
Follow the arc @dclimateDAO #YFI @KERNEL0x #kb3
Joined April 2021
- Tweets2.1K
- Following6.6K
- Followers1.1K
- Likes128K
Pinned Tweet
Replying to @disco___cat
They are doing this because they are losing control and are scared, do not confuse this with strength but for what it is, weakness.There are many significant decentralized initiatives worked on over the past decade that need final polishing to be done and make this all moot
Can that SF company which has a space mirror that shines light anywhere on earth at night create a crowfunded smart contract so that we can as a community decide who needs a light on their house all night long? People keep saying Ethereum needs a usecase...
1
7
195
Arcturus 🌥️ retweeted
it’s not that hard
core devs don’t use ethereum and never used DeFi (if not recently), just theoretical work (good but not enough to maintain a protocol)
period
do more dogfooding
it’s like build a car without driving
you have to be your own first user
well my pov is still the one i shared in the core dev's agenda 2 weeks (when nobody was yet talking about this lol): github.com/ethereum/pm/issue…
imho Glamsterdam should not be shipped in its current form, period.
Arcturus 🌥️ retweeted
This is the first Ethereum talk I've watched this year, and uuugh...
Lemme speak as an outsider, who for whatever reason still has most of his net worth in ETH. This entire Ether issuance discussion is so stupid.
There is this bigass skeleton in the closet, and everyone pretends we don't see it. Let me shine some light: there is fuck-all to do on Ethereum. <gasp>
The reason so many people have ETH is because they believe in this shit - I believe in this shit -, and the reason everyone stakes ETH is because there isn't anything else to do with it!
Sure, you can shove it in the casino and hope it doesn't get drained; or when shit hits the fan, that you're awake to pull out before the cards fall. Who in their right mind would consider that a store of value?
The entire Ether issuance discussion is trying to remedy the symptom instead of the root of the problem. The symptom is that everyone wants to stake instead of using the network, so there's no economic activity being generated. Your thinking is that by reducing the staking rewards, you are stimulating economic activity. No dum-dum, by reducing the issuance you're making people choose between the casino or exiting. This isn't fiat where you're forced geopolitically into a specific currency; you can just sell this shit.
Stop fucking with monetary policy and start making useful shit that people want to use in their day to day lives. Improve the human condition and they will spend ETH on it and generate economic activity. Improve the reliability of the ecosystem so people aren't afraid of losing their saving while they sleep. Figure out recourse mechanisms so when shit hits the fan, the little guy doesn't crash and burn. Maybe then people will also use Ether, not just keep it under the pillow.
The problem isn't that staked Ether isn't generating activity; the problem is that active Ether's is fucking risky. People want to live their lives, not play onchain PvP against the entire world. I can't believe I have to be the one to fucking say this out aloud.
Cheers, hit like and subscribe for next year's post-devcon rant from Lisbon 🫡
This quoted post is unavailable.
this is completely ridiculous
besides the already huge list of 200,000 affected contracts in ethereum/repricing-impact, i found multiple methodological issues that make it miss many more.
it affects deployment and operation of several high profile protocols, not just some random devs misusing opcodes that were given to them.
i shared my findings privately with chainsecurity and i refuse to participate in this clownery
We should continue towards Glam activation asap.
A lot of research went into Glam's strategy to increase opcode gas prices for state creation.
It seems fair to say that the timing of this debate is irrelevant as to its correctness or rightness for eth and our users... Yet, why did some of us (eg. quoted author who is an ef board member) only start looking in detail at Glam EIPs eg. after testnet forks started? This isn't a personal attack, it's an observation that there's a collective responsibility-- for OP, for me, for all of us-- to steward fork strategy at the right times in the process.
imo ethereum's commitments to apps do not extend to gas pricing, or to total ETH fee levels, or to USD fees. And also not to opcode pricing or gas introspection that depends on those prices. We guarantee maximally credibly neutral, maximally live access to the correct state transition function. Those guarantees imply that we always use a neutral pricing mechanism to clear congestion wherever possible. However, pricing opcodes can't use a neutral mechanism, we need to pick magic number opcode gas prices. Some of our best people researched this extensively and picked updated magic numbers, and that's something imo we should stick with now and continue our larger plans that are on track to grow to global ubiquity.
