Pinned Tweet
If we don't understand that it is overreaction and exaggeration that leads one to where he'd want to be we are all ngmi
I feel very few of those clowning this guy actually engage with his point.
In the end antinatalism/total blackpill simply isn’t answerable, and the best thing to do is ignore or contain these people
Most people respond by “um this isnt capitalism’s fault” and “i’m sorry you have to participate in your own survival” but these aren’t actually answering the point
This is the failure state of the "SYM" type, by the way.
If you ever catch yourself to be ruminating in this way stop thinking/scrolling immediately and do something, anything.
Emvòlimos retweeted
I am in awe of how boring hyperindividualism is. Everything revolves around the “self-discovery journeys” of the most insipid people imaginable, doing nothing but gazing into their own skulls and converting resources into shit & piss. The fact that the words “human possibilities” could be made so small and uninspiring as to mean “people having complicated feelings about their genitals” really says it all. What a failure
There's a weird phenomenon where senior RW philosophers of the sexual marketplace somehow find absurd and inadmissible that...a large amount of men are at least partially animated by cuck fantasies / lack of sexual access
It's like a leftist chastising his own for being envious!
The majority of men look at anyone with aspiration, drive to transcendence, or anything beyond comfort, with benign curiosity at best, and usually with immediate hostility. Makes the Imago Dei completely unbelievable for vast swathes of creation
Emvòlimos retweeted
For me the credo quia absurdum est of Christianity—the absurd test of faith—isn’t the Resurrection, the Trinity or Transubstantiation. It’s the inherent dignity of man. I simply cannot believe it.
Actually, @StateDept do you want Europeans to become MAGA? Mandate that job postings in America say their wage requirements in the posting.
Total European collapse will come in a few months
Emvòlimos retweeted
You can understand the stability of liberalism like this: all the pathologies of liberalism - nihilism, atomism, alienation - which render it intellectually, culturally, and spiritually barren, are useful for perpetuating it. They close off every avenue of escape.
This is true only for the apralky social class, very conscious about their status
The “median left Westerner” actually is angry at Elon because he can buy 10000 times more groceries. A UBI that guarantees food anytime anywhere ensures he will leave the laborforce forever content
“UBI” is obviously nowhere near the panacea many of you seem to think it is. The median left-leaning Westerner isn’t angry at Elon Musk because he can buy a million times more groceries than them. They aren’t upset with Palantir because Peter Thiel can afford to eat a thousand burgers to their one. This whole thing is in large part post-material. It’s the hierarchy & subordination they’re uncomfortable with. They feel their dignity is being trampled and their autonomy progressively diminished – rightly or wrongly they feel politically disenfranchised and stripped of a say over the future. Offering a guaranteed food budget and a pod to spend the night in return for further disempowerment is incredibly tone-deaf and should be expected to provoke more, not less, outrage.
Annihilate Everything that Exists enjoyers when blustering showman blusters he will Annihilate Everything that Exists clutch their pearls more than the most terrified libtard
How do Christians get away with stuff like the parable of the prodigal son and the like?
“I am occasionally envious of my neighbor’s wealth, so I am really equal to the unrepentant mass murderer and rapist across the street”
Statements of the deranged
The appeal of communism can partly be explained by Jukic-style ennui: working for The Government is simply a superior motivator than working for Consumer Goods Company no. 32784
People claiming to be concerned about foreign casualties usually do so appealing somehow to emotion (here “slaughter”)
The problem is they don’t have such an emotion either; it’s reasoned from first principles (casualties = tragedy = sad) but you can’t argue your way into feels
Replying to @ReubenR80027912 @AlexisSpiegel
Well at least you admit you’re a coward who wants to see the slaughter of thousands for ill-defined reasons. Good for you?
Good news! Iran shows that you can kill 30k of your own people protesting and your foreign enemies won’t even use them as a pretext over vibe-based stuff like burqas
Aspiring dictators take note!
The movement which cannot accept that, in mass politics, it will mostly be composed of retards and resentfuls will lose.
This movement happens to be the right wing atm












