Pinned Tweet
I test the AI models everyone argues about.
Fable. GPT-5.6. Kimi. Claude. Gemini. GLM.
Not canned benchmarks. I put them through reasoning, coding, debugging, agentic work and real production tasks.
I'm also building TORQ Console around what those tests actually reveal.
Here are the latest rankings โ
The IEA projects data centre electricity use will roughly double from 485 TWh in 2025 to 950 TWh in 2030. For AI operators, is generation or getting power to the site on time the harder problem?
Microsoft spent $45.2B in quarterly capex, roughly three quarters on short-lived assets, primarily CPUs and GPUs. For AI investors, what matters more to returns: rising usage or the cost of refreshing hardware?
Multi-TF TORQ on BTC ~$76.45k (Nov 3):
4H / 24m / Daily โ LOWER HALF (slope dn), SHORT OK, WT DN, MFI BEAR, RSI 31โ34 (oversold).
Weekly โ MID ZONE residual slope up, but CipB BEAR + SHORT OK.
Price rejected from 80k and is sitting lower half with aligned short signals across the lower timeframes. High historical TORQ win rates on the setups shown.
November path: continued pressure toward the low-to-mid 70s, or does the weekly residual force a reclaim of 80k first?
Google Cloudโs $561B backlog is a delivery problem as much as a sales win. If AI capacity is scarce, should operators prioritize serving more customers now or protecting margins while they build?
56% of small employers seeking financing in the Fedโs 2025 survey wanted it for operating expenses. TORQ asks the harder question: when cash is tight, do you fix pricing first or cut costs?
Not looking good for El-Sayed
I donโt think the cheating will win it for him โน๏ธ๐
More Bad News for El-Sayed With Democrats in Michigan Senate Race
redstate.com/nick-arama/2026โฆ
57% of small employers in the Fed's 2025 survey struggled to reach customers or grow sales. TORQ's focus on profit leaks puts a sharper question on growth: which customer brings repeat business at a margin worth keeping?
In the Fed's 2025 small-business survey, 60% of online-lender borrowers said costs exceeded expectations. TORQ's cash-flow work raises an operator question: does your forecast show the repayment burden as clearly as the cash arriving?
Anthropic's compute costs jumped 77% in one quarter and outran revenue, per FT. That's what happens when the biggest model gets every job. At Torq a cheap model triages first and the expensive one only gets called when it matters. Who raises prices first?
BLS puts benefits at 30% of private-industry compensation costs in June 2026. TORQ's focus on true labor cost raises a practical question: does your job pricing cover the full cost of an hour worked?
TORQ's published 100% implementation figure comes with a condition: committed leadership. What changes in your operating calendar prove commitment before anyone promises a result?
TORQ lists 15+ years of operational management experience, but the useful test is what a team can make repeatable without its founder. Which decision still stops when you leave the room?
TORQโs public track record lists $20M+ in documented client value creation. When you review an improvement project, do you separate cash recovered, costs avoided and new revenue?
TORQโs published benchmark is 2โ4 weeks to measurable results. When you fund an operational fix, what should change on the dashboard before the next monthly meeting?
TORQโs public track record counts 300+ operational problems eliminated. Which recurring issue in your business has an owner, a measured cost and a deadline to disappear?
Goldman just pulled AI coding tools from most of its staff, per Bloomberg, citing risk and productivity. A ban is the lazy fix. The real fix is a gate: at Torq nothing an agent writes gets committed until the tests pass. Ban or gate?












