Talking about the hottest cases affecting politics, culture, and everyone’s daily lives in a way everyone can understand.
Washington D.C.
Joined May 2017
- Tweets999
- Following254
- Followers3.5K
- Likes325
Case in Point: The Legal Show for Regular People retweeted
podcasts.apple.com/us/podcas…
Case in Point-Violence in Politics – Follow the Money!
Guest is Ryan Mauro, investigator for Capital Research Center, to discuss findings on funding of extremists like Antifa undermining democratic process by instigating violence in our streets
Case in Point: The Legal Show for Regular People retweeted
The Babylon Bee was put in Twitter jail for calling a man a man. Elon Musk spent $43 billion to bail them out, and although they can make jokes on X again, the fight to stop the Left’s assault on humor and free speech is far from over.
Listen to the latest episode of the Case in Point podcast with @SethDillon here 👉 heritage.org/caseinpoint
Case in Point: The Legal Show for Regular People retweeted
Trump voters were threatened w/death in PA in 2024-law enforcement did NOTHING!! podcasts.apple.com/us/podcas…
Case in Point: The Legal Show for Regular People retweeted
Rundown Of The Court Fights Trump Has Won So Far thefederalist.com/2025/06/12…
Case in Point: The Legal Show for Regular People retweeted
AP may be back in WH, but they can be totally ignored per court order washingtontimes.com/news/202… if AP quit being so biased, folks might trust their reporting again
Case in Point: The Legal Show for Regular People retweeted
@CaseinPointPod - glad to announce I’ll be hosting a podcast on the hottest legal cases in the news that affect our politics, culture, and families, starting this week. 1st show will be “The Game of Risk: When Judges Think They’re Admirals.” Tune in!
Case in Point: The Legal Show for Regular People retweeted
This is the best way to fix nationwide injunctions.
@GCCanaparo heritage.org/courts/commenta…
Case in Point: The Legal Show for Regular People retweeted
There have been fewer than 200 nationwide injunctions issued in the history of the United States. Almost all of them have been issued in the last 20 years, with the majority of recent injunctions being issued against President Trump. They’re almost all unlawful.
Listen to this full episode of the Heritage Explains podcast on nationwide injunctions here 👉 heritage.org/heritage-explai…
@HvonSpakovsky
Case in Point: The Legal Show for Regular People retweeted
The Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic case isn’t complicated. South Carolina is entirely within its right to restrict Planned Parenthood from receiving Medicaid funding.
@SarahPPerry
Case in Point: The Legal Show for Regular People retweeted
The FACE Act is an ideological weapon designed to suppress ordinary pro-life activity and expression. It must be repealed.
@SarahPPerry
RT @SarahPPerry: Stone cold killer.
That a first day on the job, @PamBondi
This quoted post is unavailable.
Case in Point: The Legal Show for Regular People retweeted
When I entered the first @POTUS administration, our job was clear: ensure Title IX provided equal footing for both women & men. We sought to protect the gains of women who fought for its passage in 1972 & ensure sports remained sex-separated
Today, that mission will be fulfilled
Case in Point: The Legal Show for Regular People retweeted
This is Curtrina Martin & her son.
A few years ago, the FBI set off a grenade in their home & smashed the door in. But their suspect wasn't there. Because the FBI had the wrong house.
The family was barred from suing—and the Supreme Court just agreed to hear the case. A thread.
Case in Point: The Legal Show for Regular People retweeted
What's on tap for SCOTUS this month? ⚖️
Two huge cases will be argued--both, with major implications for online media/tech platforms.
And in both, the First Amendment will play a central role.
🧵
Case in Point: The Legal Show for Regular People retweeted
All things election-related with former Federal Election Commissioner Hans von Spakovsky on this week's Case in Point.
🗳️ NEW EPISODE: The Little Landslide That Could: Election Integrity and Decision 2024
This week on Case in Point, and only hours after one of the most significant Republican sweeps in a generation, we sit down with @HvonSpakovsky, Senior Manager of Heritage's Election Law Reform Initiative.
Hans offers his thoughts on the landmark 2024 election, the likelihood of future litigation on political races, the Supreme Court's election-related emergency docket orders, and why election integrity should matter to every American.
Case in Point: The Legal Show for Regular People retweeted
🇺🇸A NEW DAY DAWNING:
President-elect Trump has a plan to save children from gender mutilation, revoke executive orders based on junk science, investigate big pharma for their coverup on “gender affirming” medical care for children, & define sex once & for all.
Swords up! ⚔️
This is a strong statement from @realDonaldTrump to put an end to the gender madness. I fully support it, and hope I can help his administration make this a reality.
teapawt.org/HazelAppleyard_/status…
Case in Point: The Legal Show for Regular People retweeted
Another fab piece of news from Tuesday--"ranked choice voting" looks to be flaming out badly on ballot initiatives--Idaho, Colorado, Oregon, and currently losing in Montana. An Alaska initiative to repeal its own RCV is ahead in polls. This despite millions to push the scheme.
Case in Point: The Legal Show for Regular People retweeted
BREAKING - and not a moment too soon:
By a vote of 6-3, SCOTUS allows Virginia to purge its voter rolls of illegal aliens prior to the general election on Tuesday. Conservatives in the majority with liberals in dissent. politico.com/news/2024/10/30…
Case in Point: The Legal Show for Regular People retweeted
My home state's public-school machinery is irrevocably lost to gender activists. This is a misuse of taxpayer dollars.
What's more? The English literacy rate in the Old-Line State is an abysmal 20%. TWENTY. PERCENT.
Maryland is failing our kids. But boy, they're nailing gender idiocy
