Real medicine really works. Advancing evidence-based medicine and classical liberal values. Not medical advice.
Colorado, USA
Joined October 2024
- Tweets2.5K
- Following298
- Followers2.4K
- Likes36.6K
Pinned Tweet
THE BIG FOUR’S COLORADO BLUEPRINT: How Four Wealthy Donors Flipped a Red State (and Artificially Accelerated Transgender and Gender Identity Policies Through Massive Funding, Not Grassroots Momentum)
Picture Colorado in the summer of 2004: a solidly Republican state where the GOP controlled the governor’s mansion, both legislative chambers, most congressional seats, and key statewide offices. Four wealthy Democrats: Tim Gill, Pat Stryker, Jared Polis, and Rutt Bridges, gathered quietly and launched what they called “The Blueprint.” It wasn’t a spontaneous uprising of everyday voters but a calculated, venture capital-style operation funded by their personal fortunes. As detailed in the 2010 book 'The Blueprint' by Adam Schrager and former Republican legislator Rob Witwer, the 2014 documentary 'Rocky Mountain Heist', and Jennifer Bilek’s 2020 First Things article “The Billionaires Behind the LGBT Movement,” this effort first seized political power for the Democrats in recent times in Colorado. Then it built a sophisticated funding machine that critics say unnaturally and artificially propelled transgender and gender identity policies forward: not through broad, organic grassroots support from ordinary people, but through coordinated billions from a handful of ultra-wealthy donors operating largely out of public view.
What started as targeted electoral spending evolved into a top-down philanthropy network that amplified “gender identity ideology” globally and in Colorado law. Early gay rights efforts had roots in small, community-driven groups facing real stigma. After gay marriage become legal, the push for transgender policies appeared to be a natural next step - but it was heavily engineered by elite money, secretive strategy sessions, and international channels. The result? Rapid policy changes that many feel outpaced public consensus.
The Gang of Four and the 2004 Electoral “Heist”
The group, nicknamed the “Gang of Four” or “Four Horsemen", bypassed traditional party structures by forming the Colorado Democracy Alliance. They funneled millions through 527 independent-expenditure groups, voter-turnout operations, and aligned nonprofits, treating politics like a startup investment.
- Tim Gill, Quark software founder, sold his stake in 1999 for about $500 million. Motivated by Colorado’s 1992 Amendment 2 (an anti-gay measure later overturned), he endowed the Gill Foundation with roughly $200 million (inflation-adjusted) for LGBT causes. It has since granted hundreds of millions more to the transgender cause.
- Pat Stryker, medical-device heiress to Stryker Corporation, channeled funds through her Bohemian Foundation.
- Jared Polis, openly gay ProFlowers entrepreneur (now Colorado’s governor since 2019), and Rutt Bridges, software & petroleum entrepreneur, completed this quartet.
In 2004, their donations overwhelmed Republicans: Stryker spending over $850,000, Gill nearly $775,000, Polis and Bridges over $400,000 each. Of $3.6 million in 527 organizations spending, nearly two-thirds came from these four. Democrats flipped both legislative chambers, for the first time in decades. By 2006, they added the governorship and more seats. Total early spending exceeded $20 million, locking in a Democratic “trifecta” that has endured for two decades.
'The Blueprint' explains the mechanics in plain terms: dubiously-funded nonprofits, targeted ads, and ground games that caught the GOP flat-footed. The 'Rocky Mountain Heist' documentary calls it a “heist” by a “shadowy cabal,” visualizing a “blue blob” spreading from Colorado as a warning of national replication.
The Funding Pipeline: From Electoral Power to LGBT Philanthropy
Bilek’s article ties this political takeover directly to LGBT advocacy. Gill and Pat Stryker, with the two other wealthy philanthropists used “ruthless political strategies” to turn Colorado blue while directing roughly half a billion dollars into groups advancing LGBT agendas. Gill introduced Pat’s brother Jon Stryker (openly gay man) at the 2015 GLSEN Respect Awards, recalling how they had “plotted, schemed, hiked and skied together” while “punishing the wicked and rewarding the good.”
