Be off with you, foul troll. Nothing more than sealioning blowhardery with such cowardice and rigid attachment to "de legul prossess, innit"; it just sounds like a bunch of devout estoppelites. Nobody is debating the legal process other than you, and however many alt/fake accounts are attached to this. My advice would be to debate the validity of the actual alternative explanations, or sod off to some other "debated true crime case". Conspiracy theories are only conspiracy theories until they're proven to be true. For example: 1. Watergate's Cover-up Reached President Nixon 2. Tuskegee Researchers Withheld Syphilis Treatment 3. Tobacco Companies Concealed Smoking's Dangers 4. Project MKUltra Used Unwitting Human Subjects 5. COINTELPRO Targeted Civil Rights and Anti-war Groups 6. Operation Northwoods Proposed False Pretexts for War 7. Operation Paperclip Recruited German Scientists 8. The CIA Maintained Secret Media Relationships 9. Misleading Incubator Testimony Helped Sell the Gulf War 10. Iran-Contra Concealed Arms Sales and Rebel Funding 11. The NSA Collected Americans' Phone Records in Bulk What Makes a Conspiracy “Proved True”? If such outlandish conspiracy theories such as the above can turn out to be true, then what about more domestic "cover-ups" that saw people branded conspiracy theorists? For example: 1. The Post Office Horizon scandal 2. Hillsborough 3. The contaminated blood scandal of the 70's and 80's 4. The "spy cops" scandal 5. Historical Westminster Abuse & The Missing Dossiers As for "de eveedunce iz eveedunce, innit", in 10 years, approximately 60 murder convictions were referred to the CCRC, with up to 70% of those referrals resulting in the overturning of the conviction. Conspiracy theorists, my arse, Trolletta.