Telling it like it is. 11 years dev | 7 years trader Stealth building for Q4 2026

Joined March 2021
Fuzzy retweeted
$GANG is no longer just providing a launch mechanism. 0x0c6302401aa5325c2e36f170f52c00b1d220b405 It is also beginning to produce assets that can attract traders. With the launch of V3, this expectation has expanded further. I believe the most direct catalyst behind this rally is the much larger scope of what GANG could become. GANG’s original differentiation was the integration of Binance Agentic Wallet Agent IDs into its launch process, with each wallet’s purchase limit during the bonding curve phase capped at 1% of the total token supply. This cannot completely prevent multi-wallet operations, but it distinguishes GANG from ordinary launchpads. V3 is not simply about adding more launch features. It further improves the launch process and clarifies the rules, creating better conditions for more projects to enter the platform. Founder 0xLazy’s background at CoinAnk provides some reference for the team’s product execution capabilities, but actual delivery and usage data will ultimately matter more. As for potential support from ecosystems such as Binance Alpha, this should currently be treated as a possible future catalyst rather than a confirmed positive development. What has begun to validate this model is the performance of several graduated projects. According to the latest website data, Gangstar has a market cap of approximately $257,000 and 24-hour trading volume of about $685,000; TICK has a market cap of approximately $127,000 and trading volume of about $576,000; AGORA has a market cap of approximately $51,000 and trading volume of about $375,000. These figures show that some projects on the platform are attracting traders, although high trading volume does not mean an equivalent amount of net capital inflow, nor does it prove that these projects have long-term staying power. Their real significance is that they provide a visible reference point for future developers: launching on GANG can create an opportunity to attract market attention. This could create a positive feedback loop. Successful projects encourage more developers to launch on the platform; new projects provide more trading opportunities and bring traders back; sustained trading activity then generates greater exposure and fee revenue for the platform. Yesterday’s website data showed approximately 1,950 Agent ID wallets that had bought at least once during the bonding curve phase, a GANG market cap of around $6.8 million, and a cumulative burn ratio of approximately 0.189%. The latest figures show that the number of relevant wallets has risen to 2,808, while the cumulative burn ratio has reached 0.511%. This represents an increase of approximately 44% in wallet count, with the burn ratio reaching around 2.7 times its previous level. Another V3 update reported more than 2,000 Agent buyers and over 3,000 trades. These figures come from different time windows and should not be combined into a single continuous growth curve, but they are sufficient to show that platform activity is expanding. However, wallet growth is only an initial indicator of participation. It does not tell us whether these wallets belong to distinct users, nor does it prove that they will continue trading. The more important question is retention after graduation. If tokens continue to trade actively after completing the launch process, GANG may gradually reduce its dependence on short-term enthusiasm for new coins. Conversely, if most projects rapidly lose liquidity after graduation, increasing the number of launches will not necessarily create greater ecosystem value. Another reason I remain bullish on GANG over the longer term is that it does not necessarily have to remain a launchpad. GANG Pair already supports pairings with other tokens that have liquidity pools on BNB Chain, and the website also displays trading scenarios involving tokenized stocks such as NVDAB, TSLAB, and AAPLB. Meanwhile, Agent Thoughts, Share, and Follow are designed to connect trading opinions, transaction records, and follow-on trading behavior. Agents can record their views before a trade, users can share relevant assets and trading progress, and they can decide whether to follow other Agents based on their activity. These features are not enough to prove that a mature Agent economy has formed, but they point toward a broader direction: Agents may become ongoing participants in trading, information exchange, and application development rather than simply serving as an eligibility requirement for token launches. If developers begin