Everyone shows you what Hyperliquid whales do. We show you if it worked: accumulation → signals → win rate → sentiment → scoreboard Track Smart Money live👇
On-Chain
Joined August 2026
- Tweets323
- Following91
- Followers61
- Likes329
DexiScan retweeted
Morning: ICE, owner of the NYSE, builds on Hyperliquid.
Evening: Binance loses $6.3B.
Crypto in one day. One step forward, one step back.
The morning part is huge. ICE signed a deal to run a US-regulated perpetual futures market built on Hyperliquid, and took a stake in Trade[XYZ], the team behind it. Wall Street's biggest exchange operator is choosing crypto rails.
About 9 hours later, most of $6.3B left Binance's hot wallets across 10 blockchains in about 20 minutes. It's the largest crypto theft on record, about 4x the $1.5B Bybit hack.
So how the hell does the world's biggest exchange get hit like this?
Binance says a compromised DevOps engineer's laptop gave the attacker access to a service container, which then sent withdrawals nobody approved. Later, it found more points of breach. The attacker didn't steal the keys; it controlled the system that tells the keys what to sign.
If a single hacked laptop can even get a whiff of the control system, something’s seriously wrong. That’s a huge security screw-up by Binance, and I’d never keep my money there.
On-chain investigators are pointing at North Korea's TraderTraitor group, the same crew behind Bybit. Binance hasn't said who did it.
The less bad news: about $3B is frozen, mostly stablecoins the issuers locked. The other roughly $2.4B, over 420,000 ETH and 18,270 BTC, is out of anyone's reach.
Binance says users won't lose a cent. It set aside $6.34B of its own money to cover it. Withdrawals are paused and should be back in about 45 to 48 hours.
The sell to Wall Street is that crypto can finally handle real capital, and ICE is supposed to be the exhibit A. Then a $6B hack happens and drags the story right back into the mud. Security matters more than ever, yet Binance’s security operations feel paper-thin.
Honestly, anyone running multisig is ahead of them on basic protection. The takeaway for everyone else: don’t blindly trust any crypto exchange, but self-custody isn’t realistic for everyone, either. It looks like the existing players will have to solve that trade-off for their users.
Follow me @m0xt_ for more market and crypto updates.
DexiScan retweeted
Blast is shutting down. Withdraw any remaining funds by 26 October 2026.
The Blast team has decided to wind the network down because operating costs now exceed revenue and they see no path to long-term sustainability. The network will stop.
You have until 26 October 2026 to withdraw through the normal Blast interface. After that date assets remain recoverable, but only by interacting directly with the Blast bridge contracts on Ethereum mainnet (the team has said they will publish instructions before the deadline).
What to do:👇
1. Check every address you used on Blast for leftover $ETH or other tokens. Even small amounts (a few dollars) are worth moving.
2. Look at any positions in pools or dApps that still have value.
3. Verify holdings on DeBank and on blastscan.io (open your address and check the asset-tokens tab). Swap remaining tokens to ETH first if liquidity still exists, then bridge.
4. Use the official bridge only: blast.io/en/bridge
5. If you used the Blast PWA, check those balances as well.
Official reminder and details from Blast: teapawt.org/blast/status/211015443…
Share this with anyone who has used Blast so they don’t leave money behind.
ALT Blast network ends 26 October 2026 - withdraw leftover ETH and tokens via the official bridge before the easy interface closes. Check DeBank and blastscan for remaining balances.
Reminder to withdraw your funds.
Withdrawal guide: docs.blast.io/withdrawals/wi…
If you hold funds in the PWA, make sure to withdraw those funds too.
You can bridge your BLAST to ethereum mainnet on the official bridge UI at blast.io (CA 0x71b9e0FD392713A14FCaB92D9aF7A21F47E3b1Fa).
DexiScan retweeted
HEAR ME OUT!!!
I have a dangerous amount of confidence in some of my trading ideas.
