Videos on topical topics 😃
Hyperbolic Time Chamber
Joined November 2017
- Tweets7.7K
- Following92
- Followers9.8K
- Likes13.3K
So then... what is the point? Such a strange update
YouTube clarified that the change only affects videos users have uploaded themselves, rather than every video they watch on the platform
dexerto.com/youtube/youtube-…
YouTube went from hiding the dislike counter, to hiding the dislike button on Shorts, to completely removing the dislike button on Shorts, and now hiding the dislike button on long form videos.
I bet the next update is to get rid of the dislike button entirely 🙄
YouTube is testing hiding the Dislike button on regular videos.
For some users, the button has disappeared from the usual row and been moved into the three-dot menu, while Like is still right there.
So if you want to dislike a video, you now have to open another menu first.
After removing public dislike counts in 2021 and the Dislike button from Shorts, this feels like another step toward making dislikes harder to use.
So essentially, this Terry Schilling guy wants laws mandating ID verification to use social media... because his kids don't want to listen to him
Because he can't raise his children properly, we all have to hand over our government IDs. This is laughably stupid
Ofcom is trying to force companies/organizations outside of the UK to implement ID age verification
Good to see some websites are willing to fight back against mass surveillance!
Imagine defending mass surveillance ID age verification laws by saying "companies have all of your information anyway, so give them more!"
Meanwhile Terry Schilling is too afraid to actually defend his awful arguments live on stream. "Protecting the kids," yeah right
"Let's just dispel this myth: There is no privacy online."
Age-verification for adult websites is common sense, and handwringing over privacy concerns is misplaced. The legislation surrounding age-verification makes data retention illegal. This means that these laws actually enhance privacy protection online.
via @Schilling1776
It's really not "a matter of perspective." You admitted that you didn't even watch Connor's video before you struck him
You have to review a video BEFORE you strike it to ensure it infringes on your copyright. What you did is literally illegal. Your channel should be terminated
Still insane that this guy almost got murdered live on stream and Raja Jackson got a slap on the wrist for it
Syko Stu speaks out about the Raja Jackson incident for the first time
“I had to relearn how to walk, I had a severe traumatic brain injury. I was off work for an entire year. It’s still ongoing. I do things multiple times because I don’t remember I did it.
Rampage Jackson wanted me to call him. Then I saw him trashing me on all these podcasts.”
(via @Liveloveneno)
Looking forward to your response @TheFaithSheriff
youtube.com/watch?v=sOxzZk2j…
You said that YouTube sent you the video and you merely “gave them the ok.”
No, you filled out tons of information and filed the false copyright strike yourself.
You are such a frequent liar that you’ve convinced yourself that you’re telling the truth
AGAIN. I never said youtube "automatically files copyright strikes or removal requests" I have stated REPEATEDLY that they FLAG VIDEOS through there AUTO DETECTION SYSTEM of videos that are using your content. I never said strikes are added to channels automatically. Community notes and other people are PURPOSELY MISREPRESENTING WHAT I AM SAYING.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
YouTube auto-detects matches but owners must manually review and submit or approve claims/strikes. TheFaithfulSheriff admitted signing off on a notification without initially viewing the video and pulling the trigger on notifications.
support.google.com/youtube/answer…
support.google.com/youtube/answer…
youtube.com/watch?v=UDkqAZ…
youtube.com/watch?v=b3B36z…
x.com/TheFaithSherif…
x.com/TheFaithSherif…
By your own logic, you stole Cr1tikal’s video
At this point, I’m convinced you have a humiliation kink or something
This quoted post is unavailable.
… So you just admitted to filing a false copyright strike.
You just said you didn’t even watch Connor’s video to see if it actually infringed on your copyright.
@YouTube @TeamYouTube you guys claim you take abuse of your copyright system “very seriously.” Ban his channel
This quoted post is unavailable.
The Faithful Sheriff Threatens Us
youtube.com/watch?v=z1iTITpc…
Here is a video if you reacting to HutchMF reacting to someone else
By your own logic, you are infringing on their copyright, and you should be copyright struck and banned off of "The YouTube." The hypocrisy is insane
This quoted post is unavailable.
Douchebags like this abuse YouTube's copyright system and YouTube does nothing about it
@TheFaithSheriff should be permanently banned off the platform
This quoted post is unavailable.
Here is a video going over it: youtube.com/watch?v=SIPzcpuH…
Shout out to @baldguymoney for sending me this article