we talk to each other.
Egypt’s dynastic rulers operated as enlightened or near-enlightened figures.
For millennia their people remained in the Nile Valley and did not treat neighbouring lands as conquest targets.
Celtic and Gaelic Druids/Aryans refused to cut any living thing with a blade.
Compare that restraint and that ethics to the people running most governments today.
The ancient astrologers were not those who indulged in mere fortune-telling.
They tracked the actual linkages between the deeper phenomenal dimension and the everyday world, between matter and mind.
That linkage is what life is.
Without it, the claim that we are “living” is mostly performance.
Later bans on astrology were not about protecting people from superstition.
They were about severing the symbolic and practical connections between human beings and the rest of the living world.
The prohibition on idol worship worked the same way: it forced reliance on linear, left-brain calculation while starving the emotional body, imagination, and the capacities associated with the right brain.
The result was a systematic psychic imbalance.
Scientists are now, reluctantly, rediscovering what older traditions stated for thousands of years.
Materialism as a complete description of reality is failing.
Quantum findings make the older scientific dogmas harder to defend, even by the people who enforced them longest.
Thought has been shown to be non-local.
The brain behaves more like a hologram than a sealed computer.
Nonlinear modes of thinking increase neural density and connectivity.
Intelligence is not only intellectual; it is also somatic and emotional.
So-called junk DNA is functional.
The space between atoms is not empty.
The quantum domain appears to operate by rules continuous with those of consciousness.
Fractal patterns indicate an underlying order inside what looks like chaos.
Thought is fate and your character is your Destiny.
It’s only a matter of when and not if it will be rediscovered that the story of Our Lives is indeed written in the heavens and that what is above is also below.






















