Emmanuele (@Biotech2050) header
Emmanuele (@Biotech2050) profile picture

No investment advice. Do your own DD Market is all about taking the shares from the weak holders& providing opportunities to those that have the stamina to hold

Joined April 2014
Photo by Emmanuele (@Biotech2050)Photo by Emmanuele (@Biotech2050)Photo by Emmanuele (@Biotech2050)Photo by Emmanuele (@Biotech2050)Photo by Emmanuele (@Biotech2050)Photo by Emmanuele (@Biotech2050)Photo by Emmanuele (@Biotech2050)Photo by Emmanuele (@Biotech2050)Photo by Emmanuele (@Biotech2050)Photo by Emmanuele (@Biotech2050)
Replying to @RNAiAnalyst
Zero in Malta even on REALIZED CAPITAL GAINS provided you do not trade
1
3
1,587
Emmanuele retweeted
$TGTX great to see AZER CEL moving full steam ahead
$TGTX AZER CEL data even more impressive when you look at baseline of these hard to treat patients - All 26 participants had PIRA in the prior 12 months; all had prior anti-CD20 therapy
3
6
1
36
5,664
HCW $PGEN TOP PICK PT $18 re $INO
2
5
23
1,797
CITIZENS $PGEN Weakness following competitor approval is stark overreaction and presents compelling opportunity to buy $PGEN PAPZIMEOS complete response rate of 51% compared to 27% complete response rate achieved with VOCERYQ $INO PAPZIMEOS label also #broader than VOCERYQ
6
1
19
3,026
Emmanuele retweeted
$TGTX SUBq advantages resonating as Peter points out $TGTX has here with injections every 3 months vs every month with Kesimpta is significant. Based on the recent trial, Briumvi injection site reactions are a bit better than Kesimpta (needs to be confirmed in current trial). Offering the same drug as IV and SubQ is also an advantage - lets docs switch easily. Next, they can price at roughly same level as Kesimpta, which is currently priced significantly higher than Ocrevus (OK with insurers as save the outrageous costs of the IV). Kesimpta run rate is around $6 billion.
I think the best way to think about $TGTX SubQ is to compare the IV market and the SubQ market. In the IV market, Briumvi was up against an entrenched competitor with a massive sales force in Ocrevus. Both drugs are excellent - Briumvi (in my estimation) is only modestly better. The key dynamic here is that the IV market is very sticky - people only see their doc twice a year and so most just stay on their drug given it works well for most. So $TGTX priced lower and focused on gaining dynamic share, which is now around 50%, split 3 ways between naive, switches from other non-CD20's and switches from Ocrevus. But the overwhelming bulk of the IV market is still Ocrevus (pts stay on it an average of 5 years). SubQ is different. First, it's inherently much less sticky, with refills every 3 months. Next, the comparative advantage TGTX has here with injections every 3 months vs every month with Kesimpta is significant. Based on the recent trial, Briumvi injection site reactions are a bit better than Kesimpta (needs to be confirmed in current trial). Offering the same drug as IV and SubQ is also an advantage - lets docs switch easily. Next, they can price at roughly same level as Kesimpta, which is currently priced significantly higher than Ocrevus (OK with insurers as save the outrageous costs of the IV). Kesimpta run rate is around $6 billion. (Note TGTX margins currently artificially depressed because they are expensing inventory build for SubQ).
1
2
1
27
4,937
NEW: FDA has finalized guidance on potency assurance for cell & gene therapy products. This science- and risk-based framework helps ensure every CGT product lot delivered to patients is confirmed to work as intended — from early development through approval and patient delivery. fda.gov/news-events/press-an… #CellTherapy #GeneTherapy #CBER
6
29
7
94
9,317
$TGTX will host its Q3 2026 Earnings Call on Monday, Nov. 9, 2026 @ 8:30AM ET. To Join our Call - Dial in: 1-877-407-8029 (US), 1-201-689-8029 (Ex-US) Title: TG Q3 2026 - Webcast will be available at: ir.tgtherapeutics.com/events #FearlessForPatients #Earnings
6
4
27
3,988
Emmanuele retweeted
$TGTX SUBq Briumvi could be first &only anti-CD20 Tx for RMS pts that can be self-administered at home in a convenient quarterly dosing schedule vs QM subq Kesimpta,&could nearly double addressable Briumvi market opportunity to reach patients who prefer at home SC option, with limited internal switch from IV Briumvi- subq Briumvi could mostly gain share in subq segment w/ limited cannibalization on IV segment, given pt preference and current comp dynamics. $TGTX additional patents filed specifically for its SUBq formulation could extend exclusivity out to 2045 vs. current 2042, which is still under-estimated by Street
$TGTX Jefferies High Confidence into TGTX Ph3 Subq CD20 RMS Data ~YE26 + Market Oppy; PT ⬆️to $83 Based on recent subq Briumvi Ph1 bioavailability (BA) data, we conducted statistical analysis for potential Ph3 outcomes and concluded very high POS to meet 1EP GMR non-inferiority on 24wk AUC even w/ wide range of Briumvi BA scenarios, supporting favorable dosing profile vs. comp to gain meaningful market share in subq segment, which is still under-appreciated. update model to be more bullish on subq opportunity, leading to PT of $83 from $57.
