🇮🇱عميت Amit עמית 🇺🇦 retweeted
Two months ago, Javier Bardem told his followers to boycott Adidas because it partnered with a disabled Israeli man.
Now, he's starring in a film by an Israeli filmmaker.
According to Bardem, the Adidas campaign was unacceptable because it featured Shalev Biton, an Israeli who lost his leg when he was wounded on the Gaza border in 2021. He shared posts calling Biton a war criminal and a "genocidal demon."
Except Biton was injured while guarding inside Israel's borders, hardly a "war crime." He spent the years since becoming a powerful advocate for disability rights. The Adidas campaign advertised a service that lets amputees buy a single shoe. Adidas ended up apologizing for the ad.
This week, Lionsgate announced that Bardem will star in Wet, a new film written and directed by Alma Har'el, an Israeli filmmaker who was born and raised in Tel Aviv.
It might seem strange for Bardem to lead a global shaming campaign against an Israeli who advertised inclusion, and then happily accept a job opportunity from an Israeli making a star-studded film.
But it makes sense when you remember that all of his decisions are based on one thing. Opportunism.
🇮🇱عميت Amit עמית 🇺🇦 retweeted
Death by a thousand edits:
Another erasure of the Jewish historical connection to Israel on Wikipedia
On Wikipedia’s “Israel” article, there’s an 1870s photo by Félix Bonfils of Jews praying at the Western Wall.
Until November 4th,2026 the caption was:
"Jews in the Western Wall in Jerusalem 1870, a holy site in Judaism"
From November 4th 2026, 18:54 UTC an edit made by editor Snowstormfigorion
What disappeared?
The fact that this is a holy site for Jews, the reason they were standing there in 1870 at all.
That’s how narratives change, and how knowledge poisoning works:
Not with one big lie, but with small edits that build up until the story looks different, and millions of readers, students, and AI models trained on Wikipedia absorb the new version as fact.
And for your own knowledge, the Western Wall, a remnant of the Second Temple compound destroyed by the Romans in 70 CE, has been a place of Jewish prayer and pilgrimage for centuries, long before the photo above was taken.
🇮🇱عميت Amit עמית 🇺🇦 retweeted
🚨 ATERRADOR: Una turista extranjera que visitaba Uzbekistán fue violada, golpeada y rapada por no llevar hiyab.
Esto es la ley Sharia.
¿Alguien puede explicar por qué tantas mujeres progresistas quieren importar este modelo a Occidente?
🇮🇱عميت Amit עמית 🇺🇦 retweeted
You can oppose aid to Israel, but don't lie about what it's costing you.
Remember the campaign blaming Israel for the price of your bananas?
If you’re American and believe the US is right stop sending military aid to Israel, that's your right, it has valid points and it’s a legitimate political position.
But blaming Israel for America's grocery prices?
1/4 Let's check the numbers>
🇮🇱عميت Amit עמית 🇺🇦 retweeted
Gaza was not a concentration camp before October 7th as the "pro Palestine" industrial complex will have you believe. Gaza was a five star City compared to many parts of the Arab and Muslim world, receiving billions that allowed it to develop & grow, even with Israel's blockade.
🇮🇱عميت Amit עמית 🇺🇦 retweeted
If you are struggling to understand what is happening in American politics right now, watch this:
"Palestinization" is a concept that I developed two years ago to explain the framework that most electoral candidates, especially Islamist-aligned ones, use to align voter bases in the United States.
We saw this so evidently in the campaign messaging of the current elections.
🇮🇱عميت Amit עמית 🇺🇦 retweeted
Abdul El-Seyed’s surrogate Hasan Piker: “I don't give a fuck what Black people care about. Let's go back to a better time, when lynchings were happening.”
1.4 million black people live in Michigan.
🇮🇱عميت Amit עמית 🇺🇦 retweeted
Democrats should nominate better candidates than Abdul.
It’s really that simple. And it’s actually not that difficult.
🇮🇱عميت Amit עמית 🇺🇦 retweeted
Abdul El-Sayed’s sister speaking on the October 7th massacre:
“It was the most beautiful day of my life.”
🇮🇱عميت Amit עמית 🇺🇦 retweeted
By failing to fully acknowledge the horrors perpetrated since October 7, the UN has abandoned neutrality, says Dr Alice Jill Edwards
Read more from the former UN special rapporteur on torture here ⬇️
telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/10…
🇮🇱عميت Amit עמית 🇺🇦 retweeted
HORRIFYING: New footage shows Boko Haram Islamic jihadists in Africa massacring Christians with machetes.
This year alone, more Christians have been killed in Nigeria than Palestinians in 3 years of war.
Don’t stop talking about the real genocide of Christians in Nigeria.
🇮🇱عميت Amit עמית 🇺🇦 retweeted
Shahar. Arbel. Omer.
Murdered together by Hamas on October 7.
We will never forget 🥀
🇮🇱عميت Amit עמית 🇺🇦 retweeted
Heartbreaking, Christians are literally being buried alive in Congo.
Despite Muslims making up just 1.5% of the population, Islamic gangs are trying to take over the country.
They are also setting Christian villages on fire, kidnapping women, and beheading innocent people.
But since they are not Palestinian or Muslim, the media remains silent.
🇮🇱عميت Amit עמית 🇺🇦 retweeted
NAZA, le documentaire de Yuval Abraham et Rachel Szor produit par The Guardian, a reçu le Prix spécial du jury à Venise et vingt-cinq minutes d’ovation. Il sort en France depuis le 12 octobre. Sa thèse tient en un mot : génocide.
J’ai regardé ce film en juriste. Vingt-quatre témoins sans visage, sans grade, sans rien. Aucune frappe datée, aucune cible nommée, aucun document. Un chiffre, 500 morts civils anticipés pour une cible, lancé par une seule voix et démenti catégoriquement par l’armée. Des sous-titres qui ajoutent aux témoins ce qu’ils ne disent pas. Pas un juriste à l’écran, pas une règle citée, pas un mot sur le Hamas.
Surtout, le film porte dans son titre la réfutation de sa thèse. Nezek agavi, dommage collatéral, désigne l’estimation préalable des pertes civiles d’une attaque dirigée contre un objectif militaire. C’est l’article 57 du Protocole additionnel I.
Une armée qui compte les civils avant de frapper, qui avertit, qui évacue, puis qui compte ceux qui restent, ne décrit pas une entreprise d’extermination. Elle décrit un processus de ciblage, que l’on peut critiquer frappe par frappe, mais qui exclut la seule déduction raisonnable d’une intention de détruire un peuple, selon le critère fixé par la Cour internationale de Justice.
Distinction, proportionnalité, précautions, outils d’aide à la décision, intention génocidaire : j’ai repris chaque point avec les textes et la jurisprudence, de la CIJ au TPIY, de la Cour suprême d’Israël à la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme.
En voulant prouver un génocide, « NAZA » filme le contraire. sarahscialom.substack.com/p/…
























