AlBahithah πŸ” (@AlBahithah) header
AlBahithah πŸ” (@AlBahithah) profile picture

Documenting my thoughts on truly studying the religion I was raised in.

Writing probably
Joined May 2025
Photo by AlBahithah πŸ” (@AlBahithah)Photo by AlBahithah πŸ” (@AlBahithah)Photo by AlBahithah πŸ” (@AlBahithah)Photo by AlBahithah πŸ” (@AlBahithah)Photo by AlBahithah πŸ” (@AlBahithah)Photo by AlBahithah πŸ” (@AlBahithah)Photo by AlBahithah πŸ” (@AlBahithah)Photo by AlBahithah πŸ” (@AlBahithah)Photo by AlBahithah πŸ” (@AlBahithah)Photo by AlBahithah πŸ” (@AlBahithah)
🧡Recently heard/watched this for the first time. Very interesting video. Jackson brings up ridiculous accusations against #jehovahswitnesses . One of the accusations he labels as β€˜ridiculous’ is the idea that Jehovah’s Witnesses don’t love their children because of
In the latest morning worship video on JW org, Geoffrey Jackson implies every JW loss in court is due to corruption, bribery and political pressure!
1
1
11
836
Still waiting for this scripture. I’ve looked myself but can’t seem to find it. Maybe I’m not looking hard enough, it’s why I genuinely asked.
Ultimately though, you’ve given me information I already know and haven’t asked for. You’ve brought up the issue of blood on a post where it hasn’t actually been mentioned. Why? You have yet to actually answer my original query. teapawt.org/albahithah/status/2117…
2
1
5
410
I should clarify I mean the scripture that states that one can have autologous transfusions of whole blood and not allogeneic ones as that is what can be implied in the medical information for clinicians section of JW.org
47
I have been down this IBSA and BSA road before, when I stumbled across the property selling page. I do not understand why questions are met with defensiveness.
36
Also worth pointing out here that multiple Bible students did speaking tours based on the book. The contents of the book were essentially official doctrine #exjw #jehovahswitnesses
Irrelevant. Jehovah’s witnesses don’t separate that era from the organisation, it’s why 1914 and 1918 are still very relevant to the organisation despite it being the Bible student era. The organisation has made no difference between the two eras.
1
1
83
And far from just being a publishing house, Bible students preached what they believed to be true as far back as 1919, a year before the book β€˜millions now living will never die’. here jw.org/en/library/magazines/…
3
1
43
There is no difference between the two eras as jwredeemerwl has seemed to imply, Bible student era publications were essentially renamed if we are to believe what is said here jw.org/en/library/books/pure…
1
1
12
Anyways, enough replying to those who cannot have genuine conversations (for now :P) it has made for good research though
28
Will be writing about this at some point. This line of reasoning also falls flat when compared with what has been said in the updates, and of course reality. Have heard this defence in person and still keen to know what advancements made the teaching change twice in 6 months. πŸ€”
They can also accept the guidance and the reasoning behind how Scripture has consistently addressed whole blood, as well as how science has made significant advancements and established enough safeguards for individuals to make their own decisions.
1
52
Irrelevant. Jehovah’s witnesses don’t separate that era from the organisation, it’s why 1914 and 1918 are still very relevant to the organisation despite it being the Bible student era. The organisation has made no difference between the two eras.
Replying to @AlBahithah
Just so you know, that 1921 book was still considered part of the Bible Student Era, and Witnesses officially began in 1931. The "Watchtower" continues to function as a publishing house; however, it is also the headquarters for Witnesses.
2
1
3
380
The proclaimers book has also felt it necessary to twist the purpose and contents of the book. It’s a big part of JW history but certain publications just aren’t published in the watchtower online library. Including those after the Bible student era.
53
When I was skeptical (and to some extent I think you can say I still am) I would ask questions, I genuinely wanted (and still do) my queries explained. I found it unfortunate that these questions were met with defensiveness.
1
1
3
242
I also think Jehovah’s witnesses could easily get rid of the issue of so called β€˜apostates’ (those who are actually just researching the religion) by being open about what was previously taught.
15
The response to a genuine question. What will be the response when someone asks similar questions when you preach to them? Unhinged responses bring the organisation into disrepute in my opinion.
Replying to @AlBahithah
Your mental state is acting up again, and no amount of explanation will penetrate a delusional mind since you are complicating the issue with wordplay and confusion. Once again, get a life and move on!
2
2
148
AlBahithah πŸ” retweeted
Replying to @AlBahithah
Yes
1
3
51
There are times where you just let people crash out. Tweets will probably go missing at some point πŸ˜‚
1
40
A great man once said "Error always seeks the dark, while truth is always embraced by the light. Error never desires to be investigated. light always courts a thorough and complete investigation. Light and truth are synonymous. They are progressive" #exjw
3
1
18
970
Witnesses @jwredeemerwl have no issue in labelling people as 'mentally challenged' if they dare to disagree with them. They will knock on doors preaching with a smile, but god forbid you disagree with them.
4
1
11
266
It's also telling how witnesses like @jwredeemerwl speak about mental wellbeing. All of the people I know who have been hospitalised for genuine mental issues have been witnesses, some of them were not treated kindly by those in the congregation who saw their struggles as
2
2
50
something to be ashamed off. Jehovah's Witnesses labelling those who disagree with them as 'mentally challenged' says so much about how people who genuinely have these issues are seen by those around them. It's very sad.
3
26