Jon Stryker founded the Arcus Foundation in 2000. It poured $58.4 million into LGBT programs from 2007–2010 alone; with Jon personally giving over $30 million from Stryker stock. The family company, started by their grandfather, hit $25.1 billion in annual revenue in 2025 (up 11.2% from 2024), with deep roots in surgical supplies and medical tech. Bilek highlights this medical industry backdrop as relevant context for the scale of later funding priorities.
The Artificial Pivot from Gay Rights to Transgender and Gender Identity Push
Here is where the “not grassroots” reality becomes clearest. Early gay-rights activism grew organically from small communities facing discrimination. But after same-sex marriage victories, the focus shifted dramatically to transgender issues and gender identity ideology. Bilek documents how Arcus and Gill networks built on the Colorado donors’ infrastructure artificially accelerated this through top-down philanthropy, not widespread public demand or bottom-up organizing.
In 2008, Arcus hosted a key meeting in Bellagio, Italy, with 29 international leaders (including Jon Stryker). Michael O’Flaherty (rapporteur for the 2006 Yogyakarta Principles, which applied international human rights law to sexual orientation and gender identity) attended. Bilek notes the Principles “planted the seeds to bring in and attach gender-identity ideology to our legal structures.” O’Flaherty, a former UN Human Rights Committee member, is now Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe, in office at his new job since April 2024, based in Strasbourg.
From Bellagio emerged the LGBT Movement Advancement Project (MAP) to coordinate advocacy on gender identity in law, education, and culture. The LGBTI Core Group, an informal UN-linked network of member states (including the U.S., U.K., France, Germany, and the Office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights) formed with Arcus-funded participants like OutRight Action International. Arcus also backed the U.N with funding, alongside Amnesty International and GLSEN. Grants targeted Transgender Europe, ILGA, the Transgender Law Center, ACLU, Center for American Progress, and the 2015 Global Trans Initiative (at least $20 million committed and surpassed). These programs trained activists in “political activism, leadership, transgender law, religious liberty, education, and civil rights.”
The pattern is clear: This is not a natural evolution driven by everyday people. It is a billionaire-orchestrated infrastructure with half a billion spent in Colorado alone, plus hundreds of millions more donated strategically globally from Arcus and Gill, that manufactured rapid cultural and policy acceptance. Public perception framed it as organic “progress,” as meant, but the funding records, donor quotes, and coordinated meetings reveal a top-down strategy using wealth to bypass traditional grassroots organizing.
Colorado as the Proof: Policies Under Governor Polis
With the political safe haven secured, one of the original Four, Jared Polis, became governor in 2019. The Democratic trifecta delivered swift transgender policies:
- 2019 (Jude’s Law / HB 19-1039): Simplified gender marker changes on birth certificates (M/F/X) with no surgery, doctor’s note, or court order required; banned conversion therapy for minors.
- 2025 (Kelly Loving Act / HB 25-1312): Signed by Polis on May 16, 2025 (effective October 1, 2026), it expands anti-discrimination laws to treat intentional deadnaming or misgendering as discriminatory in workplaces, schools, and public settings; eases name/gender document changes.
- Early 2026: Bills advanced to seal minors’ name-change records for privacy.
These built directly on the donor-funded base. What feels unnatural to many was how quickly policies advanced once the money secured the levers of power. It also bring up the ethics and moral foundation of a governor like Jared Polis, who seems to have funded himself to immense power with false equivalence to an organically elected official.
The Deceit Debate: Manufactured Momentum vs. True Civil Rights
Trans rights activists call the moves of the Big Four savvy advocacy for equality. Opponents argue they are inherently deceptive. The trans/gender identity movement publicly appears as grassroots civil rights evolution. In reality, it seems driven by a tiny circle of billionaires using secretive roundtables, dark money, and philanthropy to scale ideology (including UN human rights channels), like they manipulated Colorado’s politics. The half-billion-dollar figure, Gill’s “plotted and schemed” quote, Arcus’s medical-fortune ties, and the Bellagio-to-UN pipeline all point to manufactured momentum rather than broad societal demand. Colorado served as the perfect laboratory before national and global export.
