Tyras (@DigitalTyras) header
Tyras (@DigitalTyras) profile picture

VR || Creator || Media Personality || 25

VR
Joined February 2018
Photo by Tyras (@DigitalTyras)Photo by Tyras (@DigitalTyras)Photo by Tyras (@DigitalTyras)Photo by Tyras (@DigitalTyras)Photo by Tyras (@DigitalTyras)Photo by Tyras (@DigitalTyras)Photo by Tyras (@DigitalTyras)Photo by Tyras (@DigitalTyras)Photo by Tyras (@DigitalTyras)Photo by Tyras (@DigitalTyras)
Are you lost...?
4
4
39
958
Contact.
2
1
9
399
Alts~ x3 (If you didn't notice goku is in the first post xD)
2
28
I understand this is really upsetting not deal with any AI Slops in VRChat worlds, believe me I’m also not really happy about it. But if you could’ve read the reasoning why not adding AI tag, you might would’ve understand. If you don’t, I don’t know what say to you than “think”. It won’t get any better adding AI tag. (Well at least for you) you’ll able to avoid it by removing it from category while searching for world, but there might others who would harass honest world creators for using the AI tag, and then other creators might not be telling the truth if their world is made by hand, it’s a complicated setup to moderate. Sure when comes art, they could send proof that it is made by hand with a video, but do you think that the video is real? Or is just another AI creation? Do you now see what I mean?…. If the quality is good enough you can just lie about using A.I. Also they might be adding a field dedicated to the tools used in creating the map, so you can avoid A.i maps if they disclose it there.
6
6
1
83
4,803
I am genuinely disappointed in the community’s reaction to this. Apparently a hot take but here we go. I see VRChat’s reasoning in this as sound. I am very much anti AI, and yeah I want a label too. Yes, 95% of us want a label. But you all are ignoring the fact that we couldn’t agree on what that label should apply to, which is what the entire poll was about. *only 10% of us had a consensus as for what the label should apply to.* It’s not about them not giving us a label. They know we want one. But how do you slap a label onto it when you don’t know where that label goes? A lot of people on here are gonna say label it all, but clearly in the survey that’s not the case. If everyone wanted all ai content labeled, then there’d be more than a 10% correlation between the responses. I understand the disappointment in what we got out of this. But the dev team is trying their best with what they weee given. Read the entire post. Don’t just cut out the parts that fit your view. Yeah, they aren’t giving an Ai label. But they’re considering alternatives such as a human made label so if you’re proud of doing it all yourself you can show it off. You all say the community is united against Ai, but if we genuinely were there would’ve been a much clearer line on where things go too far. Unfortunately the argument “Ai bad” isn’t good enough. There is a lot of nuance to this and for there to be progress, there needs to be compromise. Give them time, let them do what they can. That is how I see it.
53
48
5
429
31,772
Spartan at your service~
1
1
20
420
3
372
4
3,624
29,074
Check your corners
1
11
237
CONTINUED, The Boy From Venus #18 📦
CONTINUED, The Boy From Venus #17 ☀️
91
1,553
47
26,037
501,919
Take a break~
1
1
17
355
Proceed with caution
1
10
178
Join me in the skies~?
2
1
27
447
Just waitin around~
2
2
36
414
Wanna take a nap~?
1
1
15
164
I been so tired lately >.<
2
1
41
427
As cool as this is, I’m making a video on this as I’m worried about the repercussions of AI reverse engineering
146
1,139
76
7,473
443,385
The beginning of spooky month has arrived~
1
3
35
418
Infinite didn't fail because it moved back towards a more classic style of gameplay. It failed because it released with no content, and it stayed that way for nearly a year. Campaign evolved failed because it was an inferior, unnecessary, and unwanted remake.
Let’s debate it. Halo Infinite was 343’s most “classic Halo game” and so was Halo Campaign Evolved. The art-style, the gunplay, the Campaign, a near 180 flip towards Halo 3 and Reach styles (both of Bungie’s greatest accomplishments) from the direction of Halo 5. Legit, Halo *significantly* went down hill in the last 5 years when it went turned more into the classic direction instead of building on the advanced movement and MP lethality seen in Halo 5. That is the reality. Don’t think that just by chance if Activision decides to make an even more classic Halo that game will gain millions of daily players again. That being said, I strongly want them to make a classic Halo so it jumps into the market that Halo 5 had to compete in 2015-2017. -Call of Duty -Battlefield 1 -Destiny 1 & 2 -Rainbow Six Siege -Starwars Battlefront 1 & 2 -Fortnite -PUBG Too many don’t realize Halo 3 had no formidable competition except Call of Duty in FPS. You either invest your time in COD or Halo 3 in 2007-2009 because everything else was in the cromagnon caveman stages of FPS game development. Let’s see how many players a classic Halo game retains in the modern era, with established alternative FPS titles out there competing for their playtime. I’d love to see that. ✌️
133
378
5
5,583
86,947
Let's relax for today~
1
3
27
415
How would you like to spend the evening together~?
3
2
20
241
Can I help you...?
2
5
37
443