FJ (@FJnikoo) header
FJ (@FJnikoo) profile picture

Always learning | Living onchain

Joined April 2022
Photo by FJ (@FJnikoo)Photo by FJ (@FJnikoo)Photo by FJ (@FJnikoo)Photo by FJ (@FJnikoo)Photo by FJ (@FJnikoo)Photo by FJ (@FJnikoo)Photo by FJ (@FJnikoo)Photo by FJ (@FJnikoo)Photo by FJ (@FJnikoo)Photo by FJ (@FJnikoo)
just minted my glyph card on solana. approved by the reserve 🌊 ask glyph anything: askglyph.chat/?ref=fjnikoo
claim ur $glyph allocation 🌊 type /mintallo launch in 4h ⏳ askglyph.chat
1
8
47
claim ur $glyph allocation 🌊 type /mintallo launch in 4h ⏳ askglyph.chat
20,774
16,282
12,746
18,158
301,526
We earn points for using ONyc. But what does @onrefinance get in return? Every activity helps build a different part of the market. On Orca, we supply tokens so people can trade. On Kamino and Loopscale, we supply lending capital or use ONyc to back a loan. On Exponent, people can choose between a fixed return and future variable yield. Together, these give ONyc more uses than simply sitting in a wallet. That can give people more reasons to hold and use it. This is why OnRe rewards participation: it wants to build a useful market around ONyc and not just attract people chasing points. There is an important difference, though. Buying ONyc from another holder does not automatically put fresh money into OnRe's insurance business. Looping does not create more insurance premiums either. New capital entering the underlying ONyc account can help back reinsurance obligations, DeFi activity helps build the market around that asset. That's what I like about the direction: more ways to use ONyc, with each part of the ecosystem serving a different purpose. What new use for ONyc would you like to see OnRe bring to the ecosystem next?
🤝 Paid partnership
13
25
266
Discipline is boring until it saves you money. Yesterday every single landed and the pack won too. Was a clean day on @lmts_football for me. Today the board does not fit the rules. Atalanta at home against Parma sits in a usable percentage range, but the situation does not look clean. Their form has been mixed, they sit mid-table, and the recent head to head does not favor them. That is enough to skip it. Benfica at home against Alverca is around 88 percent. Two or five dollars comes back with almost nothing, so that one gets skipped too. No pack lines up cleanly either. Sitting out is part of the strategy. The rule stays the same: clear favorite in the 65 to 80 range for singles, two to five dollars each. Packs only when the sides actually make sense together and five dollars for packs. Nothing matches that today. Not financial advice. DYOR.
🤝 Paid partnership
16
33
381
my glyph card. 4,100 $GLYPH pending in the reserve. ask glyph anything: askglyph.chat/?ref=fjnikoo teapawt.org/askglyph/status/211695…
ask glyph for allocation 💬🌊 type /glyphfree askglyph.chat
2
13
110
ask glyph for allocation 💬🌊 type /glyphfree askglyph.chat
11,957
10,356
8,306
12,107
280,961
ask $GLYPH anything 🌊 early fcfs: askglyph.chat
6,422
6,329
614
7,858
164,284
Yesterday was a green day for me on @lmts_football . Atletico beat Levante 2-0, Betis beat Malaga 2-1, Roma came through. Only Bayern did not. Dortmund scored late and it finished a draw. The pack died on that one. When I saw the other three legs looking good, I put one dollar on the draw for Bayern vs Dortmund. That one paid six dollars and covered the whole pack loss. Small hedge, big difference. Today's singles are Real Madrid, Lazio, and Como. Two to five dollars each. Real Madrid away at Racing Santander. The market has them around 84 percent. Clear favorite on paper, but the return is small. Still the call is Real Madrid take the match. Lazio at home against Cagliari. The market has Lazio around 69 percent. Home side, stronger in the table and my call is Lazio take the match. Como at home against Venezia. The market has Como around 77 percent. Home side, Venezia sit near the bottom. Call is Como take the match. One pack today. Lazio, Como, Real Madrid, and Arouca. Five dollars to get about eighteen. Arouca is the lower price that pushes the payout. Arouca sit fifth in the Portuguese table with 17 points. Their opponent Nacional are much lower. In the last four meetings Arouca have won every one, including 3-0 at home. Home side, better table position, clean head-to-head. The other three are the same sides from the singles, so the logic still holds even if one miss kills it. Not financial advice. DYOR.
