Kitty Has Klaws ™️ 🇺🇸🦮🐱🐾🌴🎼☮️ MAGA

The Susan Wiles revolving door of treachery. Susan Wiles worked for Ron DeSantis. Susan Wiles was fired by DeSantis for leaking information Susan Wiles found her way to the Trump world with the help of very important friends in high places. Those friends threw a wedge between two good friends turning them against one another that being Trump and DeSantis. Once that wedge was established this RINO gang went to work on a vulnerable Don Jr selling him on you got it, JD Vance The Trump-DeSantis ticket was destroyed before it ever got started. The scheme was to sell Vance to Don Jr who then sold it to Trump. Vance then took back the years of badmouthing Trump and said it was a mistake Trump bought it because Wiles sold Vance as an up and coming rock star that will only benefit your presidency The Trump-Vance ticket was official Wiles was sold on Trump Vance was sold on Trump. As for the elite RINOs? They got their in woman in Susan Wiles a proven leaker and master manipulator They got their Pence in Vance Vance played the game until the midterms where he ended that game and started his separation from Trump by blaming the Iran War on Trump. Note how he never once spoke negatively about the War and actually held peace talks with the Iranian’s Once Vance’s blame game wasn’t received well in fact it may be his ending, he did a 360 and is looking to save grace for his 2028 run. This was an orchestrated, well designed game of manipulation to catapult Vance for 28. Vance fucked it all up by opening his phony mouth. Now the best thing that can come out of this is Vance is done. Wiles got screamed at by Trump before she left. Don’t believe the bullshit about Wiles leaving graciously just to move on from her post and to work for Trump in another capacity. That’s the game of politics. Never make it look like your administration is in trouble. All for show and tell They were both caught. Their plan exposed and now we know why we never got any of the accountability this country is starving for. The manipulative Susan Wiles, the same Wiles who was working on bringing Pete Hegseth down. Trump went scorched earth when he found out Enter the closer. Trump’s number one confidant. Stephen Miller. It’s Miller Time! All of a sudden the Dems and the media are scared shitless! Now without someone who was supposed to be your top advisor, manipulating you and giving you false intel, maybe we can get back to the game plan starting with accountability. Now we all know what Hegseth meant when he said Patriots are now in control. These are going to be a helluva last two months and a historic next two years. Let the games begin! It’s Miller Time! My two cents

Patriots in control.

Once a motherfucker, always a motherfucker.

Just in case you missed it.

How to Woke Right: Step 1: Spend months attacking virtually every decision President Trump makes, from the war in Iran to his economic policies, telling Americans how badly they're being betrayed and how unaffordable everything has become, without bothering to analyze the data and without making any effort to explain what the administration is actually trying to accomplish or why those decisions were made in the first place. Step 2: When Republicans lose elections, blame Trump for supposedly ignoring what Americans want, as if your own constant outrage and attacks had absolutely nothing to do with shaping how those voters feel. Forget examining whether the policies were justified, whether they were properly explained, or what alternatives would actually benefit the country. Step 3: Lecture everyone else about the importance of keeping the Republican Party united. Tell us that criticizing Tucker Carlson is dangerous because he's part of the conservative movement and we cannot afford to divide the right. Tell us that criticizing Tucker for spreading insane conspiracy theories and promoting everything anti-America is supposedly a threat to conservative unity, while telling Republican voters that their own president has betrayed them for no apparent reason. Now, I want to be clear about something, because I think this is where the argument often gets lost. Nobody is obligated to blindly defend Trump or agree with every decision he makes. There are legitimate arguments to be had about the Iran war, its costs, and the administration's economic policies. But if you genuinely care about conservative principles and want Americans to understand what Republicans are trying to accomplish, why wouldn't you at least explain the reasoning behind those decisions? Do you seriously believe Trump went into office intending to make life more expensive for Americans? Do you think he decided to confront Iran for absolutely no reason? Even if you believe the war was a terrible mistake, is it really that difficult to explain why preventing the Iranian regime from acquiring nuclear weapons would be an important American national security objective, and then make your argument about why his approach was wrong? Many of these people enthusiastically supported Trump and helped convince Americans to vote for him. Now they spend their time telling those same voters that everything he does is a betrayal, while offering absolutely nothing in the way of serious policy alternatives. If you believe a policy is wrong, explain why, including what it was intended to accomplish and why your alternative would serve Americans better. But don't spend months encouraging voters to see every difficult decision as proof that their president has abandoned them, and then act surprised when those voters become disillusioned. Oh and I forgot step 4) Blame "neocons" or Jews for the loss instead of actually doing a moment of introspection or asking if your "republican" friends telling everyone not to vote may have had something to do with it.

Hi JD, since you're explaining why Republicans lost the midterms, there's something I'd really like you to explain. Just recently, you publicly defended your friendship with Tucker Carlson and confirmed that the two of you still speak. Then, days before the election, Tucker told 100 million people that Trump is considering a nuclear strike on Iran, supposedly based on inside sources in the administration. He even claims to know what you're personally advising the president. And you haven't said a word about it. Now, I'm not suggesting you're Tucker's source. But the fact that you've publicly acknowledged your friendship and ongoing communication with him puts a pretty enormous spotlight on you. Tucker Carlson is a habitual liar. He lies constantly, contradicts himself, and has spent the past few years telling Americans how wonderful Russia and Qatar are while painting the most miserable picture imaginable of America. His entire operation is dedicated to convincing Americans that their country is hopeless and their enemies are somehow more admirable. Now he's spreading panic about an impending nuclear war just days before an election, and people who ordinarily despise him are suddenly treating him as a credible journalist. (Even Christiane Amanpour amplified him!) And you're telling us that the war is why Republicans lost, without so much as acknowledging what your own friend was telling tens of millions of Americans right before they voted. If you know Tucker is lying, why haven't you publicly called him out? And why would you want to remain friends with someone who is knowingly spreading such an outrageous lie about the administration you serve in? And there's another thing about your post that doesn't make sense to me. If you still believe that preventing Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons is vital to American national security, then shouldn't you be apologizing to Americans for failing to make that case? I understand that Americans are frustrated with the war and the price they're paying at the pump. But if you genuinely believe we're dealing with a threat of this magnitude, surely your responsibility as vice president is to explain why confronting it is necessary, including why Americans might have to endure some economic pain in the process. Instead, you're now treating public frustration as though it settles the question of whether the war was justified in the first place. If you believe the threat can be dealt with later, explain how. If you believe diplomacy can still work (as Tucker claims), explain what happens when Iran refuses to abandon its nuclear ambitions. Are we supposed to accept a nuclear Iran because gas is expensive? What happens if Iran starts charging tolls in the Strait of Hormuz after America leaves? And if you never believed this war was necessary in the first place, then I think you owe Americans an explanation for a number of your own public statements defending the administration's position. I understand that a vice president has obligations to the president, but that doesn't explain away your own words or your role in shaping policy. You were personally involved in these negotiations. You had an enormous platform to explain the stakes to Americans. If you believe this was necessary for our national security and Americans rejected it because they didn't understand why, then that is also a failure of leadership, including yours. And I'm tired of watching anyone who questions you immediately accused of being an Israeli operative, Israel First, or secretly paid by Israel. If you think I'm wrong, address what I'm saying. I don't think anyone being intellectually honest can look at this situation and pretend there aren't some very serious questions about Vance's conduct here.

🚨 NOW: President Trump takes the stage in Clemson, South Carolina with a SUPER rowdy crowd in attendance Another sold out venue, of course. As always. "USA! USA! USA!" chants echoing throughout the arena 🔥