The Legacy of Deceit:
Two decades on, Colorado remains Democratic-controlled. The model inspired donor networks elsewhere. Gill and Arcus foundations continue granting millions annually. U.S. LGBTQ philanthropy totaled $209.4 million in 2023, with trans-specific funding still prominent. Polis is still governor of colarado, though his term ends in November 2026 and cannot be elected again. Whether you see the Big Four as visionary or elite operators, their 2004 effort of electoral flip plus sustained, targeted use of millions of dollars, clearly and unnaturally accelerated transgender and gender identity policies far beyond what organic grassroots movements alone could have achieved. It remains a case study in how concentrated wealth can reshape law, culture, and international norms. The question is, what are you going to do about it? Stay silent as the transgender industry and those standing to profit sway policy, or righteously fight the power?
REFERENCES (verified as of April 2026)
1. Schrager, Adam, and Rob Witwer - The Blueprint* (2010).
2. Rocky Mountain Heist (2014).
3. Bilek, Jennifer @bjportraits: “The Billionaires Behind the LGBT Movement.” published in First Things, January 21, 2020.
4. Arcus Foundation grant records and Global Trans Initiative updates (2007–2025).
5. Stryker Corporation 2025 revenue annual results
6. Colorado legislative records: Jude’s Law (2019); Kelly Loving Act (HB 25-1312, signed May 2025)
7. Council of Europe: Michael O’Flaherty Commissioner records and 2026 activities.
8. Gill Foundation and LGBTQ funders tracking reports (2023–2025).
All details cross-checked against public records, foundation filings, legislative histories, and recent reporting for accuracy.
#Colorado #Politics #Policy #BigFour #FourHorsemen #ethics #JaredPolis #VOTE #Republican #Democrat #ballot #elections
PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT (PSA): Anyone who went to medical school (or has seen other humans naked a few times) would immediately be able to tell if what they are seeing is an inverted penis meant to mimic a vagina, or an actual vagina. They would even be able to tell blindfolded with touch alone. This has nothing to do with how good a surgeon is, and everything to do with anatomy. The root of the penis is anchored to the anterior aspect and inferior margin of the pubic symphysis by supporting structures, including the suspensory and fundiform ligaments. The penile shaft emerges immediately beneath the pubic arch, placing its exit point very close to the inferior border of the pubic symphysis, usually within 0 to1 cm. In contrast, the vaginal opening is located posteriorly, farther back toward the spine. In the female pelvis, the clitoris and urethral opening lie anterior to the vaginal opening, with the urethra positioned between the pubic symphysis and the vagina. This puts the distance from the inferior pubic arch to the vaginal opening at approximately 2.5 to 4 cm. So basically, the principal anatomical distinction is that the penile root is closely associated with the pubic symphysis, whereas the vaginal opening is situated farther posteriorly. When a man is lying down, legs towards you in supine position, and has an imitation "vagina" fashioned from his penis, the entrance would be facing upwards, exactly where his penis would otherwise emerge. A woman with a real vagina, on the other hand, would have the entrance facing towards you.
TL;DR: You can ALWAYS tell the difference based on the position of the "hole" because male and female anatomy are fundamentally different. A doctor who pretends they can't tell the difference is lying to you.
Colorado Principled Physicians retweeted
"We the people have the power to protect girls' sports and spaces. We don't need a governor; we can do it ourselves by voting YES on Prop 134." — Megan Burke, Co-Founder of Athletes for Action & 2-Time NCAA Champion 🏃♀️🏆
Girls across Colorado are quitting sports because they are being forced to compete against boys, taking away their confidence, opportunities, and future leadership skills.