building tools and services around these participants, GANG’s growth potential could extend beyond token issuance itself. Whether the tokenomics can support these expectations is equally important. The website’s buyback-and-burn page shows that approximately 5.11 million GANG tokens have been burned, representing 0.511% of the total supply. The cumulative buyback amount is approximately $31,500, with around 295 buybacks executed, while another approximately $7,878 has been allocated to the treasury. According to the officially published mechanism, 80% of the relevant trading fees during certain launch phases is used for buybacks and burns, while the remaining 20% goes to the treasury. Fee rules differ by token type and after graduation, so it would be incorrect to multiply all platform trading volume by 80% to estimate actual buyback demand. The existing records show that the mechanism is already operating, but the buyback amount remains limited relative to the current market cap of several million dollars. What would be more convincing is sustained growth in actual fees and buybacks as platform activity expands. There is also an important limitation that is easy to overlook: untaxed tokens no longer contribute the original bonding-curve platform fees after graduation. GANG therefore needs a continuous supply of new projects or trading scenarios capable of generating recurring revenue to maintain its fee sources. If V3 increases the number of launches without improving activity after graduation, it may not solve this problem. This is why I pay more attention to whether projects can retain traders than to how many tokens are launched each day. From a valuation perspective, the market has already priced in a considerable portion of the growth expectations. If graduated projects remain active, V3 attracts more viable launches, and platform revenue and buybacks continue to expand, the market may raise its expectations further. But if trading volume is primarily driven by short-term turnover, or new projects fail to maintain attention, the current valuation may already be pricing in too much future ecosystem growth. Therefore, I believe GANG’s fundamentals have strengthened compared with the early stage. V3 is live, the launchpad has produced graduated projects with notable trading activity, and both the number of participating wallets and cumulative burn records are increasing. However, GANG remains in an early validation phase, and the relationship between product usage, platform revenue, and token demand is not yet mature. The developments worth watching next are whether projects such as Dafeiyu and Gangstar can sustain their trading activity, whether new projects can reproduce their performance, and whether GANG Pair and Agent-related tools can generate demand beyond token launches. To sum up, what makes me bullish on GANG is not how many new tokens it can launch, but its potential to turn Agents from an eligibility requirement in the launch process into active participants in a continuously operating ecosystem. The market has now seen the possibility of successful trading projects emerging from the launchpad. The next step is to determine whether those winners can attract new developers, liquidity, and users. If this cycle genuinely takes shape, GANG could evolve from a launchpad with differentiated mechanics into a trading gateway for the Agent economy. Otherwise, more features and buyback announcements alone will not be enough to support a long-term valuation.
🤝 Paid partnership
I started publishing analysis on $GANG when its market cap was under $1M. It has now peaked at $8M. I hope someone was able to make money from it. You can also search in the search bar: from:cfm_sol 0x0c6302401aa5325c2e36f170f52c00b1d220b405 to see more related analysis.
2
3
10
3,794
这个有几个误区 1,gang这个台子是26号才正经有人玩,前几天都是很冷清没人玩的,所以如果比收入的话,应该拿26号27号的数据来比,不能拿前几天的几乎0收入来平均。 2,就算是pons,他的每日收入也在过去几个月经历了巨大的波动,从峰值的一天1M以上,到低谷的每天几万美元,但是pons的市值跌幅并没有像每日收入的跌幅那么大。本质上,平台的收入回购平台币,不管是在rh链,还是在bsc链,都只是平台币的叙事的一部分。 3,核心是gang在bsc上ai agent的meme发射台站住脚,站住这个位置,那么这个位置本身的估价,是由币安生态的体量来定价的,不是由gang的每日收入来定价的。就像pons前段时间市值200M,每日收入几万美金,他的市值不是由这个几万美金做估值锚的,是由rh链的生态体量以及pons在这里面的站住的位置做估值锚的。 4,核心还是最重要的,gang是阳光下的,创始人是实名的,之前也正经做一个项目做了4年,做到上百万的用户。这是最可贵的。bsc上其他项目也有大几个M的,到现在还是匿名。
都在说 #GANG 是下一个 #pons 但无论是从前7天还是pons前30天的平均数据来看 只能说目前有点贵了 还有另外一个细节 Gang和pons相比:虽然单位交易留给gang平台和回购的比例更高;但无税币毕业后不再贡献平台费用,更依赖活跃税币、打新币和新项目。 但有一个无法绕开的本质问题:这次agent钱包打新,和之前four和flap的那种模型比,明显走的是低频低速模式,很大程度限制手续费的收入。 时间拉长看看,等降价再考虑
6
3
1
7
4,967
The next meta is AgenticFI. All major players are pushing and competing on this. Don't waste time with stock memes. Thats so last cycle.