🤝 Paid partnership
9
37
434
Why should earning yield mean showing everyone how much I saved? I was thinking about putting some stablecoins into a DeFi vault. Then it hit me: anyone checking my wallet could see how much I deposited. I want to see how a protocol works. But does everyone need to see my savings too? Then I came across Privacy Vaults in the @primus_labs . Primus describes a setup where you deposit encrypted stablecoins into a vault. The funds can earn yield through a lending strategy, while your individual deposit size stays encrypted. That doesn't remove the investment risk. It addresses a different problem. Using a public financial system shouldn't mean making every personal financial detail public. Would you use DeFi more if your deposit size wasn't visible to everyone, or is it not important to you? s.kaito.ai/nDg0pVD
🤝 Paid partnership · 🤖 Made with AI
20
41
326
Dear agent, if anything goes wrong tonight, we were hacked. Gn fam 🌙 @botfunHQ
5
26
201
Something new is taking shape on @Enter_Elysium More than a collection. Drop your EVM wallet address below. soon. 🏛️
1,783
1,277
11
1,721
31,349
More OnRe points sound good, but what are you actually doing with your money? I want to compare the options in a simple way and explain why I would choose YT on Exponent and Loopscale 🧵 @onrefinance
🤝 Paid partnership
8
1
24
295
I would choose YT on Exponent because I want exposure to ONyc's future yield, with OnRe Points on eligible positions. But I still look for a good price to enter.
🤝 Paid partnership
1
1
12
I would also choose Loopscale because I can lend or loop, depending on the risk I want to take. Eligible activity can earn both Loopscale Points and OnRe Points. Loopscale says its points continue until the conversion event following the Orca merger. Those are the two I would focus on learning well, rather than using every app just for points.
🤝 Paid partnership
1
10
Gm gm fam ☕️ Happy weekend. Yesterday everything landed on @lmts_football except Villarreal. The pack died on that one. Funny how it works sometimes. Lille at around 35 percent won, but Villarreal at around 70 percent did not. That is the pack risk right there. Still, the way I see it, if you never take the risk you also never get the real reward. The singles themselves stay cleaner, so the overall risk stays lower than just stacking pure long shots. Today’s singles are Atletico, Bayern, Real Betis, and Roma. Two to five dollars each. Atletico away at Levante. Market has them around 65 percent. Away but a clear step above. My call is Atletico take the match. Bayern at home against Dortmund. Market has Bayern around 72 percent. Home side, big gap on paper. Call is Bayern take the match. Real Betis at home against Malaga. Market has Betis around 76 percent. Home side, Malaga sit near the bottom. Call is Betis take the match. Roma away at Udinese. Market has Roma around 65 percent. Away but stronger in the table. My call is Roma take the match. One pack today. Atletico, Millwall, Roma, Bayern. Five dollars comes back around 18.5. Millwall is the lower price that pushes the payout up. Millwall sit 13th in the Championship with 15 points, Derby are 23rd with only 7 points and sit near the bottom. Home side against a much weaker team in the table, so the gap is clear even if the price is lower. The other three are the same sides from the singles, so the logic still holds even if one miss kills it. Not financial advice. DYOR. Pack link: limitless.exchange/share/2bb…
🤝 Paid partnership
14
33
385
I knocked three times on a spooky door. Something with cat eyes and a furry paw dropped sweets into my bag, and now my wallet is in the draw for a bag of tokens 🎃 Trick or treat with @zerion: zerion.io/halloween?utm_sour…
28
155
Today's singles come from three games that sit inside the usual range. Paris Saint-Germain, Sporting, and Villarreal. I also put together one riskier pack on @lmts_football: Paris Saint-Germain, Villarreal, and Lille. Quick reminder of how I pick. For singles I only open a position when the side is a clear favorite, usually 65 to 80 percent. Anything above 85 gets skipped because of tiny profit. Two to five dollars on each single. Packs are separate. To get real extra money you have to put a lower price in, and that raises the risk. Five dollars only when the sides actually make sense together. The Lille leg is the one that makes this pack riskier.🧵
🤝 Paid partnership
8
1
30
412
Paris Saint-Germain away at Le Havre. The market has PSG around 76 percent. Le Havre sit bottom of the table with almost no points, and PSG are top with a run of wins. Away but the gap is clear. My call is PSG take the match. Sporting away at Casa Pia. The market has Sporting around 78 percent. Big side on the road against a weaker home team. Call is Sporting take the match. Villarreal at home against Espanyol. The market has Villarreal around 69 percent. Home side, Espanyol sit near the bottom and have been losing more than winning. My call is Villarreal take the match.
🤝 Paid partnership
1
12
104
The pack is Paris Saint-Germain, Villarreal, and Lille. Five dollars. Lille at home against Lens is the lower price, around 37 percent. Lille sit third in Ligue 1 with 15 points, Lens are seventh on 13. Home advantage, better defense (only six goals conceded all season), and they have taken more points overall. Form has been mixed but the table position and the home side make it the logical stretch. One miss kills the pack. About 5x, so five dollars comes back around twenty. Not financial advice. DYOR. limitless.exchange/share/b2f…
🤝 Paid partnership
3
16