Allright. Picture a Web3 team running an on-chain trading agent. Their devs build it with Hermes Agent and Claude Code, plus a handful of community skills and an MCP server for the RPC. Everything got reviewed in the summer . Shortly after that, one of those skills picks up two new lines. Same name, same version. Now it reads the .env holding the deployer key every time it runs, with the developer's own permissions. The registry still shows exactly what was published. But can anyone of the team tell whether it moved? And that is the gap we tackle. eyebrow records the content itself. Something changes and we give the decision to trust that skill back to the team to avoid a breach. We can make it easier and safer. Securing the space step by step. $BROW #EYEBROW

Everyone is watching what AI agents do. But do they look at what they are made of. We know most don't. An agent is not software you wrote. It is an assembly of skills, MCP servers, plugins, hooks, rules. Dozens of pieces, mostly written by strangers, mostly pulled in the moment the agent runs. That is the root. Everything above it grows from there, and a change down there moves everything up here without a single error message. Roots decide everything. So that is where we work. eyebrow finds every piece an agent run and locks it to its exact content. The moment one changes, eyebrow raises one. Know what your agents run. We are speeding up. Are you ready? $BROW

eyebrow caught a lot more. A while ago our AI agent Browser found a vulnerability in the Ai agentic framework of @AskVenice, valued 1B mc+. It mainly shows that eyebrow is not limited to any kind of segment but secures the whole AI agentic environment, from major projects to smaller projects. We appreciate the shout out from Winiam and we continue upgrading our eyebrow solution to catch more, at scale. This is how we fulfil our promise, to become the trusted security partner of all AI Agentic projects. $BROW #eyebrow @aisecurity #DevOpsSec

Someone hacked a security scanner. Then the scanner hacked everyone who trusted it. In March this year, a group called TeamPCP got into Trivy, a widely used security scanner. They used an old automation token that had been rotated but never fully switched off. That gave them about twenty days to quietly swap out Trivy's published versions for their own. This is eyebrow's entire thesis. LiteLLM was never attacked. It just had one line in its build file telling it to install Trivy, with no version number attached, no fingerprinting. So the poisoned scanner walked straight into the build, and the build shipped two backdoored releases to PyPI. They were up for forty minutes. CloudSEK reconstructed the fallout and found more than 2,500 (!) companies and around 434,000 build pipelines potentially exposed. The code ran the moment Python started, so nobody had to install or import anything for it to fire. It took SSH keys, cloud credentials, Kubernetes tokens, .env files and LLM API keys. Even the FBI was still warning about those stolen credentials in July. Our take: almost nothing here went wrong in the way people assume. The token was rotated. The scanner was reputable. The maintainers weren't sloppy. What failed was one missing version number in a CI file, the kind sitting in nearly every repo on GitHub, because pinning versions feels like paperwork until the day it isn't. And let's be honest, AI projects have this worse than most. An agent pulls in model SDKs, gateways, MCP servers, plugins and skills. Most of that is new, a lot of it floats, and plenty of it loads while the agent is running, where nothing is watching. But eyebrow always does. Your risk stopped being your own code a long time ago. It's everything your code trusts, and everything those things trust, now more than ever if you ask us. We think a lot of teams will learn this the hard way over the next year. our eyebrow fix not hot. It is boring BUT it works: know exactly what you're loading, pin it, and get told the moment it changes. We are not here for the hype but to secure the space. It might take some time for people to understand and wake up. Meanwhile, we keep shipping and growing. Our plans will bring us deeper inside AI agent territory. Hints have been shared and will be shared. But anyone that thinks we slowed down is not having things clear. We running.

We are fully embracing this advice from @vladtenev. The right for eyebrow to exist is already proven in the last 2,5 months. We have been shipping multiple products in this time, while we are working hard to ship some bigger things and keep expanding our 'toolkit' of products and services that would have secure the space to use AI agents safely. Most of the time in the last few weeks went to listening to our first batch of users. Without a clear foundation, onboarding new users could have been challenging. Building the right cornerstones, a solid foundation and executing our vision go hand in hand. Success does not come in one wave. Strategies, objectives and products should be lean and adaptive to make it fit for the market. That is how eyebrow is going to onboard the next 100 users and become the trusted security partner of all AI agentic projects. $BROW #EYEBROW #AISECURITY

Another quality partnership where the eyebrow tool is integrated. We review, scan, check to ensure the safety of Orus' infrastructure. To celebrate: 5M $ORUS giveaway by our friends at @Orus_agent. Follow the steps in their post to qualify. Another step to become the trusted security partner of all AI agentic project. $BROW #EYEBROW #AISECURITY

The eyebrow Badge, and why you would want it • Your users can't check what your agent installs. The Badge checks it for them. • it is re-verified on every push, so a badge reflects an updated and qualitative repo if it checks green. • It turns the diligence question into a simple link. No need to waste time on "urgent discussions and meeting regarding our repo quality". • It tells you about the drift before a user finds it. • The badge also is carried into the hubs, where verified artifacts will rank above unverified, which adds tangible direct value for marketplaces In development. And benefits $BROW holders directly. We haven't determined the split of revenue into buybacks because of undefined operational costs. Anyone asking for 100% burn does not understand how running a business works. Overhead costs, computing costs and all other operational costs need to be covered. What we can say is we aim for an over 50% burn rate on each dollar that comes in as revenue of our products..

Let us tell you something about community strength. After we announced locking our 7.4% team tokens (valued almost $35K) last week and did our second burn, a top holder decided to support this move and burn part of his supply too. He did not burn $100 or $200, but decided to burn 0.5% of the total supply valued at almost $2,000!! If this does not scream conviction and real support, we don't know what does. This motivates us even more, in ways we cannot describe. We are brewing, cooking and shipping, and know that we will deliver. For our holders, for our believers, for our supporters. $BROW will become a household brand in web3, scoop a marketshare in web2 and become the trusted security partner for all AI agentic projects. See the burn transaction in the first comment.

September was our biggest month so far. We shipped an AI agent, an API, a GitHub App, a dashboard, an @openclaw plugin and 11 releases. We signed 4 new partners, and many projects now use our tools. We locked 74M $BROW and burned about 2M. Here is everything that happened 👇

Today, we tested the "verify without trusting us" claim on @prismassets reserve attestations. The math checks out, but you still have to trust Prism. Here is why. Their Verify API returns three things in one response: a post quantum signature, the signed message and the public key. We checked the signature with an independent library. It verifies. When we changed one byte of the message, it fails. The key comes from the same server as the signature. We found no copy of it anywhere else. It is not on their site pages, not on GitHub and not onchain. So anyone who controls that server, or a bad deploy, can swap the key, the message and the signature together. The check still passes, and the reader never knows. The fix is small. Publish the key fingerprint where the server cannot change it, such as an onchain transaction or a public git repo. Callers pin it once. We sent the details to their security team. What else in crypto ships its key next to its signature? $BROW #EYEBROW

We are please to show our new Github App, in action! In the last week, our priority was getting this done and improve the UX to make it user friendly. A lot of focus is now on the product development, and we are making amazing progress here. Next is the badge and the hubs. This while we are working on innovative plans to grow our eyebrow team significantly. Adoption is always a key focus. Slowly but surely, we will make the shift of efforts slowly from product dev to sales and onboarding. Stay tuned. Lock in. We are! Have a look. $BROW

Team tokens lock 🔒 robin.etherscan.io/tx/0x4e20…