Alex Carten retweeted
In 1761 Johann Lambert proved π can never be written as a fraction. This is what that proof looks like when you draw it.
2 sticks spin. The first turns at speed 1. The second turns π times faster. The tip draws a line.
If π were a fraction like 22/7, the line would come back to where it started and repeat forever.
It never does. Every loop lands somewhere new. Run it for a billion years and it still won't close.
People have chased that gap for 2,000 years. Archimedes squeezed π between 223/71 and 22/7 around 250 BC. In the 5th century, Zu Chongzhi found 355/113, right to 6 decimal places.
Today we know over 100 trillion digits. NASA needs about 15 of them to fly a probe across the solar system.
The case for "close enough": 3.14 builds bridges. 355/113 lands spacecraft. Nobody needs the rest.
So why does the universe run on a number that never ends?
In 1761 Johann Lambert proved π can never be written as a fraction. This is what that proof looks like when you draw it.
2 sticks spin. The first turns at speed 1. The second turns π times faster. The tip draws a line.
If π were a fraction like 22/7, the line would come back to where it started and repeat forever.
It never does. Every loop lands somewhere new. Run it for a billion years and it still won't close.
People have chased that gap for 2,000 years. Archimedes squeezed π between 223/71 and 22/7 around 250 BC. In the 5th century, Zu Chongzhi found 355/113, right to 6 decimal places.
Today we know over 100 trillion digits. NASA needs about 15 of them to fly a probe across the solar system.
The case for "close enough": 3.14 builds bridges. 355/113 lands spacecraft. Nobody needs the rest.
So why does the universe run on a number that never ends?
Alex Carten retweeted
Richard Feynman said this one experiment contains the only real mystery of quantum mechanics. This is it, solved with the Schrödinger equation.
In 1801 Thomas Young shone light through 2 thin slits and saw stripes on the wall. Light was a wave. Case closed.
Then physicists did it with electrons. Tiny charged particles, each one lands as a single dot.
In 1989 a team at Hitachi fired them 1 at a time. No electron could interfere with another. The dots still built up the same stripes.
That's what you're watching. 1 electron, as a wave, hitting a wall with 2 gaps. Part bounces back. Part goes through both slits at once and overlaps with itself on the other side. The colors are the phase of the wave.
Where the 2 halves agree, the electron is likely to land. Where they cancel, it never does.
The case for common sense: put a detector at the slits to see which one it used, and the stripes vanish. It behaves like a particle again.
So did the electron go through 1 slit or both?
Richard Feynman said this one experiment contains the only real mystery of quantum mechanics. This is it, solved with the Schrödinger equation.
In 1801 Thomas Young shone light through 2 thin slits and saw stripes on the wall. Light was a wave. Case closed.
Then physicists did it with electrons. Tiny charged particles, each one lands as a single dot.
In 1989 a team at Hitachi fired them 1 at a time. No electron could interfere with another. The dots still built up the same stripes.
That's what you're watching. 1 electron, as a wave, hitting a wall with 2 gaps. Part bounces back. Part goes through both slits at once and overlaps with itself on the other side. The colors are the phase of the wave.
Where the 2 halves agree, the electron is likely to land. Where they cancel, it never does.
The case for common sense: put a detector at the slits to see which one it used, and the stripes vanish. It behaves like a particle again.
So did the electron go through 1 slit or both?
Alex Carten retweeted
In 1909 Ernest Rutherford fired particles at gold foil thinner than a hair. A few of them bounced straight back. He called it the most incredible event of his life.
Everyone expected them to fly through. Back then the atom was a "plum pudding": a soft cloud of positive charge with electrons stuck in it. Nothing in there could stop a bullet.
Then 1 particle in about 8,000 came back.
"It was almost as incredible as if you fired a 15-inch shell at a piece of tissue paper and it came back and hit you."
In 1911 he worked out why. Almost all the mass sits in a tiny core in the middle, about 100,000 times smaller than the atom. The rest is empty space with electrons circling it.
That's the picture in this video. It's on logos, textbooks and the flag of the IAEA.
It has a fatal flaw. An electron moving in a circle should radiate light, lose energy and spiral into the nucleus in about a hundred-billionth of a second. Every atom in your body should have collapsed.
The case for the picture: the nucleus is real, the empty space is real, and every chemistry class still starts here.
So is this the most useful drawing in science, or the most famous lie we still teach?
In 1909 Ernest Rutherford fired particles at gold foil thinner than a hair. A few of them bounced straight back. He called it the most incredible event of his life.
Everyone expected them to fly through. Back then the atom was a "plum pudding": a soft cloud of positive charge with electrons stuck in it. Nothing in there could stop a bullet.
Then 1 particle in about 8,000 came back.
"It was almost as incredible as if you fired a 15-inch shell at a piece of tissue paper and it came back and hit you."
In 1911 he worked out why. Almost all the mass sits in a tiny core in the middle, about 100,000 times smaller than the atom. The rest is empty space with electrons circling it.
That's the picture in this video. It's on logos, textbooks and the flag of the IAEA.
