
Virtual Maths and Sciences Tutor | 11 years experience | Christianity | Education I tutor kids in Elementary, Middle, and High School. @Insight_Tutors_
Benin City,Nigeria.
Joined December 2010
- Tweets26.9K
- Following1K
- Followers945
- Likes20.9K
Pinned Tweet
Football returns tomorrow, so here are a few things;
- I support Chelsea and any team playing against Manchester United, Liverpool, Manchester City, and Arsenal.
- I idolize Lionel Messi and I have an agenda against Kai Havertz, Madueke, and Mason mount.
Thank you.
Since I began online tutoring, I have never disappointed A SINGLE PARENT.
I give my best. I go the extra mile.
We give our best at @Insight_Tutors_
Tutor David retweeted
Regardless of what anyone thinks of the Iran war, a president saying he would do what he thinks is right for the country regardless of short term political fallout is very refreshing.
.@POTUS: "I think it's largely true because it drove the gasoline up... At the same time, if I had to do it again, I'd have to do it again because long-term, it's the only answer. You can't let Iran have a nuclear weapon."
Tutor David retweeted
Mr. Vice-President,
Please allow me to present a different perspective.
The problem was not the Iran War. It was the cease fire.
If you start a war, you need to win it and finish it – otherwise don’t start it.
This war should have been over six months ago, with the Strait of Hormuz wide open and oil flowing. The second and third tiers of Iranian leadership should have been destroyed, and we should have supported the pro-western forces who could have taken leadership. We stood on the brink of a new, more peaceful Middle East - and then we blinked. We had a chance not only to deny Iran nuclear weapons, but to get rid of the world’s biggest supporter of terrorism.
Instead, we had a cease fire, which was followed by months of will we or won’t we finish the job. Every day was a different message. There still is. Is the war over? Is it about to begin? No one knows. There is confusion and inconsistency.
In June 2025, America was not involved. This was an Israel vs Iran issue.
No one forced the United States to attack Iran then, or in February of 2026. It was a decision made by President Trump. In my opinion, it was the right decision.
Once the decision was made, we should not have stopped until the regime fell. But instead, you negotiated a cease fire that didn’t last, didn’t work and left us in no man’s land, with higher prices and our troops still deployed.
Our troops could have been home, the Navy returned to its bases, a peaceful regime in place , new alliances forged, and gas prices below $3.00 a gallon.
No, Mr. Vice President. It’s not the war. It’s the so-called cease fire.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
It is funny how TB Joshua's followers struggle to validate a false prophet and a deceiver
This condolence letter from Pastor Adeboye is just one of their few weak attempts
For the records, here is the drama and background behind this reluctant condolence letter.
🧵 teapawt.org/TGNLEAD/status/2117330…
It is important to note that Pastor Adeboye had previously vowed never to associate with TB Joshua during a 2009 interview with Vanguard newspaper journalists - Sam Eyoboka and Ebun Babalola.
vanguardngr.com/2021/07/adeb…
Despite the condolence letter, Pastor Adeboye and the RCCG never sent a delegation to the burial of TB Joshua.
Again, for obvious reasons.
Pastor Adeboye was the first person (in 2009), to publicly reveal that TB Joshua was never born again.
Read here.
Not even Ronald Reagan.
No US president has ever won midterm elections
Not even Obama
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Several US presidents' parties have gained seats in midterm elections, such as FDR's Democrats (+9 House and +9 Senate in 1934) and George W. Bush's Republicans (+8 House and +2 Senate in 2002). Obama's Democrats lost seats in both 2010 and 2014.
presidency.ucsb.edu/statistics/dat…
davemanuel.com/us-midterm-ele…
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1934_Unit…
HyperGrace is a disease.
1)Who was Jesus talking to?
2)What culture was Jesus trying to address and rewire?
3)When was it said? Before resurrection or after.
4)What established doctrine is particularly corrected?
1) In Matthew 19:39 and Mark 10:2–12, Jesus was directly answering a group of Pharisees who approached Him with a trick question: "Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any and every reason?
2) The culture Jesus was particularly addressing was in Deut 24:1
3) Jesus spoke these strict words before the Resurrection to an unbelieving, hard-hearted culture that lacked the Holy Spirit. However, the Resurrection changed everything. Today, when the Church faces marital brokenness, we do not just apply a rigid, pre-resurrection rule; we apply the complete knowledge of Christ and the wisdom of God given to us through His resurrection. The Resurrection gives us the spiritual maturity to evaluate each situation through the lens of grace, redemption, and the totality of Christ's character, rather than just a legalistic commandment, there is a wide scope of knowledge in Christ, to compare and cross-reference, based on the circumstances of the situation.
4) The doctrine Jesus was correcting was the selfish act of men, who divorce their wives because they suddenly don't look attractive to them anymore. I will just let her go and marry another woman; that was the mentality Jesus was correcting.
There is a way a church should look. According to whom?
If it's according to scripture, then the architectural masterpieces you people are clamouring for are in violation.