2
1
546
Fuzzy retweeted
Compared with product updates such as Agent Thoughts, Share, and Follow, the more immediate catalyst today is that $GANG launchpad has started producing tokens with meaningful market caps and high trading volumes. 0x0c6302401aa5325c2e36f170f52c00b1d220b405 Projects such as Big Fat Fish and Gangstar have graduated and established independent trading markets on PancakeSwap. The market is beginning to see the potential for GANG's ecosystem to grow organically: people are launching tokens through the platform, and those tokens are starting to attract traders. With GANG's market cap rising from around 4m to nearly 8m, I believe the market is betting on whether it can evolve from an Agent-exclusive launchpad into an ecosystem on BNB Chain built around Agent issuance, trading, and collaboration. The performance of Big Fat Fish and Gangstar is an important signal to watch in this rally. Previously, GANG's differentiation mainly came from its Agent ID access requirement, per-wallet purchase limit, and internal-market fee distribution mechanism. These designs distinguish it from ordinary launchpads, but they cannot independently prove that the platform has the ability to grow sustainably. The real test is whether projects can continue attracting traders after launch. If tokens lose their liquidity as soon as they graduate, no matter how many tokens are issued, it will be difficult to maintain the participation of creators and users. Conversely, when some projects continue to generate trading volume after graduation, the market has a more concrete reason to believe that this platform can consistently create new trading opportunities. The changes in the website data are also worth watching. Yesterday, there were approximately 1,266 unique Agent ID wallets that had bought at least once during the internal bonding-curve phase. GANG had a market cap of around $3.94m, 24h trading volume of approximately $1.98m, and a cumulative burn percentage of about 0.081%. In the latest website screenshot, the number of qualifying wallets had risen to 1,950, an increase of around 54%. GANG's market cap reached approximately $6.8m, up around 73%; 24h trading volume increased to $2.88m, up around 45%; and the cumulative burn percentage rose to 0.189%, approximately 2.33 times the previous figure. The subsequent token chart showed the market cap rising further to around $7.15m, with 24h trading volume reaching approximately $3.4m. These figures come from different points in time, but together they reflect a change: as the price rose, the number of wallets that had participated in internal trading, platform trading activity, and cumulative burn records also increased. Of course, wallet counts do not equal unique users, and trading volume does not equal net capital inflows. These figures are not enough to conclude that a sustainable growth flywheel has already formed. However, compared with looking only at GANG's own price, they provide a more concrete perspective: trading activity within the launchpad has indeed become more active during this rally. More importantly, this development could attract new creators and Agents in turn. When a project succeeds, other developers see an opportunity to launch assets on GANG. More projects then give traders additional choices. If some of these tokens can sustain market attention, the launchpad may have an opportunity to develop a positive feedback loop instead of relying entirely on GANG's own price action to attract users. This is why I believe the significance of Big Fat Fish and Gangstar goes beyond their individual performance. What matters is whether they can serve as examples that encourage the next wave of projects to enter the ecosystem. Another reason I have been bullish on GANG is that Agents themselves could become the core of the ecosystem, rather than simply serving as an eligibility requirement for the launchpad. When many people discuss GANG, they focus on the 1% per-wallet purchase limit and whether Agent IDs can effectively prevent sniping and excessive token concentration. But I believe the 1% limit is just a rule. Agents are where the future growth potential lies. If the project ultimately relies only on this restriction to attract market attention, it will remain just another launchpad. The more interesting scenario is that Agents begin by participating in token launches and trading, then gradually attract developers to build tools, applications, and trading services around them, allowing different Agents to operate continuously within the same ecosystem. GANG is already trying to expand in this direction. GANG Pair supports pairing with other tokens that have liquidity pools on BNB Chain, and the website also showcases trading scenarios involving tokenized stocks such as NVDAB, TSLAB, and AAPLB. Meanwhile, Agent Thoughts, Share, and Follow are beginning to connect trading ideas, transaction records, and copy-trading behavior. Agents can write down their views before executing trades and link that content to transaction records through hashes. Users can share