Ancient History Criticisms

Because it's shaped like a Shiva Linga (there's several shapes). The bigger the more holy, from what I can tell. It's all performative theatrics for Indian normies. The real holy hallmarks are the nubs on their stone temples, they won't acknowledge it, but you can clearly see it

I mean, hello? There are secret occult groups associated with masonry. Literally called FREEmasonry. Free, given, proffered, supplanted. They built our reality. We live in their simulacrum. Who's getting sued, imprisoned, killed for talking about Atlantis or Flat Earth? Nobody

You just gave the subject more pause and consideration with that one tweet than all the rest of the alternative history researchers. That's the problem, there's an elephant in the alternative history room, and all I see is everyone ignoring it.

I can't entertain any bronze-age theories like "a ruler wanted to cover something up", because this isn't bronze-age evidence at all. There's a huge disconnect, a massive abyssal gulf between how the sites were manufactured, and what is inferred by the iconography and artwork.

IF we are to believe Japanese historical accounts... Which culture told the truth, if any? Which culture knew the truth and how would we know if they never told the public?

The diagonally-repeating "L" shaped blocks are consistent as well.

And it exhibits faux-joinery, just like Saqsaywaman. @OurHiddenPast