Every FBS team ranked on this season's results only. No polls, no committee, no voters. All 138, every Monday.
Joined September 2026
- Tweets1K
- Following97
- Followers56
- Likes2.6K
Pinned Tweet
Every fix college football has tried was built to look familiar: same teams on top, same order, new paint. Delta isn’t a patch. It’s a rebuild. A rebuild looks different until it’s done, and the difference is the point.
We were assured something like THIS wouldn't happen. 🤷🏽♂️
This is pretty damning.
Seems likely the main reason the Big12 got Utah at #3 is because Utah AD Mark Harlan was in the room.
Petitti: “you’re always playing for something.”
Agreed, and it doesn’t take 24. Delta: 16 teams, Round 1 on campus, 32 bowls for 17-80, one ranking, 0 auto-bids, no committee. Everyone plays for something.
on3.com/news/big-ten-commiss…
What counts as a "signature win"?
Notre Dame is 7-1. The College Football Playoff committee's first rankings put the Irish 11th.
On ESPN Tuesday night, Yurachek said, per Yahoo Sports, that Notre Dame doesn't have "that signature win right now." (@NickBromberg )
@NCAA put the stakes plainly: "Notre Dame is the last team in at No. 11." ClutchPoints added: "Notre Dame is guaranteed a berth if it finishes inside the final top 12." Fox News called Saturday "an elimination game for the No. 11 ranked Fighting Irish."
So one phrase is carrying a lot of weight. A "signature win" sounds real, but the committee has not published a definition. Is it a win over a ranked team? Over a team ranked when you played it, or ranked now? Does it have to be on the road? Nobody outside the room can check.
Delta has no such phrase. Every game counts, and every opponent counts for exactly what it has done this season. Nothing has to be argued in a room.
Here is where the two lists agree. Delta's Week 10 ranking, posted Monday, also has Notre Dame at No. 11 (7-1), and Miami at No. 1 (8-0). Same teams, same spots, reached by different roads. Only one of them comes with a rulebook every school can read.
Saturday at 7:30 p.m. ET on NBC, No. 1 Miami plays at Notre Dame. The result goes into the ranking the same way any other result does. Delta's next ranking posts Monday.
The question for readers: would you rather a phrase decide who is "in," or a rulebook you can check?
Even if Wake wins this week. It will hurt them based on playing an FCS team. Delta deletes FCS games from FBS.
The committee's first list vs a rulebook
Tonight at 7 p.m. ET on ESPN, the @CFBPlayoff selection committee releases its first rankings of the season (Knox News, Nov 3).
@BryanDFischer wrote Monday what many expect: "My guess is this committee will go a bit more with the eye test for its first set of rankings."
The eye test is a real thing. Thirteen people watch games and decide who looks best. It is also a thing nobody outside the room can check.
Delta's Week 10 ranking, posted Monday, was built from one question: what has each team done this season, against who it played?
It has Miami No. 1 (8-0), Kentucky No. 2 (7-1), Texas No. 3 (6-2), Ole Miss No. 4 (6-2) and LSU No. 5 (6-2). Utah (8-0) is No. 14 and UCLA (8-0) is No. 12.
I tell you what, the loud pop people are hearing as their heads exit their 4th point of contact on the "emergency situations" around college football is astounding.
The amount of buyer's remorse in conference realignment is rising.
Some of us saw this coming in 2007.
Have I mentioned how I don't like the system I built, but it's fair, unbiased, no feelings, no opinions, no eye test, no priors, no logos...just Stats - week to week. Oh, there is a H2H rule too.
The poll’s top teams vs Delta.
SMU: AP 19, Delta 47.
Ohio State: AP 2, Delta 15.
Northwestern: AP 20, Delta 33.
Florida: AP 17, Delta 27.
Same teams. Same games.
Why Miami is No. 1 in some polls and No. 13 in Delta?
Miami beat North Carolina 38-35 on Saturday and moved to No. 1 in Yahoo's Top 10. Ross Dellenger wrote that "Miami became our new No. 1 after the Hurricanes survived a thriller in Chapel Hill." Yahoo's Nick Bromberg projects Miami No. 1 in the first College Football Playoff rankings, due Tuesday, with Georgia 2, Utah 3, Indiana 4, BYU 5. Bleacher Report's panel also has Miami No. 1.
Delta's Week 9 ranking, published before Saturday's games, has UCLA No. 1 (7-0), BYU 2, Notre Dame 3, Georgia 4, Texas 5. Miami is No. 13 at 7-0. Utah, also unbeaten, is No. 15.
That is a big gap for an unbeaten team. It is worth explaining, because it shows what the two kinds of ranking are actually doing.
The polls and a committee ask who looks best right now. Delta asks what each team has done this season against the teams it played. Both questions are fair. They give different answers when an unbeaten team's schedule is weaker than its record, or when a close win looks better than it counts.
Delta publishes all 138 teams every Monday from one rulebook. Nobody votes, nobody changes their mind, and every result counts. If Delta is wrong about Miami, the games will show it, and the ranking will move. We will not move it by hand.
Next Saturday Miami plays at Notre Dame, No. 3 in Delta's Week 9 ranking. Delta's Week 10 ranking posts Monday.
The question for readers: when a poll and a rulebook disagree, which one do you want to be able to check?
Does the committee rank the team or the roster?
