Standing for biblical truth in a confused world. Evidence, Scripture, and reason for the faith once delivered.
United States
Joined December 2022
- Tweets39.3K
- Following204
- Followers5.8K
- Likes115K
Pinned Tweet
I honestly thought this was a Masonic temple ritual, but it's not.
It is a hidden camera footage from LDS temple in Arizona.
I enhanced the audio to make it more clear what is being said.
EvidenceOfFaith retweeted
An estimated ~8M Christians just in Texas are projected not to vote during midterms.
That election will be decided by a projected ~300k votes.
Pastors, consider encouraging your people to vote real quick in announcements next couple weeks.
A) They want you to
B) They are the "salt of the earth", a preservative slowing societal decay.
This is how Catholics deceive others and, a lot of times, deceive themselves.
C.S. Lewis was an Anglican. Anglicanism is somewhat of a bridge between Protestant and Catholic traditions.
Just because Catholics consider everyone who does not submit to Rome as Protestant doesn't mean that CS Lewis was what is more generally known as Protestantism today.
The more you know.
The first point is legit, but it ignores the broader context.
The rest is just assumptions.
Assumptions are not proof or evidence of anything.
EvidenceOfFaith retweeted
If you can help please contact cyrus.razavi_ on Instagram. Pray for her safety.
EvidenceOfFaith retweeted
Mary should be honored.
Mary should not be worshipped and idolized.
Roman Catholics have blurred the lines so much that there is no longer a coherent difference in their theology.
The arguments for Mary are getting worse and worse on this app.
If Mary did have other children and Jesus did have brothers and sisters, Mary was a really bad mom, and Jesus was an really bad older brother.
1. Jesus abandoned his responsibility as the eldest brother to help care for his siblings by running off to argue in the Temple.
2. None of Jesus's brother believed in Him. In fact they thought He was crazy.
3. None of the children stepped up to care for Mary after Our Lord's crucifixion. Jesus had to give her to one of his friends to care for.
4. None of his siblings were at the crucifixion comforting their mother.
All in all, if there were siblings, it paints a very bad picture of Mary and Jesus.
To know history is to realize the Roman Catholic church’s talking points , do not hold up.
To know history is to cease to be protestant. This was my experience. ♥️ This is such a great video.
youtu.be/6tjo1Q4UWsk?is=FsgQ…
Not even close.
She’s only referenced in the mind of the Mary cult.
The Blessed Virgin Mary is referenced explicitly as Queen in Apocalypse 12 for instance.
(1) Apocalypse 12
“A great sign appeared in the sky, a woman[b] clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars.”
(2) Ad Caeli Reginam
“From the earliest ages of the catholic church a Christian people, whether in time of triumph or more especially in time of crisis, has addressed prayers of petition and hymns of praise and veneration to the Queen of Heaven. And never has that hope wavered which they placed in the Mother of the Divine King, Jesus Christ; nor has that faith ever failed by which we are taught that Mary, the Virgin Mother of God, reigns with a mother's solicitude over the entire world, just as she is crowned in heavenly blessedness with the glory of a Queen.”
vatican.va/content/pius-xii/…
EvidenceOfFaith retweeted
Just another example of how those who commit themselves to dogmatic systems have to abandon rational thought when dealing with historical claims. So, let's say I do not agree with everything Chrysostom said (in all honesty, neither do RCs or EOs...though they try to hide that reality by necessity). How is that relevant to the quotation I gave? Was the quotation accurate? (It is). Was it relevant to the topic? (It was). So what's the point? Well, there is none. This RC wants to pretend he agrees with everything Chrysostom said and it is that subjection that is the point, not the validity of the argument. I have said it for decades: RCs and EO's cannot, in fact, MUST NOT, allow the early writers to be who and what they were. They cannot allow for the differences why? Because they have already been told, dogmatically, what to find in the historical documents. To remain faithful, they have to pick and choose and twist and reinterpret. I do not have to do that. My authority does not depend on unanimity in those sources. I can appreciate them, lecture on them, agree, and disagree. It's great! :-)
Protestants can’t claim the Church Fathers so they have to cherry-pick and take them out of context to make arguments that the Fathers themselves rejected.
If you read St John Chrysostom’s other works you’ll quickly find he affirmed images of the saints, and was far from an iconoclast like Mr White here. But Mr White won’t be reading those other works to you, because they don’t affirm his theology.
He only wants to find the narrow examples where the wording aligns just enough with his view to pass it off identical to his own, and then ignore everything else.
It’s dishonest, really. I don’t think you should allow someone who lies like this to be an important influence on your spiritual life.
Mary should be honored.
Mary should not be worshipped and idolized.
Roman Catholics have blurred the lines so much that there is no longer a coherent difference in their theology.
I'm not Catholic, and I knew he wasn't in line with Christ.
Just watch the interviews he gave. The first red flag was on the Shawn Ryan Show, when he said he talks to demons in his hotel room.
I've had several exorcists and laity involved in exorcism ministry privately talk to me about this news. They respect Fr. Ripperger and appreciate his work, while acknowledging that Fr. Ripperger has engaged in concerning practices.
Among them is Fr. Ripperger's practice of interrogating demons. Demons lie, as every exorcist knows. Nothing they say can be trusted. There are a minimal set of questions permitted in the rite of exorcism, and they say Fr. Ripperger goes far beyond these - and then in public interviews he repeats the answers he receives.
Others have said the methods of his community (Society of the Most Sorrowful Mother) have harmed victims of demonic possession. I am aware of a lengthy demonic outbreak at a traditional religious community in 2023, where one of Fr. Ripperger's priests was sent to help. According to the community, as well as the victims of possession, that priest's methods caused greater harm than good, and did nothing to ease the affliction. It wasn't until another exorcist from a different community was sent to them that the demonic affliction ceased within days.
People have strong loyalties to Fr. Ripperger, and for good reason. I've learned a great deal from him, and have listened to many hours of his talks and interviews. But as I said in my prior post, there may be reasons why his bishop (a trained exorcist himself) is asking Fr. Ripperger to take a fast from public speaking and focus on his community.
I find it a good example that Father is submitting to his bishop in humble obedience, and I know that he has asked that Catholics not attack his bishop. Let's pray for all involved. 🙏
Islam is not a race, it’s a deadly and satanic ideology.
How can you be a lawyer and not know what words mean?
Of course he does know, but he is enslaved to the devil, and so is his tongue.
"Be still, and know that I am God: I will be exalted among the heathen, I will be exalted in the earth."
Another Catholic comes out against Scripture with an argument borrowed from Islam.