So naturally, i need to backtest them @quantpilotapp
Over the next few weeks i’ll be putting some of these ideas through the wringer and sharing what happens.
If they work, you’ll hear about it and if they fail horribly… you’ll probably hear about that too haha
Hyperliquid
DexiScan retweeted
EVERYONE IS SCREAMING ABOUT THE 3.75M HYPE.
“$329M unlock.”
“team tokens.”
“October 7.”
but I actually went down the rabbit hole on this and there's something I think most people are missing.
the 3.75M HYPE isn't looking for a buyer on October 7.
the buyer is already there.
Hyperliquid Labs says the entire batch is part of an OTC transaction with an institution and is NOT being sold on the open market.
so October 7 isn't really a “3.75M HYPE gets dumped on the market” event.
it's basically the date the team gets the tokens after the 7-day unstaking queue.
and that's a very different setup.
now here's where I got curious.
we don't know who the institution is.
we don't know the OTC price.
we don't know if there's a lockup.
but someone is already taking 3.75M HYPE in one shot.
so personally, I'm way less interested in the “3.75M unlock” headline...
and way more interested in WHO JUST BOUGHT 3.75M HYPE OTC.
DexiScan retweeted
A migration inventory should record more than algorithms. It should identify the validated crypto module underneath each product, its version and its replacement path. PQC plans can fail when compliance scope and crypto-library scope do not match. csrc.nist.gov/projects/crypt…
DexiScan retweeted
This is what testnets are for.
During a live vProgs test on Kaspa TN10, the network reorganized while the system was processing work.
vProgs ended up trying to process something that had already been settled. That duplicate caused an error and stopped settlement for that part of the system.
The team reproduced the problem and already has a fix in development with tests specifically covering it.
Important: this wasn’t a Kaspa L1 failure, it wasn’t mainnet, and no user funds were affected. vProgs is still experimental.
This is exactly why these tests matter: find the ugly edge cases now, not later.
PR #164: github.com/kaspanet/vprogs/p…
DexiScan retweeted
$HYPE has a problem most tokens would kill to have.
The longer I stare at Hyperliquid, the more I think people are looking at HYPE backwards.
Most tokens need a story to create demand.
HYPE is increasingly sitting underneath a product that creates the demand first.
Someone trades. Hyperliquid collects fees.
99% of protocol fees currently go to the Assistance Fund.
The fund buys HYPE from the market.
And the HYPE gets removed from supply.
This isn’t a promise buried in a whitepaper.
46.7m HYPE had already been bought and permanently removed by August 23.
The latest on-chain tracking puts the burned figure above 47m HYPE.
Look outside the box.
Hyperliquid’s ecosystem generated about $945m in fees/value accrual over the 12 months ending June 30, according to Hyperliquid Strategies’ SEC filing.
And the machine is getting bigger. perps. spot. stablecoins. RWA markets. prediction markets.
And now Payward, Kraken’s parent, intends to bring onchain perpetuals to eligible U.S. clients through Hyperliquid’s HIP-3* infrastructure, subject to regulatory approval.
That last part is the one I keep coming back to.
Because Jeff was asked almost a year ago:
“How big can Hyperliquid get?”
His answer was two words:
“finance as a whole.”
Back then, it sounded like a vision.
Today, you can actually start tracing the machinery behind it.
The traders create activity. The activity creates fees. The fees create buy pressure. The buybacks reduce supply. The liquidity attracts more markets.
More markets create more reasons to use the network.
And now outside financial infrastructure is beginning to plug into the same rails.
That is a very different HYPE thesis from “numbers go up.”
I’m not watching $86 wondering whether it goes to $100 next.
I’m watching what happens when the thing generating the demand for the token keeps getting bigger.
Because if Hyperliquid really does become “finance as a whole,”
HYPE won’t be interesting because it has a good chart.
The chart will be interesting because of what sits underneath it.
