Mike (@CryptyMike) header
Mike (@CryptyMike) profile picture

Blockchain Warrior, Crypto Samurai, Illiquid token buyer, Musician | prev. @krakenfx @BRDHQ (acq. Coinbase)

Climbing the Blockchain
Joined August 2014
Photo by Mike (@CryptyMike)Photo by Mike (@CryptyMike)Photo by Mike (@CryptyMike)Photo by Mike (@CryptyMike)Photo by Mike (@CryptyMike)Photo by Mike (@CryptyMike)Photo by Mike (@CryptyMike)Photo by Mike (@CryptyMike)Photo by Mike (@CryptyMike)Photo by Mike (@CryptyMike)
Mike retweeted
Moonvember is here
200
72
22
1,089
55,136
The most interesting part of $ORE's design isn't live yet. TLDR: Today, revenue generated by the ORE Reserve auto-compounds in isolation. Eventually, that revenue could be streamed to uORE holders (miners holding unclaimed rewards) as SOL mining credits, allowing the protocol to increasingly fund its own mining activity. The result is a flywheel that could strengthen mining incentives, lift staking yield, and put ORE on a path to net deflation. First, it's worth understanding why ORE is different. Bitcoin, Zcash, Ethereum, and Solana all use their native assets to incentivize network security. ORE doesn't have that requirement. It inherits Solana’s security, so it can direct its incentives toward a different objective: rewarding those who accumulate and hold the asset. ORE is a store of value by design, and nearly every mechanism in the protocol reinforces this objective. Consider how value flows through ORE today: - Miners deploy SOL to earn ORE, aiming to acquire it below market price. - A 10% refining fee on claimed rewards is redistributed to holders of unclaimed rewards (uORE). - Mining revenue funds ORE buybacks, burial, staking rewards, and the Reserve. - The Reserve provides liquidity while generating its own revenue through LP fees and yield-bearing assets like JitoSOL and USDv. The result is a system where mining activity supports holders through multiple mechanisms, while the Reserve continues to grow and generate additional liquidity and revenue. But there's one more piece to the design. Arguably the most interesting. In AI, recursive self-improvement (RSI) describes a system capable of improving its own capabilities, with each improvement enabling further improvements. ORE has a potential economic equivalent. Today, the simplified flow looks like this: Mining → Reserve → LP fees + yield → Reserve. The Reserve grows, generates revenue through LP fees and yield, and reinvests that revenue into itself. A straightforward compounding mechanism. But the loop back to mining remains open. Now consider what happens when Reserve revenue is redirected to uORE holders as SOL credits, usable exclusively for mining ORE. The flow becomes: Mining → Reserve → LP fees + yield → SOL mining credits → Mining → Reserve. The loop closes. This is the recursive moment. Consider the significance of this change. Today, mining depends on SOL supplied by users. With mining credits, the Reserve’s own revenue becomes a new source of capital to fund that same activity. Originally powered by user capital, ORE could become increasingly self-powered. A protocol generating its own fuel. There are two particularly interesting second-order effects here. First, Reserve-funded mining credits could increase competition for ORE rewards, driving up production costs. To the extent this stimulates incremental mining activity, it generates additional protocol revenue, supporting buybacks, burial, staking rewards, and Reserve growth. Second, and perhaps most importantly, this creates a potential path toward sustained net deflation. At sufficient scale, additional protocol revenue could fund enough buybacks and burial to consistently exceed new ORE issuance. To be clear, mining credits aren't live today, and it may be years before the economics justify turning them on. The Reserve first needs sufficient scale and sustainable revenue to fund meaningful mining incentives without compromising its liquidity or long-term growth. More importantly, the incremental mining activity needs to generate enough additional value to justify redirecting revenue away from direct compounding. But the potential end state is worth considering: an economic system that compounds recursively, under its own power.
33
55
24
207
11,710
Mike retweeted
$ORE outperforming everything SoV^2
6
12
2
91
2,504
The best AI to date was SmarterChild on AIM in 2003
2
72
Mike retweeted
Last time the market didn't properly sell off after a huge event like this was the FTX collapse When I saw the lack of follow through then I got giga bullish And we subsequently went from 16k to 100k Hard to be bearish here after having been given the same setup yet again
461
711
140
9,087
750,799
$ZECBTC dgaf about any of the worry out there
59
49
7
652
52,812
Mike retweeted
ore has the potential to become a multi trillion $ asset
4
10
2
84
2,120
Mike retweeted
ORE is up 50% in October and BTC down 10% Most people still don't know what it is or how to mine, it takes 1 minute: 1. Pick tiles - don't try to guess by picking 1-2 tiles, the more you pick the less risk you take 2. Choose how much SOL to put in 3. Hit deploy Every round has a bonus pool called the motherlode currently worth 101.8 ORE ($14.6K). in addition to mining ORE on the grid, every round you mine is a chance to open the motherlode.
9
25
4
137
9,040
I've decided that this is all incredibly bullish for Zcash
15
14
2
185
5,568
Mike retweeted
Zcash wants $3,000 faster than you can imagine. $ZEC
16
12
1
203
7,007
All your KOLs were bearish? 😂 they lost their swag
1
88
.@ORE removes the middleman. No electricity company to pay. No hardware to buy. Mine from anywhere. The people’s SoV. Only possible on @solana.
Can ORE be a store of value without proof of work or its own consensus? Here's how it works and the cases for and against.
3
5
40
442
Bankless writing and posting about $ORE from Main
Can ORE be a store of value without proof of work or its own consensus? Here's how it works and the cases for and against.
7
19
2
91
2,597
Robust article - I’d add that with the parimutuel removal and ML odds being reduced ORE functions a lot more like mining with variable production cost as opposed to the lottery analogies. Completely agree about the accessibility piece: it is crucial for a SoV to be easy to use.
Can ORE be a store of value without proof of work or its own consensus? Here's how it works and the cases for and against.
1
8
45
863
Can ORE be a store of value without proof of work or its own consensus? Here's how it works and the cases for and against.
22
40
11
152
16,741
Mike retweeted
You guy's know we're going up from here, right?
23
5
1
123
7,012
Mike retweeted
Say no to wrapped SoVs.
🎥 Bitcoin was built so you could own money with no middleman. @ORE is building a Solana's own version of this 👇
6
10
1
88
3,548
🎉 tiered of holding on to my last few satoshi on Bitcoin network. Swapping them to @solana to get some more @ORE AIGMA?
15
7
3
73
2,836
Slowly, then all at once.
I like @ORE man, it's cool. Piece on it later today. While it doesn't have PoW or even own its own consensus, arguments resonate about it being a response to inaccessibility of mining (home miners are not realistic, sad) AND being a cultural foil to Solana (SoV in a land of quick flips).
1
3
47
708
I like @ORE man, it's cool. Piece on it later today. While it doesn't have PoW or even own its own consensus, arguments resonate about it being a response to inaccessibility of mining (home miners are not realistic, sad) AND being a cultural foil to Solana (SoV in a land of quick flips).
17
20
6
137
6,535