5
8
52
7,767
Must read about $PGEN vs $INO Precigen dropped after hours on only 1 mil shares - classic take down liquidity grab on headline that FDA approved INO for RRP - but here is the real story on why this is not bad news for @Precigen This is like two players making it to majors & one is a bench player & one is an All Star - Not to mention the insurers already granted a permanent JCODE for reimbursement to PGEN as of april 1st 2026
2
4
18
2,562
Emmanuele retweeted
$TGTX @biomaven expert on COGS but important nugget many investors don’t realize is how profitable SUBq will become - same sales force etc - Peter I can’t find your tweet on this from the past
The two key charts from the $TGTX subq dosing trial. The AUC for the every 3 month dose is numerically modestly higher than the current IV every 6 months, and injection site reactions were extremely low and completely absent after the second dose. This is undoubtedly going to be a several billion dollar product. They have a clear advantage here over monthly Kesimpta, and pricing is very favorable for both the company and payors (avoids the high infusion charges).
2
5
1
39
8,679
Emmanuele retweeted
$TGTX 6 billion with quarterly in home SUBq along with IV doable - why models been going up recently
$TGTX Jeffries Upside Scenario, 6.8 Billion $98, +84% • IV Briumvi: US peak penetration of 35% in RMS and peak sales of ~$2.6B • SC Briumvi: 100% POS for US peak penetration of 35% and peak sales of ~$4.2B
4
6
36
5,720
Emmanuele retweeted
I think the best way to think about $TGTX SubQ is to compare the IV market and the SubQ market. In the IV market, Briumvi was up against an entrenched competitor with a massive sales force in Ocrevus. Both drugs are excellent - Briumvi (in my estimation) is only modestly better. The key dynamic here is that the IV market is very sticky - people only see their doc twice a year and so most just stay on their drug given it works well for most. So $TGTX priced lower and focused on gaining dynamic share, which is now around 50%, split 3 ways between naive, switches from other non-CD20's and switches from Ocrevus. But the overwhelming bulk of the IV market is still Ocrevus (pts stay on it an average of 5 years). SubQ is different. First, it's inherently much less sticky, with refills every 3 months. Next, the comparative advantage TGTX has here with injections every 3 months vs every month with Kesimpta is significant. Based on the recent trial, Briumvi injection site reactions are a bit better than Kesimpta (needs to be confirmed in current trial). Offering the same drug as IV and SubQ is also an advantage - lets docs switch easily. Next, they can price at roughly same level as Kesimpta, which is currently priced significantly higher than Ocrevus (OK with insurers as save the outrageous costs of the IV). Kesimpta run rate is around $6 billion. (Note TGTX margins currently artificially depressed because they are expensing inventory build for SubQ).
$TGTX @biomaven expert on COGS but important nugget many investors don’t realize is how profitable SUBq will become - same sales force etc - Peter I can’t find your tweet on this from the past
8
6
1
44
9,843
Emmanuele retweeted
$PGEN $INO Inovio has to run a placebo-controlled confirmatory trial it has not designed or started, fund it on a balance sheet that until tonight had about a quarter of cash, and recruit patients to a placebo arm now that the drug is available on prescription. And the FDA’s published efficacy figure is 27% with no surgery in year one, in the enriched subgroup, from an open-label 32-patient study. Precigen’s (PGEN) is about 51% complete response as the powered primary of a registrational trial, which the agency accepted as proof of benefit rather than a predictor of it.
Precigen $pgen overreaction to the $ino news. Their drug was not approved like Precigen’s is. Inovio still has work to do 👇 “The agency based this accelerated approval on clinical trial data showing Voceryq helps reduce the frequency of surgical procedures required to remove growths in adult patients with RRP — an intermediate clinical endpoint reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit. The accelerated approval pathway allows the FDA to approve drugs or biologics for serious or life-threatening conditions based on an effect on a surrogate or intermediate clinical endpoint reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit. The manufacturer must conduct post-approval clinical trials to verify and describe Voceryq’s clinical benefit.”
4
5
23
4,999
Emmanuele retweeted
$TGTX 1,000 of November $85 calls were bought for 35c. The only way it gets there is a BO in the next three weeks. I'll not be surprised if they PR earnings date today AH for Monday or Tuesday PM, minimum warning for the shorts. TGTX is surging, Heavy volume, a new 52 week high on a terrible tape. If they don't announce today, there may be a BO on Monday. 30M shares short, almost $2B.
