Geopolitics, power, and the messy reality of it all. Independent analysis with occasional raw and emotional takes. 🧭
Joined April 2023
- Tweets124K
- Following807
- Followers15.8K
- Likes148K
Here is the detail that makes no sense.
The report claims Kushner had an account at the Bank of Israel. The Bank of Israel is the central bank, not a commercial bank. Private individuals cannot just open accounts there.
If he truly had an account at the central bank, that means the state itself was holding his money.
DUTCH SPIES HACKED JARED KUSHNER’S PHONE. WHAT THEY SAW WAS BILLIONS MOVING.
According to a new Vanity Fair report detailed by CBS:
Dutch intelligence started spying on Kushner because the Russians had already hacked him. When they got inside, they watched him log into a UAE account that had received hundreds of millions from a bank in Azerbaijan.
The report alleges the leaders of Saudi Arabia and the UAE funneled at least $2 billion into accounts linked to Kushner, including one at Israel’s central bank. Another $1 billion was reportedly meant for Kushner’s "personal benefit."
The money was disguised as government funding or charities.
He had no official government title. No Senate confirmation. No disclosure rules. 🧭
"Vote for me or you die" is the oldest trick in the book.
But it doesn't work when your own generals are demanding evidence, your rivals are filing treason charges, and your biggest ally is writing letters threatening the voters.
The fear campaign just ran out of fuel.
Liberman's exact words in the letter:
"The attempt to drag the State of Israel into war on the eve of elections, together with the willingness to sacrifice IDF soldiers solely due to fear of losing the elections, constitutes treason against the state, its security, and the IDF soldiers."
You don't hear the word "treason" thrown at a sitting Prime Minister very often.
AVIGDOR LIBERMAN JUST ACCUSED NETANYAHU OF TREASON.
The former Defense Minister and current MK formally asked the Attorney General to open a criminal investigation.
His allegation: Netanyahu is pressuring security chiefs to create a miscalculation with Iran to drag Israel into a war on the eve of elections, and is willing to sacrifice IDF soldiers to save his own political career.
This drops right after reports that IDF Chief of Staff Zamir refused Netanyahu's demand for a strike, demanding evidence and justification first.
The man who built his career on the "Iranian threat" is now being accused by his own defense establishment of using that threat as a domestic political lifeline. 🧭
פניתי הבוקר ליועצת המשפטית לממשלה בדרישה לפתוח בחקירה פלילית נגד בנימין נתניהו באשמת בגידה.
בחודש האחרון ראש ממשלת ישראל, בנימין נתניהו, לוחץ על ראשי מערכת הביטחון לנקוט צעדים שעלולים לייצר מיסקלקולציה מול איראן.
הניסיון לגרור את מדינת ישראל ערב הבחירות למלחמה, יחד עם הנכונות להקריב את חיילי צה״ל רק בשל חשש מהפסד בבחירות, הם בגידה במדינה, בביטחונה ובחיילי צה״ל.
"God commanded us" is the ultimate conversation ender.
You can negotiate borders, security arrangements, and land swaps. You cannot negotiate with a divine mandate. Once you frame the land as a heavenly gift and the people living on it as obstacles to be removed, diplomacy is dead before it even starts.
That's the trap. The "left" opposition isn't offering an end to the occupation, they're offering a different manager for it.
Eisenkot, the leading challenger, literally authored the Dahiya Doctrine of disproportionate force. The young woman citing God, the settler, the general, and the Prime Minister all agree on the destination. They just argue about the speed limit.
A seamless transition from the US anthem to the Israeli anthem, sung proudly by a US federal judge. If this exact same scene happened with any other country's flag and anthem, the entire right-wing media machine would call it treason.
He wants to start a regional war before the elections, and his own top general is refusing because there’s no justification.
The man who claims Iran is an "existential threat" literally has to beg his military to give him an excuse to bomb them for a campaign ad.
She isn't speaking in a vacuum. She's echoing the official platform of her government.
Look at the Likud party's original 1977 platform: "between the Sea and the Jordan there will only be Israeli sovereignty."
Look at current ministers like Smotrich and Ben-Gvir, who openly push for the annexation of the West Bank, the "voluntary emigration" of Gaza, and expansion into southern Lebanon and Syria.
When the people in power normalize the ideology of "Greater Israel," the younger generation just drops the diplomatic filter.
"WHERE DO PALESTINIANS GO?"
"I DON'T REALLY CARE... OR WE KILL THEM."
An Israeli citizen, interviewed on camera.
When asked where Palestinians should go, he suggests Arab countries, but notes that Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria belong to Israel too. If they don't leave, the alternative is murder.
His justification for taking the land in the first place? "God commanded us."
There is no diplomatic filter here. This is the raw ideology stated out loud, on a street, by an ordinary citizen. 🧭
Netanyahu Said the Real Threat Was Online. The Streets of Tel Aviv Just Proved Him Wrong.
"EVERYTHING IS DONE WITH BOTS."
Netanyahu's explanation for the global backlash against Israel.
Asked directly if the documented settler violence is also a lie, his answer: "Yes, yes, everything is done with bots... trying to poison young minds."
He calls it the "eighth front" and says he needs to deploy AI to fight it.
But a French mayor beaten into the dirt isn't a bot.
A Washington Post photographer kicked 50 times isn't an algorithm.
Burned Palestinian olive groves aren't an information war.
He's trying to automate a defense for the reality on the ground. 🧭
You just admitted that Israel's national security now hinges on a "two-year window" of a US president's term.