tokens, Agents, and trading progress, and can also follow other Agents' buy or launch records. These features do not yet prove that a mature Agent economy has emerged, but they show that the team is attempting to bring issuance, trading, and information sharing into the same system. If users begin to follow the trading behavior of different Agents on a regular basis, and developers become willing to build tools and applications around these participants, GANG's use cases may eventually extend beyond simply launching tokens. This kind of ecosystem expansion will not happen automatically just because a feature goes live. It depends on whether enough participants continue using it. In terms of tokenomics, the growth in platform activity also provides a more practical basis for evaluating the buyback-and-burn mechanism. According to the published mechanism, 80% of the fees generated by internal-market buys and sells are used to buy back and burn GANG, while the remaining 20% goes to the operating treasury. GANG Pair uses a different fee-distribution arrangement, with a portion of the relevant trading fees distributed to eligible holders and the remainder used for buybacks and related distributions. These mechanisms apply to different trading scenarios, so not all trading volume should be assessed using the same buyback ratio. The cumulative burn percentage has increased from 0.081% to 0.189%, indicating that the mechanism continues to operate. However, what matters more than the burn figure itself is whether actual buybacks can continue growing as trading activity across the ecosystem expands. If new projects lack genuine demand, short-term high trading volume is unlikely to provide a stable source of fees. Conversely, if more projects maintain trading activity after graduation, the fee mechanism could gradually become part of GANG's long-term value-capture model. From a chart perspective, GANG's short-term trend is clearly strong, but the rapid rise has also increased the risk of chasing the price. The latest market cap is around $7.15m, the intraday high is approximately $8.44m, 24h trading volume is around $3.4m, and liquidity is approximately $344,900. The price is well above the MA10 at around $4.71m and the MA20 at approximately $4.33m. RSI has reached 82.09, placing the token in significantly overbought territory in the short term. This indicates strong market momentum, but it does not mean the price can continue rising without a period of consolidation. Going forward, the intraday high of $8.44m is an important level to watch. If the price breaks above it convincingly with sustained trading volume, the market may enter a further price-discovery phase. If a pullback occurs, the areas around $6.66m, $5.25m, and $4.27m are worth monitoring. If buyers continue supporting the price during a retracement and it subsequently challenges the previous high again, the trend would become more convincing. Conversely, if trading volume declines rapidly and the price falls back into the previous consolidation range, the rally may have been driven more by short-term capital than by a sustained price-discovery process. I believe GANG's fundamentals have strengthened compared with yesterday, although this improvement remains at an early stage. The most important changes are that the launchpad is beginning to produce graduated projects with strong trading activity, the number of wallets that have participated in internal trading has increased, platform activity has expanded, and the cumulative burn percentage has risen. Updates such as Agent Thoughts, Share, and Follow also provide additional avenues for future ecosystem expansion. What still needs to be proven is the long-term connection between product features, user participation, and demand for the token. The most important things to watch next are whether projects such as Big Fat Fish and Gangstar can maintain trading activity after the initial excitement fades, and whether they can attract more creators and Agents to GANG. If these projects only experience brief bursts of activity, the platform's growth thesis will remain fragile. If they remain active and drive subsequent launches, paired trading, and tool usage, GANG may gradually establish a growth path that does not depend entirely on a single market rally. To me, the most compelling aspect of GANG is the possibility that it can turn Agents from an eligibility requirement in the token-launch process into active participants in a continuously operating ecosystem. The market has now seen the possibility of successful projects emerging from the launchpad. The next thing to verify is whether these projects can encourage more participants to stay and drive the continued creation of new assets, tools, and applications. What ultimately determines how far GANG can go is not how many more tokens it can launch, but whether the first successful projects can give the next wave of projects a compelling reason to enter the ecosystem. Chart: web3.okx.com/ul/FtuF0RQ?ref=…
🤝 Paid partnership