6
3
1
28
6,235
$INO : The FDA decides today. My timeline is mostly debating whether INO-3107 works. The more useful question is which approval path the FDA takes, and there's a precedent in this exact disease that almost nobody is talking about. THE PRECEDENT In Aug 2025, $PGEN filed Papzimeos for accelerated approval. The FDA gave it full approval instead, no confirmatory trial required, on a single-arm study of 35 patients. So the FDA has already accepted single-arm data as enough in RRP. That's the bull case people miss: a traditional approval doesn't require beating an existing drug, just substantial evidence that yours works. THE CATCH INO-3107 is filed under accelerated approval. That pathway is meant for unmet need, and when an approved therapy exists, a new drug generally has to show a meaningful advantage over it. Papzimeos is now that therapy. That's why the FDA's filing letter flagged a preliminary concern about eligibility. In the Q2 update, Inovio said the FDA hadn't discussed it since, but told them feedback on the confirmatory trial design "would be forthcoming." Read that as the FDA working on an accelerated path with strings, not shutting the door. THE STRINGS Since FDORA (2022), the FDA can require the confirmatory trial to be underway before approval, or within a set time after. Its Jan 2025 draft guidance says "underway" means at least enrollment started and a credible completion timeline. For a company with $36.7M at June 30, ~$18.3M raised in July and ~$18M of quarterly burn, a randomized trial is a funding question, not a formality. THE DATA SIDE BY SIDE INO-3107, n=32: 28.1% needed no surgery (9/32), 81% had at least one fewer, ORR 72%. No treatment-related side effects above grade 2. About half surgery-free in year two. Papzimeos, n=35: 51% surgery-free in the 12 months after treatment (18/35), and 15 of 18 still in CR at 24 months. Not apples to apples: Precigen counted from after its 12-week dosing window, Inovio counts from day one. But the FDA will see the gap. THE STOCK ~103M shares plus up to ~98M from warrants, the July ones struck at $1.10. Above that, exercises add supply. Short interest ~20% of shares (Sept 30). Implied volatility around 250%. For scale: Precigen puts US adult RRP at ~27,000 patients, and Papzimeos did $53.1M in Q2. WHAT TO READ IN THE PRESS RELEASE 1. "Accelerated" or "approval" alone. Traditional approval is the best case. 2. "Confirmatory," and whether it has to be underway now. 3. The indication. Narrower than "adults with RRP" means a smaller market. A CRL citing eligibility means the FDA wants randomized data, and that's hard to fund from here. No position. #FDA #Biotech
3
1
4
2,026
$PGEN PAPZIMEOS delivers explosive commercial growth. FDA validates Precigen’s AdenoVerse platform. US market exclusivity, European expansion. Full breakdown oliviersevers.substack.com/p…
1
1
4
1,074
$INO crashing looks like CRL coming? re $PGEN
HCW raises $PGEN ($4.40) Price Target to $14 on Papzimeos market exclusivity re competitor = $INO
4
3
3
12
7,195
Emmanuele retweeted
$TGTX - market & many investors long/SHORT still not digested the implications of $TGTX having Q3m SUBq that can be given at home
The two key charts from the $TGTX subq dosing trial. The AUC for the every 3 month dose is numerically modestly higher than the current IV every 6 months, and injection site reactions were extremely low and completely absent after the second dose. This is undoubtedly going to be a several billion dollar product. They have a clear advantage here over monthly Kesimpta, and pricing is very favorable for both the company and payors (avoids the high infusion charges).
7
6
1
39
7,015
Emmanuele retweeted
$TGTX Jefferies PT $83 like the updates from TGTX at MSToronto. Azer-cel first-in-human allo CD19 CART in PMS data showed good tolerability/ safety &encouraging benefit. Still early days (no credit in current stock), this could evolve into a bigger story if efficacy/ durability continues. Subq Ph1 data continued to point to a potential Ph3 win ~'26/ '27.
$TGTX unreal to think we’re talking -REGISTRATION trials for something not ONE analyst had anything in their models for - but that’s what GREAT data in UNMET needs does - Q3 call in weeks. Azer & SUBq should dominate the call - I fully believe Weiss & $DTIL moves quickly as they can- Enthusiasm by DOCS & patients quickly growing
3
4
30
4,171
Emmanuele retweeted
$TGTX BRILEY PT $86 AZER CEL TGTX (Buy, $86 PT): Azer-cel’s first data show a clean safety profile, with efficacy now a function of dose &time. All 26 participants had progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) in the prior 12 months despite anti-CD20 therapy. They had a median of 3 prior therapies, a median age of 51.5, a median of 8.6 years since diagnosis, and a median EDSS of 6.0, split across PPMS (9), naSPMS (10), and active SPMS (7). CRS (2/26, Grade 1-2) and ICANS (2/26, Grade 1) showed no dose trend from DL1 (30M cells) to DL6 (500M cells). There was no immune effector cell-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like syndrome (IEC-HS), no graft-versus-host disease, no Grade 3 or higher infection, and 42.3% (11/26) of patients experienced Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent AEs and 15.4% (4/26) experienced serious AEs (4/26).
$TGTX AZER CEL data even more impressive when you look at baseline of these hard to treat patients - All 26 participants had PIRA in the prior 12 months; all had prior anti-CD20 therapy
3
8
3
30
11,222