Replying to @Carlospoca @Leophilius
my point is that it is a fact that SH games the YT algorithm and appeals to academia haters and people unaware of employed practicing physicists counter arguments bc they don't have a huge YT channel. I like a lot of Sabine's content and I hold no judgment. Dave grifts algo too and both are fine sci communicators.
employed particle physicists example (Nima Arkani-Hamed):
math.columbia.edu/~woit/word…
Replying to @lookoutitsbbear
yes, pretty much, except maybe sometimes:
Replying to @ArgonGruber
This is what I was responding too. You specifically asked for an explanation regarding the EM field frequency band. What's so special about that band is a property of light interacting at the sensory layer, not private, subjective quale. Easy problem fine, plenty of work to do.
Replying to @Dexerto
Does anyone else feel the urge to crack that open for a taste before piloting a plane?
Adding Tunneling Nanotubes to the list of biological neural interaction types that do not involve synapses
Replying to @WKCosmo
I am pretty sure it was a joke, and here is how he asked it, he would have got many more likes on X and the replies would have probably been much more entertaining
Replying to @ThePrimaryMind
For context, Goff's recent posts and recent podcasts discussions are stemming a debate awhile ago, tried to timestamp approx place. He basically says SC understanding is worse than a failing undergrad student. Now poking at it again
youtu.be/rCPCyri1rXU?t=2680&…
Replying to @vineettiruvadi
i define AI as any engineered system that performs tasks normally reserved for biological intelligence, kinda old school i guess
so you probably hate diagrams like this? ML is discipline/methodology/means of achieving AI maybe?
Replying to @Math_files @Phi61861
youtu.be/YTQKbgxbtiw?si=VnY5…
I watched this the other day about how the zeta function and Brownian motion connect, thought I'd share












