i don't get the hate towards cianne at this point. the issue was already addressed way back, she acknowledged na insensitive/bad joke yung post ng father niya. but how does that automatically make her an enabler or someone who tolerates animal cruelty? you can disagree with her calling it a “bad joke” without equating her with his father's actions. criticize her statement, not assume she is an enabler. she literally assured everyone na walang animal cruelty na nangyari and that they wouldn't allow such things to happen, and even validated the concerns of everyone. and let's be real, yung mga kumakalat na screenshots aren't, by themselves, proof na talagang nanakit or pumatay ng pusa yung father niya with their dogs. if there's actual evidence, then let it be investigated properly. you can call out her father's insensitive joke without making assumptions na pareho sila ng paniniwala or intentions. direct that criticism towards the person who made it, hindi sa yung nag-address na nga ng issue and assured ppl na hindi niya tinotolerate ang animal cruelty. at this point, parang naghahanap na lang kayo ng butas sa statement ni cianne just to justify the hate. you don't have to agree with how she handled the situation, but stop twisting her words. stop making cianne the punching bag for something she didn't personally do. animal cruelty is never a joke, yes, but neither is it fair to keep dragging someone over assumptions and guilt by association. accountability should be based on actions and evidence, not on who someone's father is. tantanan niyo na si cianne.