L say ed needs to lose. The fake doctor....the fake politician. He's a pawn in Islam's plan to take america.
Van Jones: El-Sayed Needs to ‘Denounce’ ‘Dangerous’ Ad That Is Similar to His Statements
breitbart.com/clips/2026/10/…
I DO NOT want @IlhanMN to be imprisoned in the United States where she can radicalize inmates who will be back on our streets. If prison is called for, she needs to be either isolated or im Gitmo. I strongly favor her deportation back to the shit-hole she came from.
Trans-reality. It's a figment, not a fact.
facebook.com/share/v/1Fk975F…
This is horrifying
Abdul El-Sayed is visiting mosques and rallying Muslims to vote for him during Midterms. This is the Islamic Takeover of America
“We have that opportunity, insha'Allah, on November 3rd — You can go in and vote tomorrow. Make sure you, your wife, your husband, if you're a sister in the back, your mother, your father, your children if they're voting age, your neighbors have made a plan to vote on or before November 3rd. I'm gonna say that date one more time. The 3rd day of November.
“We cannot miss the opportunity. Again, we have a responsibility to lift our voices, and we have that opportunity, insha'Allah, on November 3rd. I'm asking you to lift that voice of yours.
Fight for the kind of America you believe in, an America that provides all the basic needs of a dignified life to our own people and does not take it away from other people. JazakAllahu Khairan. Again, my name is Abdul El-Sayed and I'm grateful for your support.”
This should horrify every American. He’s using mosques for his political agenda
Politicians are not supposed to go into places of worship and ask for votes. If the place of workshop allows it, legally they should lose their tax exempt status
Where is the accountability!?
The rule is Internal Revenue Code §501(c)(3), specifically the political campaign prohibition known as the Johnson Amendment
Allowing a candidate to use the organization’s facilities or events to campaign without equal opportunity for other candidates and distributing or publishing materials that favor or oppose candidates results in loss of tax exempt status
Using organizational resources like money, property, staff, lists and more to support or oppose a candidate also results in loss of tax exempt status
Strip this mosque of tax exempt status
Cold War Submarine Veteran retweeted
This is horrifying
Abdul El-Sayed is visiting mosques and rallying Muslims to vote for him during Midterms. This is the Islamic Takeover of America
“We have that opportunity, insha'Allah, on November 3rd — You can go in and vote tomorrow. Make sure you, your wife, your husband, if you're a sister in the back, your mother, your father, your children if they're voting age, your neighbors have made a plan to vote on or before November 3rd. I'm gonna say that date one more time. The 3rd day of November.
“We cannot miss the opportunity. Again, we have a responsibility to lift our voices, and we have that opportunity, insha'Allah, on November 3rd. I'm asking you to lift that voice of yours.
Fight for the kind of America you believe in, an America that provides all the basic needs of a dignified life to our own people and does not take it away from other people. JazakAllahu Khairan. Again, my name is Abdul El-Sayed and I'm grateful for your support.”
This should horrify every American. He’s using mosques for his political agenda
Politicians are not supposed to go into places of worship and ask for votes. If the place of workshop allows it, legally they should lose their tax exempt status
Where is the accountability!?
The rule is Internal Revenue Code §501(c)(3), specifically the political campaign prohibition known as the Johnson Amendment
Allowing a candidate to use the organization’s facilities or events to campaign without equal opportunity for other candidates and distributing or publishing materials that favor or oppose candidates results in loss of tax exempt status
Using organizational resources like money, property, staff, lists and more to support or oppose a candidate also results in loss of tax exempt status
Strip this mosque of tax exempt status
@NFL @MLB - Y'all are gonna find the @FBI digging into your shorts soon. Seems apparent that the #Leagues control the scores.
Betting line impacts from Sunday’s (Oct 25) and related high-profile calls
Packers @ Lions (Lions 20-17)
Pre-game the Lions were modest favorites (spread generally in the -2.5 to -3.5 range depending on book; totals mostly 50–55.5). Public money was mixed-to-Lions-leaning on the moneyline, with some reverse-line signals earlier in the week.
The controversial sequence of flags (two roughing-the-passer calls on Green Bay, the intentional grounding on Love, and especially the unnecessary roughness thrown by umpire Terry Killens from his back after being knocked down) occurred in a one-score game and directly altered field position and scoring opportunities.
Those calls created classic live-betting volatility:
A roughing or personal-foul flag that extends a drive or sets up a short-field touchdown can swing live spreads by 3–7 points and moneyline prices dramatically in seconds.
Bettors who had taken Packers +3.5 or the live underdog moneyline after Green Bay stayed close saw those tickets crushed by the very flags that kept Detroit’s drives alive.
