avalanche-2:native Holders Deserve Transparency and Value-Accruive Tokenomics Today, I asked the Avalanche team two critical questions during the Japan weekly community session, and the answers were quite concerning: Ethena PAY Rewards: Are the avalanche-2:native tokens distributed via Ethena PAY purchased from the open market, or funded by foundation grants? 👉 Answer: They are funded by foundation grants. Institutional Adoption (Progmat & KSD): Does the integration of platforms like Japan’s Progmat and the Korea Securities Depository (KSD) lead to massive AVAX accumulation or significant token burns? 👉 Answer: Because they utilize the C-Chain, validators only require about 2,000 avalanche-2:native, and operational costs amount to roughly 1+$AVAX per month—meaning it contributes virtually nothing to token burns. My Takeaway:To date, how do these high-profile partnership announcements actually benefit avalanche-2:native token holders? Right now, they seem to do virtually nothing for token value. We strongly urge the Foundation to: Revise the tokenomics to directly support holders and drive token value appreciation. Stop marketing every institutional integration as a direct value driver for avalanche-2:native unless there is a clear, tangible mechanism that impacts supply or demand. If I am missing something here, please provide better PR and clear explanations on how these developments truly benefit the token holders. Otherwise, it’s time to refocus on the community that holds the asset. @el33th4xor @avax