It has a fatal flaw. An electron moving in a circle should radiate light, lose energy and spiral into the nucleus in about a hundred-billionth of a second. Every atom in your body should have collapsed.
The case for the picture: the nucleus is real, the empty space is real, and every chemistry class still starts here.
So is this the most useful drawing in science, or the most famous lie we still teach?
Alex Carten retweeted
Erwin Schrödinger wrote the equation behind every shape in this video in 1926. That September, in Copenhagen, he sat down with Niels Bohr to defend it.
Bohr said an electron jumps between energy levels in zero time. No path. Schrödinger said it flows.
"If all this damned quantum jumping were really to stay, I should be sorry I ever got involved with quantum theory."
They argued for days. Schrödinger came down with a fever and went to bed in Bohr's house. Bohr sat on the edge of the bed and kept going.
Bohr's answer: "But the rest of us are grateful that you did."
In the video below, every shape is 1 electron in 2 states at once, flowing from one to the other. No jump.
In 2019, 93 years after that fight, physicists at Yale caught a quantum jump in the middle. It took time. They reversed it before it finished.
The case for Bohr: measure the electron, and you still find it on 1 level. Never halfway.
So did Bohr win the argument, or did Schrödinger just need 93 years?
Erwin Schrödinger wrote the equation behind every shape in this video in 1926. That September, in Copenhagen, he sat down with Niels Bohr to defend it.
Bohr said an electron jumps between energy levels in zero time. No path. Schrödinger said it flows.
"If all this damned quantum jumping were really to stay, I should be sorry I ever got involved with quantum theory."
They argued for days. Schrödinger came down with a fever and went to bed in Bohr's house. Bohr sat on the edge of the bed and kept going.
Bohr's answer: "But the rest of us are grateful that you did."
In the video below, every shape is 1 electron in 2 states at once, flowing from one to the other. No jump.
In 2019, 93 years after that fight, physicists at Yale caught a quantum jump in the middle. It took time. They reversed it before it finished.
The case for Bohr: measure the electron, and you still find it on 1 level. Never halfway.
So did Bohr win the argument, or did Schrödinger just need 93 years?
each shape is a real solution of the Schrödinger equation for hydrogen: 2 orbitals added together, evolving in time.
animation by Imagining Physics (@AnssiKuha )
In 1906 J.J. Thomson won the Nobel Prize for proving the electron is a particle. In 1937 his son George won the Nobel Prize for proving it’s a wave.
Both were right. That’s the problem.
The father found it in 1897 by bending beams inside a glass tube with magnets. A tiny charged speck, about 1,800 times lighter than a hydrogen atom. A particle. Case closed.
28 years later, an accident at Bell Labs reopened it. In 1925 a bottle of liquid air exploded next to Clinton Davisson’s vacuum tube. Air rushed in and burned his nickel target. To clean it, he baked the metal, and it fused into a few big crystals.
When he fired electrons at it again, they no longer scattered like pellets. They came off at sharp, exact angles, the fingerprint of a wave. In Scotland, George Thomson shot electrons through thin metal film and got rings.
Keep this part. An electron travels as a wave and lands as a dot. In 100 years nobody has caught it doing only one, and nobody has made it choose.
The clip is 20 seconds of the Schrödinger equation running. 1 electron hits 1 rod. Watch it, then decide.
Did the father get it wrong, or the son?
want to run it yourself? the full Blender script is open source. 1 click and it renders the video:
github.com/AlexCarten/quantu…
real simulation of the Schrödinger equation, rendered in Blender. the orange surface is where the electron is most likely to be. the white stripes are the phase of the wave.
a single hair is 100 billion times wider than the thing at the end of this video
hair → cell → fibril → atom → nucleus → proton
and the proton still isn't the bottom
You are not made of particles. You’re made of waves.
One pure wave stretches forever and sits nowhere. Multiply it by a bell curve and suddenly it has a location. That’s a wave packet, and it’s what every electron in your body actually is.
The catch: the sharper you want the location, the more waves you have to stack. Infinitely many for a perfect point. That’s the uncertainty principle, and it falls straight out of the math.
Alex Carten retweeted
Every physics teacher you had lied a little. An electron isn’t a tiny dot flying down a line, it’s this.
This is a Gaussian wave packet, the simplest quantum particle there is, straight from the Schrödinger equation. The blue spiral is the wavefunction. The red dot is where a classical ball would be.
The bell tells you where it probably is. The twist tells you how fast it’s moving. Squeeze one and the other blurs. Not because our instruments are bad. Because the universe doesn’t allow both.
Every physics teacher you had lied a little. An electron isn’t a tiny dot flying down a line, it’s this.
This is a Gaussian wave packet, the simplest quantum particle there is, straight from the Schrödinger equation. The blue spiral is the wavefunction. The red dot is where a classical ball would be.
The bell tells you where it probably is. The twist tells you how fast it’s moving. Squeeze one and the other blurs. Not because our instruments are bad. Because the universe doesn’t allow both.