Stand up for our daughters' future! 👟✨🏆
Vote YES on PROP 134
Colorado Principled Physicians retweeted
"Girls aged eight to sixteen were “terrified” to learn that they would be sharing a locker room with a 50-year-old transgender" (male)
This his how trans harms girls and women. 🚩
nbcmontana.com/news/nation-w… #trans #Canada #WomensRights
Colorado Principled Physicians retweeted
LGBTQ activist has a deer-in-headlights moment when Piers Morgan asks her to explain what “non-binary” actually means.
When she can’t, she calls it “uncomfortably personal.” Then Riley Gaines finishes her off.
PIERS MORGAN: “I just want to ask, what do you mean by non-binary?”
ACTIVIST: “Um when I say I’m non-binary, I’m expressing my identity in a way that I have the right to do.”
PIERS MORGAN: “What does that mean? There’s only one of you.”
ACTIVIST: “Actually, they/them has been the collective they has been used to refer to individual people for centuries and still is. So, um, I mean, if you don’t understand basic grammar, that’s on you.”
PIERS MORGAN: “I’ve got to be honest with you, I don’t understand the concept of what non-binary means… There’s one of you sitting here, and you look to me female. You’re a female?”
ACTIVIST: “If you don’t understand what non-binary means…”
PIERS MORGAN: “Are you a female?”
ACTIVIST: “…then I’m not sure you’re in a position to lead a debate…”
PIERS MORGAN: “But if you can’t explain it in simple language, then what’s the point?”
ACTIVIST: “I don’t think that I’m here to discuss the contents of my identity.”
PIERS MORGAN: “You raised this whole thing. I didn’t mention anything about what you were. You did.”
ACTIVIST: “This has really become uncomfortably personal.”
PIERS MORGAN: “Has it? You said it, not me…”
That’s when Riley Gaines dropped the hammer.
RILEY GAINES: “If you think this is uncomfortably personal, try undressing in a locker room with a 6’4 naked man.”
Colorado Principled Physicians retweeted
It’s strange, isn’t it? When we talk about the Post Office scandal, everyone agrees it was a horrific series of miscarriages of justice. Innocent people had their lives and reputations destroyed. Some were imprisoned. Some took their own lives. Others died still living under the cloud of false accusations.
Whistleblowers were ignored. Alarm bells rang. Politicians put their fingers in their ears. And the suffering continued.
Nobody disputes that this was a terrible scandal.
But what if I told you that another horrifying scandal is unfolding right now, one that is arguably even worse?
What if I told you that vulnerable children are being harmed, their lives irrevocably changed by healthcare professionals following an ideology promoted by government, the media, schools and corporations?
And that, despite the evidence being publicly available, most people have little idea of the scale of the harm, how many children have already been affected or how many continue to be harmed?
How many people know that @nickwallis, the investigative journalist who played a pivotal role in exposing the Post Office scandal, is now investigating this issue, believing it’s a “huge” story.
I’m talking, of course, about trans ideology. The brainwashing of vulnerable children into believing there are multiple genders, that they may have been born in the wrong body, and that life-altering medication or even surgery might make them happier.
This has been going on for years, and it is happening now.
The BBC has been front and centre in promoting this ideology. A generation of young people has been encouraged to believe that biological sex is irrelevant and that what really matters is their gender “identity”.
The harms are manifold. Yet because so much of the progressive left has invested in this ideology, the truth is emerging painfully slowly. Those who raise safeguarding concerns are too often dismissed or vilified rather than heard.
Just as with the Post Office scandal, I believe the full horror will explode into the public consciousness in the years ahead. But this time, the responsibility will be far more widely spread.
If you care about children, particularly the most vulnerable, you should care about this.
This isn’t simply about men using women’s toilets, although the subjugation of biological women’s rights and safeguards to the demands of trans-identifying men is appalling in itself.
It’s about vulnerable children, the adults who are supposed to protect them, and the irreversible consequences of putting ideology ahead of safeguarding.
The harm being inflicted on children in the name of trans ideology is unforgivable.