If surviving as a state requires "intimate conversations" with the White House, you aren't an independent sovereign nation. You're a protectorate.
Context from the reporting (Reuters/AP, Oct 23):
A shooting near Hebron killed two Israeli soldiers and two Palestinian gunmen.
Within hours, Netanyahu announced the forced evacuation of Palestinian neighborhoods, house-to-house raids, and demolitions, extending the closure to Hebron and Halhul.
Using a single attack to justify the mass displacement of a city is collective punishment. It's a war crime under the Geneva Conventions.
NETANYAHU JUST ANNOUNCED HE'S BRINGING THE "REFUGEE CAMP MODEL" TO THE WEST BANK.
"We will evacuate the residents."
That is a direct quote from the Israeli Prime Minister.
His justification? A shooting that left four people dead. His plan? Apply the "successful, aggressive model" from the refugee camps. Evacuate Palestinian neighborhoods, go house-to-house, destroy infrastructure, and impose a closure on entire cities.
Thousands of uninvolved civilians are about to be forcibly displaced. He announced the blueprint for collective punishment on live television. 🧭
"DEMOCRAT OR REPUBLICAN. IT'S NOT AN ISSUE."
In 1973, Richard Nixon told congressional leaders the quiet part out loud: "No American President will let Israel go down that tube."
Fifty years later, the names change, the wars change, and the Oval Office changes hands. But the blank check never bounces.
Here is how they pulled it off in 3 steps. They did it all on camera.
STEP 1: PROMISE SOMEONE ELSE'S LAND.
1917. Britain never owned Palestine. But Balfour gave it away anyway. At the time, Jews were 3% of the population. 13,942 vs 386,320 Muslims. In their own home, they were referred to as the "non-Jewish communities."
STEP 2: SEND THE SALESMAN.
1978. Enter 28-year-old Netanyahu on American TV. Articulate. MIT graduate. Selling the exact same script you hear today: "The core is Arab refusal, not occupation."
Then Nixon admits the economic reality in 1992: "Israel is not a strategic interest of the US." It's a moral commitment. Translation: American taxpayers fund it.
STEP 3: TAKE 78% BY FORCE.
1947. The UN proposes giving 56% of the land to people who own 7% and are 33% of the population. Palestinians say no. Who would say yes?
1948. Deir Yassin. Tantura. Lydda. Over 500 villages wiped off the map. The official British report on Deir Yassin: "Women and children were stripped, lined up, photographed, and slaughtered."
750,000 expelled. Never allowed back. Their houses taken. The orders are in the documents: "expelled outside the borders of the state."
They call it independence. Palestinians call it what it is: AL-NAKBA. The Catastrophe.
And they tell you this started on October 7th?
This documentary shows every receipt from 1878 to 1949. Watch it before they claim this one is "complicated" too. 🧭
DECEMBER 4, 1947: THEY CELEBRATED. THE NAKBA WAS ALREADY STARTING.
Jewish residents celebrate the UN partition vote.
What the newsreels leave out: The proposed state included 500,000 Palestinians who never consented to it. The vote was just a recommendation. By the time Israel declared independence in May 1948, the catastrophe was already underway. 🧭
A VOTE GAVE 56% OF THE LAND TO 32% OF THE PEOPLE
November 29, 1947, the UN partitioned Palestine, the Arab majority got 43%.
The Arabs rejected it. Fighting broke out. In April 1948, the Deir Yassin massacre sent refugees fleeing. On May 14, the Jewish state declared itself. By December, half of Palestine's population was gone.
The population was mostly unarmed, facing a well-organized, well-armed force. The narrator's words: "The principal and main impulse of people was to run, to get as far away from the fighting, from the terror, as possible."
The same UN that voted to partition resolved that refugees wishing to return home should be permitted to, "at the earliest practicable date."
That resolution has been reaffirmed every year since. It has never been implemented. 🧭
The whole list rests on institutionalizing the IHRA definition, which explicitly conflates legitimate criticism of Israel with antisemitism.
Then Rule 8 weaponizes the counter-terrorism framework (Prevent) by linking that definition to "radicalisation risk."
This builds a security pipeline where pro-Palestinian advocacy gets routed through counter-terrorism protocols.
Context and sources for the 2002 siege:
• April 2, 2002: Israeli forces entered Bethlehem under Ariel Sharon.
• The siege of the Church of the Nativity lasted 39 days.
• 8 killed inside the church, including Samir Ibrahim Salman (a Christian church worker).
• 46 killed in the Bethlehem district in 2002.
Sources: UN Report of the Secretary General on Jenin and other Palestinian Cities (2002), Palestinian Centre for Human Rights Annual Report (2002); The Washington Post (April/May 2002).
"THEY KNEW HE WAS THE DIRECTOR OF A HOSPITAL... BUT HE WAS SHOT BY A HIGH VELOCITY BULLET."
April 2002. Israeli forces enter Bethlehem. A local resident describes the military occupation of his city.
During the assault, Palestinian fighters and civilians took refuge in the Church of the Nativity. The siege lasted 39 days.
Eight Palestinians were killed inside the church, including a Christian church worker shot by Israeli soldiers. By the end of the year, 46 Palestinians were killed in the Bethlehem district.
A city sacred to Christians around the world, turned into a military zone. 🧭
Wolff points out the media's denial.
"The Russians did nothing about NATO moving close to their border in all those countries. And yet you portray them as putting all of Europe at risk... They're the ones who have been suffering your invasion since 1990."
When you push a military alliance right up to a country's border, break your promises, and then act shocked when they finally push back, that's not diplomacy. Only gaslighting.