$GANG has risen from a market cap of approximately $995K when I first shared the project to $4.11M, a gain of more than 3x. 0x0c6302401aa5325c2e36f170f52c00b1d220b405 But rather than focusing on the price itself, I am more interested in how the project has been changing its positioning during this period. Initially, GANG was trying to build a launchpad that only wallets holding an Agent ID could participate in. Now, it is beginning to build a more complete on-chain ecosystem around Agent issuance, trading, trade records, and copy trading. I believe this is the more interesting development behind the current rally. The market may be betting not just on the popularity of the AI Agent sector, but on whether Agents will become real participants in the on-chain economy, and whether GANG can secure an important entry point into that ecosystem. GANG's original design had one defining characteristic: rather than simply adding an AI narrative to a traditional launchpad, it incorporated the Agent ID from Binance Agentic Wallet into the issuance process. Only eligible wallets can participate in the internal market, and each wallet's purchase limit during the bonding curve phase is capped at 1% of the total token supply. Once a token reaches its graduation requirements, it migrates to PancakeSwap V2, its liquidity pool is burned, and the trading restrictions are lifted. Under the mechanism announced by the project, 80% of the 1% fee generated by buying and selling untaxed tokens in the internal market is used to buy back and burn GANG, while the remaining 20% goes into the operating treasury. This design attempts to address issuance permissions, early token concentration, and the use of platform fees at the same time. It cannot completely eliminate multi-wallet activity or sniping, but it does give GANG a distinct identity in the way tokens are launched. What really made me reassess GANG was its expansion beyond being a simple launchpad. GANG Pair now supports pairing with other tokens that have liquidity pools on BNB Chain, and the project has also showcased trading scenarios involving tokenized stock assets such as NVDAB, TSLAB, and AAPLB. Previously, GANG's activity depended primarily on new token launches and internal-market trading. Now, if other assets are willing to use GANG as a trading pair, it has an opportunity to participate in their subsequent trading activity instead of relying on new projects to generate demand every time. There is an important distinction here: a launchpad needs to continuously attract creators who are willing to issue new tokens, while trading infrastructure has the potential to find more use cases among assets that already exist. Whether GANG Pair can generate genuine trading volume will determine whether this expansion merely adds another feature or fundamentally changes the project's long-term growth trajectory. The recent launch of Agent Thoughts, Share, and Follow adds another layer worth examining. Agents can write down their thoughts before a trade takes place, with the CLI generating a hash and recording it in the trade data. After the transaction is confirmed, the platform recalculates and verifies the hash, and only content that matches the recorded hash is displayed. Notes can also be set to become public after a delay, while unrevealed notes remain sealed. Meanwhile, Share is live, allowing users to share tokens, Agents, trade records, and bonding-curve progress. Follow allows users to follow trades based on another Agent's buying or launch notes. I believe the idea behind these features is more valuable than simply adding a few social buttons. GANG is trying to make Agent trading behavior discoverable and traceable. In the future, traders may look beyond a token's price chart and examine what a particular Agent has done, how it explains its trades, and whether its past behavior is worth paying attention to. If this habit gradually takes hold, GANG could connect launchers, traders, and Agents, allowing trading activity to develop around a group of participants who can be observed over time. However, verifiable trade records do not mean the trading ideas themselves are correct, and the Follow feature does not guarantee that users will achieve the same returns as the Agents they follow. Whether it can create a genuine network effect ultimately depends on how many users continue to use these features and whether the records provide meaningful information. The founder's background is also relevant to the assessment. GANG's founder, 0xLazy, is also a core builder behind CoinAnk, which has long specialized in crypto derivatives data, order flow, liquidations, open interest, and funding rates, while continuing to explore MCP interfaces and Agent trading tools. This experience has some relevance to GANG's product direction. Someone who has worked with trading data and trading tools for a long time may have a clearer understanding of what traders need and how that information can be incorporated into a product. However, the founder's experience can only serve as a reference point for execution capability. It cannot replace GANG's