Read this account by @hannahsbee of Sarah Redvers whistleblowing about the Brighton WellBN clinic.
Gender ideology breaks safeguarding.
thetimes.com/article/cfde7b4…
Colorado Principled Physicians retweeted
A Duke University camp socially transitioned a minor during a three week stay and offered to hide it from her parents:
Colorado Principled Physicians retweeted
The position of the Sex Discrimination Commissioner should not come as a surprise and in fact is the only position that she can take in order to try be consistent and coherent to herself and others given her overarching views and opinions.
We must understand that the position she expressed is the only position one can organically arrive at, if one - as she does- a) conflates sex and gender identity b) disregards the material reality of women in favor of women being a feeling or an identity. c) disregards that certain reproductive processes are tied to being of a certain sex.
I have genuinely tried to understand this position and to debate it with her to no avail. There is one point where we fundamentally differ and that I think underpins her positions on this: Commissioner Cody believes that if we were to recognize that women and girls have historically been discriminated against based on their sex (intersecting with other grounds), that would mean that we accept that that this discrimination is biologically determined and that this discrimination is acceptable or justified.
This reasoning is flawed. We would not follow the same logic with any other form of discrimination, say for example racial discrimination. Naming that black people are often and have been often discriminated against because they are black does not suggest that such discrimination is justified, nor a tacit acceptance of it, nor does it suggest that they should be forever locked in a condition of being racially discriminated against.
The answer to a serious problem cannot be to stop naming the cause, in the hope that this cause would magically go away or that its impact on the lives of people would soften or vanish.
Sex Discrimination Commissioner Anna Cody at Senate estimates said that protections designed to protect breastfeeding women from being discriminated against would also extend to “induced lactation in a biological male”. Read the full story: bit.ly/4zb29gC
Colorado Principled Physicians retweeted
Michael Knowles Is Stunned by a Trans Widow’s Story About Her Divorce and Custody Battle
Michael Knowles: What’s so hard for me to understand is the idea of choosing a fetish over your family.
You have a choice: live up to your marriage vows, be a husband to your wife and a father to your children, or indulge a fantasy by putting on a dress.
To think that someone would choose that over their wife, children, and family obligations, and then be celebrated for it, is difficult to understand.
Tracy Shannon: In our case, it destroyed the family and wrecked the marriage. We had to leave our family home. I’d been a stay-at-home mom for 10 years, had no job, and had homeschooled my children.
We ended up homeless, and I had to live with my parents for a couple of years while I got back on my feet financially. The court initially ordered him to pay just $500 a month in child support for three children.
It’s insulting to the family that society thinks this is okay because children are supposedly resilient.
Michael Knowles: If I never heard that phrase again, it would be too soon. It’s used to justify child abuse. People say, “Don’t worry, kids are resilient,” even when their parents are fighting and their education is being neglected.
Tracy Shannon: They’re not that resilient. My children have faced really difficult consequences. They might look like they’re doing fine, but it’s been a long journey.
Michael Knowles: How old are they now?
Tracy Shannon: They’re all over 18. My youngest with him is 19, and I also have a 20-year-old and a 24-year-old.
Between the three of them, there have been six suicide attempts of varying seriousness, and one child was hospitalized for an extended period.
People who disagree with me would say this happened because I didn’t accept their ideology. In fact, his lawyers wanted me to take the children for what they called re-education when we were divorcing.
Michael Knowles: Who wanted that?
Tracy Shannon: His lawyers. I was also sued for full custody after the divorce because I objected to him having his partner spend the night with my children. We had a morality clause in Texas that addressed this.
Michael Knowles: Hold on. This happened in Texas? The state supposedly considered the most conservative in the country?
Why you lying, Betsey? There is no genital exam. It's called a cheek swab. It's less invasive than a COVID test. Calm down. It doesn't "hurt" girls to keep boys out of girls sports, despite these creepy scenarios fear-mongering.
unavailable
Colorado Principled Physicians retweeted
The "genital exam" is one of the most ridiculous lies being circulated against the ballot initiatives in Washington and Colorado to make sure that girls don't have to play sports against boys. Both ballot initiatives require medical verification of sex prior to enrollment on a school sports team.