The good news and practical reality may be that the explosion of blockspace supply from 60M to 200M gas limit seems likely to absolutely crater the L1 gas price. It will take time for demand to grow to meet the new supply, including from net new entrants (eg. GENIUS and institutions), induced demand from lower prices, and the coming next gen of return-to-mainnet-type eth native apps.
By the time L1 blockspace demand catches up, we will be exploding supply again as we get closer to the full lean eth vision. That's eth's vision: postquantum and postAI ETH SoV, supported by ethereum's hypergrowing capacity, which is supported by best-in-class security and formal verification.
Looking back, it's unfortunate that we provided these affected contracts with a footgun that has put them in the situation where they were *able* to rely on fake guarantees that ethereum never promises (afaik, essentially just gas introspection). We're sorry.
imo it's time to roll forward on this. Let's do what we can in an appropriately scoped capacity for the affected contracts, then activate Glam asap, and continue our excellent progress towards global ubiquity.
Arcturus 🌥️ retweeted
Introducing Supersmooth:
All the best DeFi protocols and strategies, one app, in a wallet you own.
- Borrow
- Multiply
- Earn
- Loop Yields
- Trade Perps
Live on @base, @ethereum, @arbitrum and @RobinhoodCrypto Chain
Frontends should be entirely on-chain, accessed via IPFS, or shouldn't exist. The fact that there are still MiTM attacks / supply chain attacks and it's almost 2027 is insane to me.
i decompiled the contract that drained binance wallet 14
gist.wavey.info/Ta3FgAxastgj…
imagine a fully integrated AI future where being banned means you are now economically useless. everybody around you is a superhuman living in the future but you violated TOS and now are cut off.
your smart glasses that showed you a beautiful utopia? the color has left them. you are forced to live in a bleak gray world. you are forced to look your wife in her actual face and she is not happy with you.
you are digging holes with a spoon while everybody else is building skyscrapers with an army of bots.
this is the real doomer catastrophe
open source is the only way to protect your freedom, your economic viability & your ability to tell these companies to fuck right off.
a few months ago openAI and anthropic were desperately begging the admin to make it legal for them to collaborate. if they got their way, one TOS violation on either platform would send you directly to the sunken place.
Arcturus 🌥️ retweeted
Cybersecurity and the Singularity
This week's events have driven home to me and many others the importance of being ready for a few weeks of disruption to western civilization.
The internet’s foundations are old and shaky. AI now finds the cracks faster than people can patch them and exploits them at a scale no human threat actor could match.
Much of the system also runs through a few chokepoints: a short list of certificate companies, a handful of cloud data centers, a few pieces of shared plumbing. One failure at any of them cuts off millions at once. The answer isn’t panic; it’s making sure no single failure can cut you off from everything.
If people suddenly can’t trust the internet, the economic effects will be real, and I expect stocks could take a significant hit. So far the market has gone the other way: security companies rose on the PHP news and the index was up on the day (Yahoo Finance). That could change quickly if a major breach or outage lands.
As I write this, neither the Fox News nor the CNN homepage features any of this. That’s no accident: mainstream news has little incentive to cover something this scary to the mainstream population. There is some reporting here and there, but its scattered and below the fold, and almost nobody connects them into the bigger story: the rapidly degrading ability of the internet to serve as civilization’s backbone.
What to do: be ready for two weeks of disruption
The overall goal: no single failure should cut you off from your money, your accounts or the internet. Two weeks is a reasonable window for systems to be restored and life to stabilize, and it’s what West Coast earthquake planners have told households for years. With that cushion you can wait out a disruption instead of scrambling through it.
- Turn on automatic updates for your phone, computer and browser. The eMudhra fix reached a billion browsers within days with no effort from their users. Everything that doesn’t update itself is still exposed.
- Keep two weeks of supplies at home: food, water, medications. This gives you immense peace of mind in the situation that the supply chains are disrupted.
- Keep gas tanks full and EVs charged. Pumps and chargers depend on power and card payments.
