100th EPISODE! ELECTION INTEGRITY SPECIAL | Going Rogue with Lara Logan For our milestone 100th episode of Going Rogue with Lara Logan, we went LIVE before a studio audience at the America First Warehouse in Long Island, New York, for a special investigation into one of the most consequential issues facing America ahead of the 2026 midterms. From Venezuela to America’s voting systems, Lara and an extraordinary panel of intelligence experts, investigators, and election integrity advocates examine election manipulation, the vulnerabilities in our voting infrastructure, and the national security implications. Featuring Gary Berntsen, Ralph Pezzullo, Martin Rodil, Mark Cook, Dr. Andrew Paquette, Ed Solomon, Joe Hoft, and Tina Peters. 00:00:00 Opening clips and introduction of the Going Rogue 100th episode live event 00:01:13 Lara Logan introduces panelists Gary Berntsen, Martin Rodil, and Ralph Pezzullo 00:06:32 Origins of voting machine concerns: HAVA, Venezuela, and Smartmatic 00:15:19 Smartmatic ownership shuffling and the 2025 Liberty Vote sale 00:17:18 Recruiting software engineers abroad and building a lab in the Bahamas and Switzerland 00:23:00 Violence against a witness's family and cartel involvement 00:28:09 Tina Peters' forensic images and source code obtained 00:30:37 U.S. intelligence and law enforcement penetration and inaction 00:39:12 USAID, CEPPS, and funding foreign use of Smartmatic technology 00:43:00 Machines are compromised without internet connection 00:44:45 FBI scrutiny of the panelists and hybrid warfare against the U.S. 00:49:35 intelligence community, media, and what citizens can do 00:55:50 Cartel de los Soles and Tren de Aragua 01:00:07 China's role, fentanyl, and unrestricted warfare 01:02:25 Panel calls to action and discussion of leadership and Venezuela policy 01:14:34 Second panel introduced: Mark Cook, Andrew Paquette, Ed Solomon, Joseph Hoft 01:17:24 Mark Cook outlines two requirements for fair elections and the stages of manipulation 01:26:41 Andrew Paquette on duplicate and "clone" voter registrations and the "spiral algorithm" 01:38:46 Ed Solomon presents cast vote record analysis and "synchronized rates of change" 01:51:48 Joseph Hoft on auditing standards, California voter rolls, and sampling in Orange County 01:58:34 Panelists' practical advice: vote in person on Election Day, hand counts, and reporting 02:06:46 Closing thoughts and case references from Paquette and Solomon 02:23:00 Introduction of Tina Peters 02:30:00 Peters on prison, her conviction, and her plan to petition the U.S. Supreme Court 02:44:00 Peters on White House meetings, hand-count plans, and reform proposals 03:00:00 Audience Q&A: spreading the word and collecting cast vote records 03:07:00 Discussion of a "clean slate," the administrative state, and subversion 03:14:00 Connecticut lawsuit and the role of cast vote records 03:21:00 How Trump won in 2016 and shifts in tactics since 03:36:00 Audience tributes and a question on journalism careers 03:49:00 Closing remarks, a gift to Logan, and final calls to action @americafirstwh @RalphPezzullo @KingSolomon006 @realtinapeters @PatriotMarkCook @realJoeHoft @GaryBerntsen @GoingRoguewLara

I want to thank Stewart for taking the time to communicate what’s going on at the BOS. He is committed to transparency. He stated on this town hall that he answers to us, not his colleagues or other politicians. He had some great updates. The one we are interested in - the “midnight” software update. According to Stewart. He (& everyone else) is satisfied with the answer given. A “bug” that allowed a “/“ in the file name. Several problems I see with this answer: 1. Stewart is not allowed in that room. All information he receives is from staff. 2. His chief of staff was present in the room & again, stated there was no software update. When we can clearly see there was. xitter.cf/wethepeopleaza1/status… 3. Stewart will not be getting definitive answers until after the election. Because it’s a busy time of year & pulling staff off to answer security questions is unreasonable - my words paraphrasing what he said. 4. Stewart erroneously has decided that since NOVUS doesn’t connect to tabulation there is no risk. NOVUS creates 2 digital images. The old & the new. The touch screen allows the election worker to select the necessary races. But Runbeck provides them with a pre-filled in ballot. The user only needs to select ok. Is this done by a bipartisan team. Pictures captured appear otherwise. In the past, duplicates were printed at Runbeck & left for pick up. The duplicate is never again compared to the original or stored with the original. Has that process changed? What has never been clarified: Does the digital image get uploaded to the EMS or just the machine readable information? We have been told that the duplicate gets scanned into the system. However, in 2022 logs show scanning duplicates AFTER certification. How does a certification happen without all the duplicates in? Printing at Runbeck & picking the ballots up to scan in the system seems highly inefficient to me. Considering the digital image is already produced. Certification was done - all the numbers in, correct? It seems to me that this log of duplicates scanned in a month after the election is an indication the ballot information is loaded to the EMS via USB. Why else would you need to transfer a USB from outside tabulation (duplication station) to inside the room & fix a “bug” that reads the file name. This brings up concerns - the digital duplicate can be anything. There is no way for the worker to know. The physical paper is never matched & compared. Even if they were, there is no way for the county to know what actually got loaded. This process needs very specific answers. Including whether it’s even legal. According to statute & EPM that say they must be done manually 5. Stewart said it took them 2 weeks to troubleshoot the naming issue. There are only so many reasons a file will not load in a system you have used for years. @ParikhClay @PatriotMarkCook are experts, but Ramirez has supposedly been at this a long time. 2 weeks seems unreasonable. Stewart’s chief of staff said a few days 🤔 6. Approximately at the 16 minute mark Stewart mentioned “snafus that have been happening for decades”. Our elections have been stolen for decades via backdoor access, insider threat & glitches. From what I can tell, Snafus” (glitch) are never resolved. Take the 19” ballot image on 20” piece of paper. The “investigation” never did resolve it. There are only so many ways that happens. And instead of taking a deeper look, they let it go on for 3 elections & then decided they needed to buy new equipment. The glitch is the rig. Venezuela programmers have told us they build in the glitch. 1) to introduce an update post certification 2) to switch/add/delete votes & 3) prevent votes from ever getting in. IMO glitches have been a complete failure of security & proper system evaluation because we have people that do not have the expertise to assess it.

@AZgopteam @SurgeShow @AZGOP FOLLOW THE MONEY — ARIZONA HOBBS support is California and Wisconsin, not grassroots AZ donors as she claims. Hobbs is selling AZ to the leftist agenda. The DGA pledged $10 MILLION to keep Katie Hobbs in office. Latest campaign-finance reporting: $14 MILLION spent. That’s 40% above the original commitment. Why are they spending so much, if she leading in the polls? Here are the players: Gretchen Whitmer — DGA Vice Chair Gavin Newsom — DGA Policy Chair DGA’s $4M top Q2 donor is run by Whitmer’s 2022 campaign manager DGA’s $2.26M #2 source, America Works USA, previously put $25K into Newsom’s inaugural fund Arizona voters deserve to know who is financing this operation, where the money is going, and what $14 million is buying. We know she caved to Newsom on windmills and water... What is Whitmer getting? CHECK FOR YOURSELF seethemoney.az.gov