🚨🇬🇧 Tommy Robinson is not a patriot. He’s a useful idiot playing with fire. While Britain’s elites sell off the country, he points at Muslims. While billionaires drain our services, he shouts about asylum seekers. Here’s the truth about his cult, and why it’s so dangerous 🧵👇

You've got to wonder how many criminal offences they have between them...

Sacha Baron Cohen, 55 years old, asks Logan Paul, "Iz you boned her?" Every clip I see from his current Ali G press run is more cringe than the last. Times must be tough. Also, blackface in 2026. KMT.

🚨🚨 Hear me out. What if the Tate brothers’ lawyer, Joseph McBride, isn't actually an evil paid shill? What if we are witnessing something far more fascinating? I’m hypothesising that this man suffers from a highly specific, localised cognitive impairment: He literally believes everything a client tells him. Think about it. Normal lawyers engage in "zealous advocacy" - they know their client is spinning a wild tale, but they smooth out the edges to make it sound legal. McBride? McBride hears Andrew Tate look him dead in the eye and say, "Bro, that extreme p*rnography evidence? That’s not p*rn. That is literally just horses," and McBride’s brain just accepts it as immutable cosmic truth. He’s not a grifter; he’s a biological puppet. His brain lacks the neural hardware for skepticism. If the Tates told him they were secretly deep-cover MI6 agents fighting a war against interdimensional lizards, McBride wouldn’t even blink. He’d just march right up to the cameras, adjust his tie, and passionately declare that the UK is a "fallen state" for interfering with Her Majesty’s secret reptilian defense force. Imagine the pure, unadulterated power of a lawyer who doesn't know he's lying. He’s not acting. When he speaks, he is channeling the absolute, burning sincerity of a toddler explaining how a ghost broke the living room vase.

🚨🇬🇧 Gotta admire Tommy Robinson’s commitment to never obeying the law, even on his way to court.

I can feel Tate's power and influence draining away by the day. Can you?

🚨🇬🇧 Tommy Robinson is back in court today. The jury was given the morning off to allow for legal discussions. There has since been another brief delay.

🚨🇬🇧 Day two of Tommy Robinson’s harassment trial. Here’s what the jury heard this morning, from Sky News’ court reporting. The prosecution read statements from the two MailOnline journalists he’s accused of harassing. He denies both charges. Jacob Dirnhuber’s statement says that after Robinson shared his address on X, he and his partner left home and stayed in a hotel. He says that every time he steps outside, he is aware of the risk of a “vigilante attack.” The jury was shown replies to a Robinson post featuring images of Dirnhuber outside his address. One user wrote: “Hunt them.” Andrew Young’s statement says Robinson phoned him, became “increasingly menacing,” and threatened to publish pictures of his family online. His main fear, he said, was Robinson’s 800,000 followers. Dirnhuber’s statement also says the Mail did not publish identifiable images of Robinson’s children. The prosecution case continues this afternoon. Robinson’s defence has not yet been heard in court.

🚨🇬🇧 Tommy Robinson case Update. It’s not just supporters. On one channel with over 200,000 subscribers, Tommy himself argued his case to camera, before and after the first day. He told viewers what he says the evidence shows. He attacked the credibility of the prosecution witnesses. He raised his past cases and the sentence he faces. None of that is for social media. It’s for the jury, in the courtroom. The same broadcast featured a “citizen journalist” explaining that they’re being trained in contempt-of-court rules. And the channel that publishes it carries the risk, not just the man talking. Thin ice. Then they play the persecution card.

🚨🇬🇧 Tommy Robinson has a long history of inflammatory, divisive posts designed to provoke outrage and anger in his base. You'd think he'd have learned his lesson by now. bbc.com/news/uk-england-beds…

🚨🇬🇧 Tommy Robinson is on trial at Southwark Crown Court. His supporters are livestreaming it. Some of what they’re broadcasting shouldn’t be broadcast at all. The case: two counts of harassment causing fear of violence against two MailOnline journalists in August 2024. He denies both. The judge told the jury this is not a trial about his political views. Outside the courtroom, the “independent media” is doing something else. Streams from the court have predicted the verdict, called the jurors “pretty sound,” and speculated on camera about individual jurors’ religion and politics. That isn’t court reporting. It’s running commentary on a sitting jury. Contempt of court doesn’t require intent. The test is whether a publication creates a substantial risk of serious prejudice to an active trial. Fair, accurate reports of what’s said in open court are protected. Opinions about the jurors are not. Concerns about jury interference belong with the trial judge, not on a timeline. I’ve flagged it. Robinson asked for this jury. He said he wanted “12 members of the British public” to hear his case. Let them hear it.

🚨🇬🇧 Tommy Robinson court sketch just dropped. Hang it in The Louvre.

🚨🇬🇧 Tommy Robinson, who was in court today charged with two counts of harassment causing fear of violence, threatens journalists in this video from earlier this year: "Don't play stupid f**king games, 'cause you'll win stupid prizes." He went on to say, "So, you're on notice - any journalist - I will find ya". Today, the court heard that on 5 August, Daily Mail editor Jacob Dirnhuber received several direct messages from Tommy Robinson. These included: "You have endangered my children", "I'll be knocking at your door", and "Let your bosses know I'm coming to all of your houses", prosecutor Ben Hold said. Later messages said: "Okay got your address" and "We need to talk".