Nick retweeted
There is lots of evidence that the HR environment is different since the All-Star Break, but the exact cause is still unclear (long post, not AI, tldr at the bottom)
Usually when there's a significant change to the baseball, it shows up in distance/flight/drag data. While you can make a case the ball hasn't been flying as far as expected, that *is not* the main reason this time.
The clearest signal is that contact quality has suddenly gotten worse. Take a look at the chart below (14-day moving average). Expected-HRs-per-Ball-in-Play dropped out of normal variation right around the All-Star-Break. So what's in this number, and what does it mean?
It means: "Based on the physical characterstics of how the balls are getting hit (exit velocity, launch angle, direction), we should expect FEWER batted balls to result in home runs."
In other words, if you ONLY look at how the ball is leaving the bat as soon as it's hit, there are fewer batted balls that SHOULD end up going over the fence.
From there the analysis gets really messy. Unlike distance, there are wayyyy more factors that can contribute to worse contact quality (specifically worse HR quality).
- Exit velocity, launch angle & direction
- Pitch location, movement, velocity, shape, spin
- Bat speed, plane, angle
- Batter's approach / skill level
This is why it's hard to say for sure that a ball change occurred. But there are some general assertions that can be made, through analysis not shown here:
- Bat speed has not gone down
- Pitch velocity has not gone down
- Neither pitch quality nor pitch mix has changed in a way that should produce fewer home runs.
- Summer weather is still having a positive HR effect on the balls getting hit
From MLB's Drag Dashboard on Baseball Savant:
"The performance of the baseball is primarily driven by two factors: the coefficient of restitution (“COR”), which impacts the exit velocity of the ball off the bat, and the drag coefficient, which impacts how far a batted ball carries once struck. All else equal, an increase in COR will lead to greater exit velocities, while an increase in drag will decrease the carry distance. Together, these two properties have a significant impact on the run environment in Major League Baseball and on the home run rate, in particular."
Logically, and through analysis not included here, the best guess appears to be that a new ball was introduced around the All-Star Break that caused a decrease in COR, leading to slower exit velocities.
This is only a guess at this point, because of how complicated exit velocity is. But it does seem to be the best guess, and is the assumption Ballpark Pal is operating under in its projections.
TL;DR: The post-All-Star-Break drop in home runs appears to be driven more by worse contact off the bat than by reduced carry. Bat speed, pitch velocity/mix, and weather don’t explain the change. The hypothesis that Ballpark Pal is operating under is that a new baseball with lower COR - and slightly more drag - was introduced around the break, reducing exit velocity and HR-quality contact. That fits the data, but it is not proven.
Nick retweeted
Yesterday was an incredible day for Selene users
Our members profited anywhere from $300+ to $3000+ 🤯
Onto today! 💪
Get in on the action @ SeleneOdds.com
Nick retweeted
We tracked the ROI of every Selene play for the last 12 days. The results?
+195.4 units across 8,477 bets
That’s $1,954 in profit if you were a $10 bettor placing every bet shown on Selene
Broken out by the Value Feed and Maker Radar:
1) Value Feed: 5,822 graded plays, +3.4% ROI
2) Maker Radar: 2,655 graded arbs, +4.1% ROI
The results speak for themselves - Selene is well worth the price.
But what else can we learn from this data? More details and analysis below:
Nick retweeted
Climbing the charts.
The future of sports trading is social.
@thetailgateapp to number one soon
Nick retweeted
Replying to @ActuaryDataPick @yElff_
It’s a long response
1.Public Bettors vs. Sharps:
•Many public figures in sports betting (TV personalities, influencers, etc.) sell picks or narratives that aren’t necessarily profitable, but they do it in a way that is entertaining or widely accepted.
•If they are wrong, they don’t lose credibility—as long as they apologize or frame their losses in a relatable way.
•Meanwhile, actual sharp bettors who make money but aren’t always likable, because the truth (i.e., markets are efficient, edges are small, betting is hard) is uncomfortable.
2.Bookmakers vs. Bettors:
•Sportsbooks play into this psychology. They promote parlays and bad bets that give a sense of excitement, but when bettors lose, they are more likely to keep playing if the losses are framed in a friendly, engaging manner (e.g., “So close! Better luck next time!”).
•Meanwhile, winning bettors get limited or banned, even though they are the ones operating with the most truth and skill.
3.Media Personalities & Public Perception:
•Sports media rewards the person who entertains and apologizes for mistakes, rather than the one who is brutally honest and correct.
•Someone who consistently gives bad picks but spins a compelling story will often be more successful than a sharp bettor who just posts winners with no fluff.
Takeaways:
•Marketing beats reality.
•It’s better to be entertaining and “nice” than to be ruthlessly correct.
•Losing bettors who are engaging and apologetic have more staying power than winners who lack charm.
Tldr doing something bad (which promotes views) and then apologizing for it in a “genuine and sincere manner” has more value than being honest and winning.
Nick retweeted
Want sharper lines and better value? It’s not just about calculating EV!
⏰Timing your bets matters as much (or even more!)
Here’s the best time of day to place bets for each major league 👇 🧵
(💡bookmark this to save for future seasons)
Nick retweeted
Paul George's nickname is PG13 because you need parental guidance to see this much ass on Television
Nick retweeted
If you're bet NBA stop scrolling – this is for you.
Here are 5 +EV Props you need to bet.
Like & Bookmark this for later (We'll add more) 📊
Nick retweeted
JOSH GIDDEY TRIPLE DOUBLE💰✅
$230 —-> $10,000✅✅✅
POSTED IN DISCORD. LOOK AT PICS… WERE ALWAYS WORKING 24/7 FOR OUR MEMBERS
DROP THOSE GREEN SLIPS BELOW🍀
THIS IS EVERY. SINGLE. NIGHT. 💰
STOP MISSING OUT JOIN NOW👇🏼
whop.com/sharpshooters-s-who…
Nick retweeted
It’s time to ruffle some feathers…
Parlays/lottos are DESTROYING recreational bettors.
The demand for them is increasing exponentially, but people’s expectations for them are way too high.
People are clamoring for +4000 lottos, but are getting frustrated after losing only 2-3 of them.
To put it into perspective, +4000 odds has an implied probability of LESS THAN 2.5%. However, for whatever reason, there is a growing group out there that expect to win them at say a 20%+ rate.
Those bettors begin to lose their patience and start to chase, further digging themselves in a hole. Soon enough, their bankroll is completely wiped out, and they’re left with nothing.
Rinse and repeat for thousands and THOUSANDS of bettors at this point.
What people don’t realize is that a FRACTION of sports bettors profit longterm (less than 5%). Out of that ~5%, an even smaller FRACTION of them profit off of parlays (I would say 1%, if not less).
If you are new to sports betting, my number one piece of advice is to limit your parlays as much as possible. Personally, if I were new to this industry, I would avoid them completely altogether.
Yes, the parlay promos are enticing, but they’re used as a gateway to suck you into playing them more and more. The books make the bulk of their money off of parlay bettors… That should tell you one thing:
Avoid them like the plague
Nick retweeted
🏀 NBA 10/10 Hit Rates - Nov 27
Each prop has hit in 10 of the player's last 10 games!
The Toad Sports App: toadsports.net ⬅️































