₿itLift 🚀 0.1M (@BitLift) header
₿itLift 🚀 0.1M (@BitLift) profile picture

Your wingman down The #Bitcoin Rabbit Hole every day since 2013 🚀

Joined March 2011
Photo by ₿itLift 🚀 0.1M (@BitLift)Photo by ₿itLift 🚀 0.1M (@BitLift)Photo by ₿itLift 🚀 0.1M (@BitLift)Photo by ₿itLift 🚀 0.1M (@BitLift)Photo by ₿itLift 🚀 0.1M (@BitLift)Photo by ₿itLift 🚀 0.1M (@BitLift)Photo by ₿itLift 🚀 0.1M (@BitLift)Photo by ₿itLift 🚀 0.1M (@BitLift)
Still think “the cycle” is dead? From the ~$20k top in 2017 to the ~$69k top in 2021 took 1424 days. From the 2021 top to our latest ~$126k top? 1426 days! Predicting the date of the bottom is also shockingly simple 👇
1
2
1
18
4,162
Crypto is panicking over losing the beloved agentic commerce narrative. But it was never about agents spending your money, it was about agents spending theirs.
Now your dot can securely complete purchases on your behalf—with your approval. With ChatGPT Wallet, agents pay without access to your actual card details. Every purchase requires a security check. ChatGPT Wallet is rolling out starting today to dots, for Pro subscribers in the US. openai.com/index/introducing…
1
2
117
All this crazy shit had to happen. Because $BTC is suppose to bottom now, and nothing is wrong with bitcoin.
1
130
Crypto bros who pivoted to AI selling crypto to bail themselves out of AI?
3
137
₿itLift 🚀 0.1M retweeted
Bottoms are scary
1
2
200
Does it surprise you that there was a "major event" exactly when The Cycle predicts we should be bottoming, testing support at the previous cycle's all time high? If so, you're new here.
2
94
2023 vs 2026 bitcoin:native Golden Cross - 388 days in '23 vs looking like 296 days in '26 - Both occurred after a long sideways pattern followed by a violent breakout - '23 retested the 200 day 31 days later 👀 - 200 day also happened to be the previous cycle's high 👀
3
1
3
3,426
Time for this golden cross 200 day retest to play out 👀 - '23 31 days later - '26 63 days later
13
Bottoms are scary
1
2
200
₿itLift 🚀 0.1M retweeted
Replying to @mert
If only dollars were priced in sats
1
49
We might get it within a week
The same signal that called the top within a week says that TODAY is the bottom
89
Is binance the covid/ftx/bottom signal of this cycle?
1
138
Self custody isn’t safe. Exchanges aren’t safe. ETFs using exchanges who self custody makes the most sense.
1
3
154
₿itLift 🚀 0.1M retweeted
Long $AAPL @ $320 Short $GOOG @ $320 Check back in 2030
1
1
133
The same signal that called the top within a week says that TODAY is the bottom
Replying to @BitLift
Just take the averages of past cycles and carry them forward: For the coming cycle, aka Boom5, we get: Top to bottom: - 2013: 410 days - 2017: 363 days - 2021: 376 days - 2025: ~383 days (Oct 24th 2026) Bottom to new high: - 2013: 771 days - 2017: 732 days - 2021: 716 days - 2025: ~740 days (Nov 2nd 2028) New high to top: - 2013: 297 days - 2017: 329 days - 2021: 334 days - 2025: ~320 days (Sept 18th 2029)
1
1
173
Sucks that this cycles FUD comes at the expense of hodlers
1
1
2
142
₿itLift 🚀 0.1M retweeted
Replying to @maikaisogawa
social crypto never should have been about money — it’s about giving our voice/identity the same trustless, permissionless, immutable qualities that Satoshi gave to money
1
42
This Justin Drake tweet has me questioning — do algos control the narrative? or do we?
3
84
Last cycle, it took 4x to recover to ATH. An epic run, and maybe why we stalled out? This cycle 2x, then blue skies.
3
82
AI yield farming days are over. No more incentive programs. But at least the 5 hr unstaking period is being removed.
Hi, Tomorrow we are re-opening the Pro $200 subscriptions to new subscribers, but together with it we are also changing how we calculate the usage for it. In effect, if you do the math, it will net out at half the dollar in API spend compared to the old Pro $200 plan. Now that it's said, let me explain why this is happening and why you will still get more work done than if you were on the Pro $200 subscription one month ago. (a) We didn't want to compromise in other ways and are committing to not reintroducing the 5h limit, so that you can fully use the weekly usage when you want. (b) On the subscription, we guarantee that over time you always get more work done and with an increasing level of quality. This means that you will continue to get more value per dollar spent as a result of models getting more efficient and us passing down the improvements in the form of API price reductions. (c) We don't want to put an incentive on ourselves to artificially inflate the API list prices to make it look like you are getting a lot (and workaround it through discounts, etc). Instead we want to continue to both rapidly reduce prices and increase capabilities of models on the API. This week we introduced GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna at 50% of their previous price. Over time, we see prices go low enough that it makes sense for most to buy usage as needed without there being a significant gap between what you get in a subscription and what you get in the API for a dollar spent. (d) Tomorrow, we are adding more things to the subscription that won't draw on the usage, I won't reveal what that is yet. I wanted to be transparent before all the big announcements tomorrow. Lots of new exciting things are coming to the subscriptions that will make it super compelling, but I wanted to make sure to share this change ahead of time so you can all understand it before we shower you with good news. Codexingly, Tibo
1
1
104
The prophecy still says bull market comes after October
Still think “the cycle” is dead? From the ~$20k top in 2017 to the ~$69k top in 2021 took 1424 days. From the 2021 top to our latest ~$126k top? 1426 days! Predicting the date of the bottom is also shockingly simple 👇
1
78
Switched back to iPhone after 13 years on Android. It wouldn’t let me use the @coinbase app I had installed. Guess a few things have changed since then @brian_armstrong @FEhrsam?
3
1
1
156