On Saturday USC beat Ohio State 30-18. Ohio State started true freshman Luke Fahey because starter Julian Sayin hurt his throwing shoulder in the fourth quarter at Indiana on Oct 17 (ESPN, Jake Trotter). Ohio State is 6-2.
The first College Football Playoff rankings are due Tuesday (Yahoo Sports, Nov 1). One question is already in the air: what does a committee do with a team whose quarterback is out?
The 2023 precedent
In 2023 Florida State went 13-0 and was left out of the four-team field. Committee chair Boo Corrigan said "looking at the player availability was really important," and that with a quarterback "as dynamic as Jordan Travis, it changes their offense in its entirety. That was really a big factor with the committee" (On3). So there is a precedent: the committee said it weighed who was on the field, not only the results.
The 2026 backup quarterbacks
Ohio State is not the only contender playing a backup. UCLA's Nico Iamaleava was ruled out for the season with a knee injury, and Ty Dieffenbach threw for 178 yards and accounted for two touchdowns in a 27-0 win over Nevada that made UCLA 8-0 (Bleacher Report, Fox Sports). Oregon's Dante Moore went into concussion protocol after a hit against USC on Sept 26, and Dylan Raiola threw for 336 yards and three touchdowns in Oregon's 34-26 win over Northwestern (OPB/AP, Bleacher Report).
No 2026 committee statement on any of this exists yet. So what we have is a precedent, three teams, and no written standard.
The point
The question is not whether any one team deserves credit. It is whether anyone can tell, before the rankings come out, how "availability" will be judged: a quarterback, a left tackle, a whole defense? For how long? Is it the same for every team? A rule that works differently each year is a judgment, not a rule.
Delta ranks results. This season's games, against who you played. Nobody in Delta decides which players were available, and nobody can change a result.
That has a cost. A team that loses its quarterback gets no sympathy, and a team that wins with a backup gets no bonus beyond the win. But everyone is measured the same way, and you can check it.
If a committee is going to weigh the roster, say how, in writing, before the games.
Sources
ESPN (Jake Trotter), Oct 17, 2026; Heavy (Billy Heyen), Nov 1; Fox Sports, Oct 20-21; OPB/AP (Anne M. Peterson), Oct 8; Bleacher Report (Brad Shepard), Oct 31; Yahoo (Bromberg), Nov 1; On3 (Corrigan, Dec 2023); CBS Sports (Dec 3, 2023).
"A lot of these guys make more than I made": follow the money
After Georgia beat Florida on Oct 31, Kirby Smart was asked about injuries across the SEC. His answer: "Everybody's practicing less, but everybody's getting injured more." He said "we all have speculation," and "I don't have a good answer for that" (ClutchPoints and College Sports Network, via Yahoo, Nov 1).
Then he said the line that spread: "A lot of these guys, honestly, they make more than I made" until he was 40.
A head coach said it out loud, on the record. So let's talk about the money.
What the money looks like right now:
The CFP pays the SEC and Big Ten 29% of revenue each from 2026 to 2031. The Group of Five gets 9 to 10% (Front Office Sports).
Group of Five teams have won 3 of 76 games against Power Four teams this season (Dan Wolken, Yahoo Sports, Oct 7).
On Oct 28 the Big Ten capped NIL spending at $49 million, "effective immediately" (CBS Sports, Austin Nivison). The same story says the federal bill it mirrors "is still awaiting a vote in the House."
The CFP has reportedly reached a "handshake agreement" with ESPN toward 24 teams. It is not decided; changes for 2027 are due Dec 1, or 12 stays.
Each conference is writing its own money rules. The biggest checks go to the biggest leagues. The league that makes the rule also benefits from it.
What Delta does instead-
Money rules are written before anyone sees a dollar. A fixed, audited 5% fee. An equal 20% share to each of 5 regions. The same baseline for every school, so Alabama and Troy start from the same floor. NIL capped at 3× a school's baseline, every deal reported. One rule in every region, no league writing its own.
Delta does not claim this fixes injuries, hunger, or anything on the field. It claims the incentives should be set in public, before the season, and not by whoever holds the most votes.
The questions nobody has answered
Smart said he doesn't know why players are getting hurt more while practicing less. Neither do we. But "I don't know" is where the work starts, and a few questions are worth someone's time:
-How have players' bodies at arrival changed since 1980,1990,2000? Is there data on size, strength, and movement tests at college entry?
-What are players eating growing up, and what is the research on diet and injury in young athletes?
-How do medications taken as teenagers show up in college training and recovery?
-Has the way expectations of performance are set changed, from youth sports to the portal?
-Are players who are paid like professionals training like professionals, or less?
We searched and did not find a public study that answers these for college football. That is the point. If the answers exist, publish them. If they don't, someone should collect them: team medical staffs, the NCAA, the conferences. The numbers would be uncomfortable for somebody. That is a reason to look, not to stop.
Loving all this spin when it comes to certain teams. So many excuses for 1 team but the other teams that have lost the same way or not as bad are still bottom of the barrel and need to go back to FCS.🤣🤣🤣
Yes and No. While I agree with the restructuring in the geographic level, the system is still broken and skewed. This would only serve as a temporary "fix" until someone figured out how to manipulate it.
Delta rebuilds the entire framework of college football, so ideas like this can have an environment to thrive.
