
Queer. Feminist. Medievalist. she/they. Author: Digital Codicology. Co-PI: ‘Always Here: a Queer+Trans Global Medieval Sourcebook.' Coiner of the #CaswellTest.
Joined August 2013
- Tweets11.6K
- Following2.6K
- Followers2.2K
- Likes36.2K
Pinned Tweet
Digital Codicology's price in hardcover is steep ($80)
I'm sorry about that, and wish there were a cheaper paperback available! (Maybe in a few years, if sales are strong enough?)
In the meantime, you can get 20% off ($64) when you buy from SUP & use my author code: WHEARTY20
Bridget Whearty 🏳️🌈 retweeted
Something very, very exciting is happening @britishlibrary
Medieval Women: In Their Own Words, our new major exhibition, opens on 25 October
Get your tickets now, they're cheaper than #Oasis and more chance of encountering Margery Kempe 😉
blogs.bl.uk/digitisedmanuscr…
Bridget Whearty 🏳️🌈 retweeted
My book All Boys Aren’t Blue has had 7 criminal charges, and is virtually banned in all high school libraries in Texas, Florida, Georgia and Iowa (where an educator can go to jail for a year with a 1500 fine to give it to a “minor”)
Fight for the right to read
You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
This article is about massive flight delays in Europe. But it’s definitely applicable to the US.
Recommended reading if you, like me, are currently sitting on the runway because (as the pilot is saying) understaffing in American air traffic control means your plane can’t launch
Air traffic control issues risk disrupting summer travel, warn airlines ift.tt/5YzDjKw
Bridget Whearty 🏳️🌈 retweeted
Replying to @BridgetWhearty
Tell them you have important codicological questions and/or need to recheck the collation. It won’t be a lie!
Bridget Whearty 🏳️🌈 retweeted
Replying to @BridgetWhearty @GabbyStorey
Indeed - sometimes digital images are easier to read than originals (though I remember facsimiles of microfiche ... eek!). It's having both available that counts.
Bridget Whearty 🏳️🌈 retweeted
Replying to @BridgetWhearty @GabbyStorey
Materiality - letterlocking, water damage, uninked writing, seal quality, digital flattening ... the list goes on ... it's not just about bookfondling (though that is part of it ...)
Bridget Whearty 🏳️🌈 retweeted
Replying to @BridgetWhearty @GabbyStorey
Would suggest you need to examine the paper stock, ink qualities etc? Clues to watermarks?
I’ll never forget my tactile connection with the past when unfolding a pack of previously unread ordination papers & letters. Had to surreptitiously dab my eyes! 🥲😃
Bridget Whearty 🏳️🌈 retweeted
A reminder to any undergraduate/graduate students focused on disability studies or disability history: I'm happy to look over your grad school apps, do informational interviews, or look at grant/fellowship materials. 1/
Bridget Whearty 🏳️🌈 retweeted
Replying to @BridgetWhearty
You need to engage with the materiality-texture, watermarks, inclusions, page dirt, co-binding, damage…digital imagery doesn’t serve any of these queries. And IKWYM-“Why do you need to see THIS copy of the Nuremberg Chronicle?”. I get the preservation instinct, but yeesh.
Bridget Whearty 🏳️🌈 retweeted
would love to read a collection of people's 'how it moves / feels / I just want to touch this thing / mystical reasons I can barely articulate / aura desire materiality' justifications
like a long prose poem, w glimpses of gold & parchment & binding & ink flickering in and out
Replying to @BridgetWhearty
It’s funny to have written a wholeass book about digitization — and be asked ‘can’t you just use the digital object’ and be like ‘well… maybe? But I also just want to touch this thing 🤷🏻 because mystical reasons I can barely articulate? Because aura, desire, materiality?’
4/4
Bridget Whearty 🏳️🌈 retweeted
Replying to @GabbyStorey @BridgetWhearty
Quires. I've never been denied access. One curator once told me they'd do it for me, I politely refused and brought my case forward abt why one doing it oneself is crucial.
Bridget Whearty 🏳️🌈 retweeted
Replying to @BridgetWhearty @GabbyStorey
Also, any signs of correction, self-correction by the scribe, different ink etc etc can easily just be missed in a copy.