The ballot language in Washington specifies three methods of verification: "The student's reproductive anatomy, genetic makeup, or normal endogenously produced testosterone levels."
"Reproductive anatomy" is satisfied simply by a doctor's note.
"Genetic makeup" can be satisfied with a cheap, easy, painless, cheek swab (see below).
Testosterone levels would be a blood test.
The vast majority of students will simply get a doctor's note - which will add no cost or time to their annual doctor's visit which is already required as a condition to play scholastic sports.
The only reason medical verification is needed at all is that these states have allowed falsification of birth certificates, driver's licenses and other ID so that the drafters of the ballot language could not simply rely on them.
ufhealth.org/conditions-and-…
Colorado Principled Physicians retweeted
When 4.4 million dollars opposes popular Girls’ Sports and Protecting Minors from “Gender” Surgery—overshadowing spending in favor by 20x, where’s all that money coming from?
Oh look, it’s the usual suspect. ACLU and the billionaires who took over Colorado.
Claims of “grassroots” revealed to be more of the same supranational NGO network described by @DataRepublican
Colorado’s citizen-led ballot measures to protect girls sports and protect kids from s*x-change surgeries are being fought by an amorphous infrastructure of multimillionaire-funded foundations such as Open Societies, the Tides network, and Colorado’s Gill Foundation. These foundations filter money through organizations such as Planned Parenthood, the ACLU, and One Colorado to create a mirage of “grassroots” opposition to ballot measures supported by a broad spectrum of Colorado voters.
The @TheRMVoice report below.
Colorado has two propositions this year that were grassroots efforts - put on the ballot by volunteers collecting thousands of signatures. An effort that went completely ignored by mainstream media except to vaguely oppose without bringing much attention to what the ballots actually propose. They are very simple propositions - Prop 134 would keep girls sports for girls again and Prop 135 would prevent irreversible sexually mutilative "transgender surgeries" on minors. Anyone would common sense would agree these are basic child protective measures. However, in Colorado, we have a lot of trans industry opposition to this by many groups that have sprung up or been diverted to the cause of gender ideology. They fund dedicated campaigns against protecting girls sports and to promote sexually mutilative surgeries. Polls have shown the average Coloradan believes in protecting girls sports and children's bodies, so where is this coming from? @TheRMVoice looks at the money trail, and the funders behind the funders.
rockymountainvoice.com/2026/…
Colorado Principled Physicians retweeted
Today is apparently "Intersex Awareness Day," and a writer at the Trevor Project chose to honor people with developmental conditions by...lying about the nature and prevalence of their conditions for political gain.
The article just regurgitates the same tired arguments that have been thoroughly debunked many times, such as that "sex" refers to a collection of traits, that so-called "intersex" conditions are "as common as red hair" (1-2%), and that people with these conditions are not classifiable as male or female.
Lying to people about the nature and prevalence of their developmental condition does not help or support them. It exploits them.
I'm not going to write a formal response, because I've already debunked these arguments countless times. So I'll just leave you with a link to my most recent scholarly article on the topic: "Why There Are Exactly Two Sexes."
🔗link.springer.com/article/10…
Letting boys into girls sports and therefore their locker rooms, restrooms and chances of winning at their own sports violates girls privacy, safety and fairness. Vote YES! to Prop 134 to keep girls sports for girls, #Colorado. It's a no-brainer! #savegirlssports #savewomenssports
WATCH: A biological male absolutely dominates the offensive glass in this girls' high school basketball game.
Henry Hanlon scored 29 points and led his team to a 59-33 victory. He has a bright future in the WNBA.
These girls trained their whole life just to be posterized by a gender-confused man while leftists cheer. Videos like this show the tangible consequences of the Democrats' radical LGBTQ agenda.