The final margin (3 points) meant many close-spread tickets were decided by the cumulative effect of the disputed penalties rather than pure play on the field.
This is the typical pattern: pre-game lines already price some home/crew tendencies, but the actual high-leverage judgment calls hit the live market and result-bet holders hardest.
Browns @ Titans (Browns 27-24)
The apparent missed false start on Cleveland’s late drive (right tackle Dawand Jones appearing to jump early) allowed a 36-yard completion that set up the game-winning 32-yard field goal as time expired.
This is a pure result-flipping no-call:
A flagged false start would have pushed the Browns back five yards, likely changing the entire end-game sequence (possible punt, different FG distance, or overtime).
Live bettors on Titans moneyline, Titans +spread, or the under (depending on the timing) absorbed a direct loss from a non-call that the press box and multiple angles flagged immediately.
These late no-calls are especially costly because a large portion of the handle has already been taken pre-game or earlier in the game; the final-minute swing is pure variance created by officiating discretion.
World Series Game 2 (Brewers 5-4 over Rays)
The check-swing appeal on Yandy Díaz with the tying run on third ended the game. Check-swings remain non-reviewable (ABS only covers balls/strikes).
Impact:
Instant decision on the game winner and series lead (Brewers now 2-0).
Live game moneyline, run-line, and series odds all flipped on a single non-reviewable judgment.
Any live action on Rays to tie or force extras, or on Díaz to reach base, was decided by the first-base umpire’s eye rather than a challengeable call.
Broader pattern we’re tracking
High-leverage officiating (roughing, PI, false starts, clock/replay protocol, check-swings) rarely moves the opening line much—books already bake in crew tendencies and home bias. The real money movement and pain occurs in:
Live markets – flags that extend or kill drives create 5–10 point swings in seconds.
Close-game result tickets – 3-point or 1-run finals are routinely decided by one or two disputed calls.
Props tied to the affected drive (next score, team totals, player receiving/rushing in the sequence).
The Michigan extra-second play earlier this season and the Virginia Tech non-reviewable FG were textbook examples of the same phenomenon on the college side. Sunday’s NFL slate plus the World Series check-swing simply continued the pattern: the biggest financial impact lands on whoever is holding the live or close-result ticket when the flag (or no-flag) drops.
Want me to pull specific crew ATS/totals numbers for the Packers-Lions officials, or look at how ABS high-overturn umpires still create residual edges in MLB props now that the regular season is over?
Since when is demanding only American Citizens vote Subversion? Trump IS disenfranchising and deporting illegal aliens. @SenAdamSchiff has shit for brains.
Schiff: DOJ ‘Complicit’ in Trump’s Attempts to ‘Subvert the Elections’
breitbart.com/clips/2026/10/…
......and tomorrow the Jihadists will tear it down to the ground. The French appear willing to surrender their country.
Vive le NFL! Festive Crowd Defies French Rioters as Upbeat Paris Match Completed
breitbart.com/europe/2026/10…
Whst's the big deal? NGO's advertise for paid rioters in America - they even offer bail money! And BTW, wouldn't you like to see a prosperous and friendly Cubsn Government?
Cold War Submarine Veteran retweeted
President Trump @realDonaldTrump played a clip of all the times Abdul El-Sayed @AbdulElSayed refused to disavow Hasan Piker @hasanthehun.
It’s worth noting that powerful Senate Democrats like Elizabeth Warren @ewarren have also refused to disavow Abdul for associating with Piker.
The Senate Democrats own Hasan Piker and Abdul El-Sayed.
The elevator doors kept opening and closing today as Senator Elizabeth Warren @SenWarren attempted to flee questions from @LoomerUnleashed @TheCharlesDowns about whether she regrets supporting Jihadist US Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed @AbdulElSayed in light of his top campaign surrogate Hasan Piker @hasanthehun’s recent claim that “America is worse than al-Qaeda”.
After the doors reopened, we followed up, asking Warren:
“Do you have an answer?”
A staffer replied:
“She is busy.”
We then emphasized the importance of our question.
Naturally, Warren, a communist herself, didn’t care.
This is the same Elizabeth Warren who met with Abdul, and Americans for Justice in Palestine yesterday, a radical group led by Osama Abuirshaid @DrAbuIrshaid, an individual who refuses to condemn Hamas and the IRGC.
If the Democrats win the midterms in November, Warren will become incredibly powerful.
Why would anyone vote for the Democrats to control the Senate when they won’t even condemn Islamic terrorism?
Truly disqualifying and anti-American behavior!