Pinned Tweet
Yooper_Dave retweeted
Replying to @RafaelAnchia
You’re all voluntary sworn servants bound to the TX Constitution.
A broken oath of office is perjury.
Yooper_Dave retweeted
Was It A Jet Crash or A Missile Attack? Facts Versus Misinformation! teapawt.org/i/broadcasts/2brkZRAYo…
Yooper_Dave retweeted
Replying to @POTUS
@potus @realDonaldTrump @DevinNunes @StephenM @MELANIATRUMP
Elections, Voter Rolls, State & Federal Elections
Part 1 - A Plan to Save the County
- Get Get Of The Voter Rolls
#BurnTheVoterRolls
@POTUS @realDonaldTrump @DevinNunes @StephenM @Kash_Patel @MELANIATRUMP
Yooper_Dave retweeted
🚨MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN — PARENTS, WE NEED TO TALK!
What is happening in Macomb County Friend of the Court, and are parents’ constitutional rights being respected?
@MISupremeCourt @MI_Republicans @MISenDems @stephanielily @RealDaveCares4u @RepMattHall @GinaJohnsenMI
Yooper_Dave retweeted
Attempted to file an Affidavit of Petition for Declaratory Judgment at the Monroe County Circuit Court Clerk’s Office in Michigan. The clerk denied it. Watch the video and judge for yourself! @misupremecourt @repmatthall @mi_republicans @mihousedems @stephanielily @MISenDems
Yooper_Dave retweeted
SCOTUS admitted that the IRS uses Article 2 power.
That means when the IRS says you owe something, they are making a non-judicial determination that is not legally binding.
People are guaranteed a trial by jury that moves by the common law before government can deprive them of life, liberty, property.
Those with ears for fundamental law, let them hear.
Yooper_Dave retweeted
The text of the constitutions is the law.
If an office, like “attorney general”, is not written in the text, then the office is not in the constitution.
Very simple.
That means that something inferior to the constitution (statute) created the office.
Be wary of this, bc any grant of authority must come from the constitution’s text - and many offices are created to do & sustain uses of authority that have no general grant of power.
When America was founded, People prosecuted their own actions - public and private wrongs.
Attorneys today don’t know the law & so they hold to bad knowledge & a degraded view of the constitution. Their thinking doesn’t begin with the text of constitutions nor fundamental principles.
The easiest way to expose it is to ask where the text of whatever they say is in the constitution.
Plainly speaking, “attorney general” is not written in the US Constitution, which means that office is not a constitutional office in government’s frame.
Those with ears for fundamental law, let them hear.
Yooper_Dave retweeted
Attorneys aren’t taught Chisholm v Georgia (2 US 419), which is why they believe statutes control constitutional rights.
Yooper_Dave retweeted
With Love. Get In Here
Nuggets Nuggets Nuggets
God reveals that the Nation has flipped with Dave Jose teapawt.org/i/broadcasts/1RKZzBnmO…
Yooper_Dave retweeted
Figuring out who’s shit didn’t stick and turned out to be a machine distraction from the paper ballots when it comes to the last six years of pillow pushers and podcasters?
A famous group of people?
Yooper_Dave retweeted
Voting
VOTING, participle present tense expressing the mind, will or preference in election, or in determining questions proposed; giving a vote or suffrage; electing, deciding, giving or enacting by vote.
System
SYS'TEM, noun [Latin systema; Gr. to set.]
1. An assemblage of things adjusted into a regular whole; or a whole plan or scheme consisting of many parts connected in such a manner as to create a chain of mutual dependencies; or a regular union of principles or parts forming one entire thing. Thus we say, a system of logic, a system of philosophy, a system of government, a system of principles, the solar system the Copernican system a system of divinity, a system of law, a system of morality, a system of husbandry, a system of botany or of chimistry.
2. Regular method or order.
3. In music, an interval compounded or supposed to be compounded of several lesser intervals, as the fifth octave, etc. the elements of which are called diastems.
Yooper_Dave retweeted
Chatrie v US (2026), ...“society’s expectation has been that law enforcement agents and others would not—and indeed, in the main, simply could not—secretly monitor and catalogue every single movement of an individual’s car.”
Now they are lying!
This lawyer claims that the Supreme Court has upheld that flock cameras are legal. The fact is the Supreme Court hasn't ruled on them yet, and on similar technology is has determined they are NOT Constitutional/legal.
Carpenter vs United States (2018): "...individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the comprehensive record of their physical movements."
And again they make the argument these cameras will be OK once you "have a balance". That once you put the right rules in place they will be fine.
NO! They will never be fine. They will always end up being abused because we know that one day, a leader who fully intends to abuse them will be elected into office. That dangerous leader cannot have this technology in place when they take office. The abuse of power they will be capable of is too vast, too immense for us to take the risk!
Flock cameras MUST BE REMOVED! We will never be fully free so long as they exist.
Yooper_Dave retweeted
Fourth Amendment sez no warrant issues absent affidavit under penalty of perjury.
When government fails, remember we, the people created it under our constitutions.
They are just contractors and agents. Use the law.
Yooper_Dave retweeted
Flock told the Oshkosh city council its cameras don't track where your car goes.
The council found out that was false. They killed the contract 7 to 0 in about 24 hours.
Full version and breakdown in the thread.
Yooper_Dave retweeted
250 years strong.
What began as a bold experiment in freedom has become the greatest nation in the history of mankind.
A government of the people, by the people, and for the people — and the American story is still being written.
Happy Independence Day! 🇺🇸






