- Spread your money across several banks, with a working card from each. If one goes down, you aren’t cut off from everything.
- Rethink how much you keep in the market. The market disagrees with me today. I think it’s underpricing a major breach or outage, and the modest gains of the next few months may not be worth the risk of a sharp drop. In the more intense scenarios, the markets themselves could be inoperable for a time. It’s a judgment call, so weigh it against when you’ll need the money and the taxes on selling, but diversification is worth far more than it was a year ago.
- Keep two independent ways online: Starlink on a battery or generator, plus a phone on a cell carrier. In a long outage, cell towers run out of backup power; Starlink on a generator keeps going.
- Hold some crypto in a hardware wallet, as a hedge against banks specifically. The bugs that take down banks are different from the ones that threaten crypto you hold yourself, so the two are unlikely to fail together. It does not hedge an internet or power failure; cash does that. Buy the wallet from the manufacturer, keep the recovery phrase on paper or metal and offline, never type it into anything, and check every transaction on the device’s own screen.
- Use a password manager and passkeys for email and banking, and print the recovery codes. Do email first; it can reset everything else.
- Treat any urgent message about your money as suspicious: bank alerts, “security notices,” support messages, even a loved one who might be spoofed. Reach them through a channel you already trust, like the number on your card. Agree on a family code word. Video calls are harder to fake for the next few months; then they too will be fully fakeable.
- Cash cannot be hacked. Worth having more than you typically do around.
The future is beautiful, but there might be some bumps along the way as we adopt. I'm excited to help build it with all of you!
Me when I have a platform to slow down the opps
ok it's official... AI-written unit tests and integration tests are empirically proven to be unhelpful. you should tell your agents to stop writing tests by themselves
on the deepswe eval set, banning sonnet 5.5 high from writing any tests actually resulted in slightly higher success rate (non stat-sig), with less time and token spent (stat-sig). this is pretty hard empirical evidence
across the tests that were written by the "tests allowed" baseline arm, 65% of them were unit tests, 35% were integration tests, neither bucket resulted in any improvement compared to not writing any tests at all
i also picked a random sample of 44 tasks subset where i completely disabled executing even existing tests - it also did not affect success rate at all
i spot checked many tests written in the baseline arm, and my intuition is that most tests are simply a repetition of the implementation
agent-written tests do not add any value because both the implementation and the tests were simply the agent's interpretation of our intent. the tests aren't any more accurate than the implementation itself
i suspect we can still extract some value from unit tests and integration tests if we describe them ourselves when we believe we can articulate our intent better through test cases than through requirements. but i have not proven this yet
also worth noting, during deepswe eval the agent wrote almost no e2e tests (only 17, compared to 3000+ unit/integration tests written). so this analysis does not prove nor disprove the value of e2e tests - i will do another eval specifically for that
6
10
244
Arcturus 🌥️ retweeted
"code licenses are completely meaningless now. One guy came on our forum, presented a slop but functional mod, I asked to clean up a few small things before merging and instead of doing so he asked AI do re program the whole thing from scratch to not use my framework."
🤖 Made with AI
I think I will leave the modding scene within a few years. AI has absolutely ruined it from me.
I know, the world changes, it's fine. But I'll give you my reasons anyway:
- the amount of mods per day has grown exponentially, between the junk, enough are good, and your carefully crafted mods get buried under.
- code bases are growing into monsters, I get a PR every day to fix some stuff on Luma and it's 60000 lines of changes to fix a basic bug.
- it genuinely feel like I'm not much needed anymore. I used to be one of the few ones able to mod old games (HDR, ambient occlusion, DLSS). Now many can slop something in no time, even if it's nowhere as good, many won't know.
- code licenses are completely meaningless now. One guy came on our forum, presented a slop but functional mod, I asked to clean up a few small things before merging and instead of doing so he asked AI do re program the whole thing from scratch to not use my framework.
- making mods has become massively easier, and that's nice, but also the pleasure of gradually unravelling a picture as you reverse engineer a game is gone.
All these things paint a bleak picture.
There's gonna be enough tinkerers to make mods even without me probably, so, no loss.





















