Male 💪, 6'1''🧍♂️, 6.5'' 😉, Not single 🚫.
your moms house
Joined January 2024
- Tweets10K
- Following7
- Followers130
- Likes5.8K
OK ladies: imagine you aren’t in a providing mood at all. Not even slightly. You’re busy with your work, your hobbies, or watching your favourite TV show. Zero desire to hand over cash. Your boyfriend sighs loudly and goes, “Can you give me some money now?” in a whiny voice and then grabs your wallet. He then sulks and starts whining when you aren’t instantly ready to provide, and starts saying you haven’t given him any money for three days.Annoying? Not very attractive?GOOD YOU UNDERSTAND WHY PASSIVE-AGGRESSIVE INSTA-PROVIDING BEHAVIOUR IS ANNOYING.
Ok lads: imagine you aren’t horny at all. Not even slightly. You’re busy fixing a shelf or ironing your suit or watching your favourite TV show. Zero sexy feelings. Your girlfriend sighs loudly and goes “can we have sex now” in whingy voice and then grabs your ass. She then sulks and starts whining when you aren’t instantly aroused and into it and starts saying you haven’t had sex for 3 days.
Annoying? Not very sexy?
GOOD YOU UNDERSTAND WHY PASSIVE AGGRESSIVE INSTA-HORNY BEHAVIOUR IS ANNOYING
Women find roughly 80% of men to be "below average" and unattractive.
Women will spend their youth getting run through by Chads who have options. Once those women turn 30+ they'll either be single mothers or have had several abortions. These women are now stuck on their highest setting (alpha widowed); psychologically incapable of pair bonding with a man, then settling with someone they aren't attracted to to extract resources from until they can find a better option (monkey branching).
I have met three women in my life that had genuinely interesting personalities. Almost every other man I know has a fascinating personality. It's an epidemic of women who cannot flirt or charm.
Casually admitting that you agree women prefer manipulative men over genuinely decent men.
This quoted post is unavailable.
Women resist calling relationships transactional because it would force them to acknowledge reciprocal obligation: that they, too, must offer something of value in return, rather than simply receiving behavior and provisions as a one-way entitlement.
When your IQ is just high enough to see that there is an issue, but not high enough to understand the simple reason as to why it is an issue.
Me getting serious about getting women to do their share of the below items:
Overall employed workers: Men ~53% (≈52.9% men / 47.1% women)
Natural resources, construction, and maintenance occupations: Men ~94%
Construction and extraction occupations: Men ~96%
Installation, maintenance, and repair occupations: Men ~96%
Production, transportation, and material moving occupations: Men ~75%
Construction industry: Men ~87–89%
Manufacturing industry: Men typically 70–80%
Many specific trades (carpenters, construction laborers, roofers, welders, machinists, heavy truck drivers, mining roles, etc.): Men 90–99%
Workplace fatalities: Men ~92%
Women still do 2.5 times more unpaid care work than men.
We're serious about changing that. Are you? 👀
#ShareTheCare
Remember, watch what they respond to, not what they say they like.
I don’t know if men will get this, but many women can find a man absolutely gorgeous yet feel ZERO attraction to him.
I think Henry Cavill is the perfect-looking man, but I’d never be with someone who looks like that, even if given the chance… even if he was tatted up 😩😭🫣
Some beauty you just admire, without feeling any desire.
"And men almost NEVER date someone less attractive than themselves" 🤣
She believes this because women rate 80% of men as below average which is not how averages work. Modern women are so retarded.
Something about female attraction that a lot of men don’t understand is that we don’t find it immutable
For women, his physical attractiveness ties directly to her impression of him
This is why women will often date & marry men similar in attractiveness if not a bit “lower”
And men almost NEVER date someone less attractive than themselves
Because for women, if there’s a baseline attraction AND he is funny, kind, admirable, and a little bit sexually aggressive, he will become physically hotter to her (this is why women tend to be pretty forgiving of the “dad bod”)
So likely what happened was he literally became unattractive to her in the pods because their exchange was so painfully awkward
When women describe “the ick” they are vocalizing that something in his behavior in that moment made him PHYSICALLY less attractive to her — and if the attraction is only base line, it is much harder for him to come back from
If he was suave in that exchange, she likely wouldn’t have reacted that way
(Plausibly why she agreed to give him another chance when he came across much more confident and “cool” in the reunion they had)
Women tend to prefer long-term partners (husbands/cucks) who command substantial resources and social capital yet remain relatively pliable, while favoring short-term sexual partners (Chads) who display the interpersonal dominance needed to shape the interaction itself.
Women, like all of us, are first and last creatures of the eye. The few men whose faces and frames kindle an immediate, involuntary spark are granted the only currency that matters: attention. Everyone else—the thoughtful, the sharp, the quietly extraordinary—never enters the frame at all. They are not rejected; they are unperceived. And what is never perceived cannot exist.
In that sense the tragedy is not cruelty, but prior selection. Most interesting men do not lose the competition. They are never allowed to compete.
When men are the main consumers of something (porn), it is labeled a male problem. When women are the main participants in something (hookup culture, in which many women sleep with a small subset of men), it is still labeled a male problem. The standard for assigning responsibility appears to shift depending on which gender is being discussed.