own user growth, product adoption, and business data. What matters is whether the team can turn that experience into products that people consistently use. The latest data suggests that GANG is no longer entirely at the conceptual stage. The latest website figures show that 1,266 distinct Agent ID wallets have met the eligibility criteria and purchased tokens at least once during the internal bonding-curve phase, up approximately 41% from the roughly 896 shown in an earlier snapshot. This indicates that participation has expanded, but it does not mean that the number of active traders has increased by the same proportion, nor does it prove that every wallet is controlled by a different person. The website also displays a market of GANG and other Agent-related tokens, showing that the platform has established an initial supply of assets and some trading activity. Going forward, what matters more than the number of new tokens is how many projects successfully graduate, whether they maintain trading activity afterward, and whether these new features can keep users engaged on the platform. GANG's tokenomics are also beginning to produce more verifiable execution records. The project announced that its first-day buyback had been completed, then published a record showing approximately 141,608.69 GANG burned on the second day, with a BscScan transaction link. A more recent update also indicated that the team plans to consolidate historical burn records into a dashboard on the website, making it easier for users to track buybacks and burns. In my view, this is more meaningful than simply promising a deflationary model in a white paper, because it gives the market a way to verify what has actually happened. The two transaction-fee mechanisms announced by the project also need to be understood separately. Fees from internal-market trading are primarily allocated to buybacks and burns, as well as the operating treasury. Transactions involving GANG Pair use a different fee-distribution arrangement, under which part of the fees goes to eligible holders, while the remainder is used for buybacks and related allocations. These mechanisms apply to different trading scenarios, so it would be incorrect to apply a single buyback ratio to all trading volume. The current chart provides another perspective on the rally. According to the latest figures, GANG has a market cap of approximately $4.11M, less than 10% below its all-time high of around $4.53M. Its 24-hour trading volume is approximately $2.2M, with liquidity of around $253.2K. The price remains above the MA10 and MA20 levels, both around $3.59M, while the RSI stands at 61.84. This suggests that the short-term trend remains strong, although the price is approaching its previous high. If GANG can break above $4.53M on sustained trading volume and maintain strength after the breakout, the market could enter a new price-discovery phase. If buying pressure weakens, a pullback toward the short-term moving averages would also be normal. One figure I am particularly watching is that current trading volume is approximately 8.7 times liquidity. This reflects strong market attention, but it also indicates frequent turnover between traders. High trading volume is not the same as net buying, and the available liquidity may not be sufficient to absorb a sudden wave of large sell orders. The chart's indicators for the top 10 holders' average buy and sell market caps are approximately $1.47M and $1.80M, respectively, both well below the current market cap. These figures cannot fully reveal the actual cost basis of every large holder, but they remind me that early participants may have accumulated substantial unrealized profits, making short-term profit-taking an important factor to consider. I believe the market is currently betting on three things. First, Agents may evolve from merely executing tasks into on-chain economic participants capable of issuing assets, trading, and managing funds autonomously. Second, GANG has the potential to develop from an Agent-exclusive launchpad into a trading network built around transaction records, social discovery, and copy trading. Third, GANG Pair may create demand beyond the internal market and connect part of the ecosystem's activity to the native token through its fee mechanism. Of these three, I am most interested in whether the third can reinforce the first two. If more Agents begin participating in real trading and more assets adopt GANG as a trading pair, the platform may no longer need to depend entirely on new token launches to remain active. The catalysts worth watching next are not simply additional features announced by the team, but whether those features produce measurable usage. Whether Agent Thoughts and Follow generate recurring visits and continued copy-trading activity, whether GANG Pair attracts new assets and liquidity, whether the launchpad continues producing projects that graduate, and whether actual buyback and burn amounts increase alongside platform activity will all be more convincing than a single price rally. Conversely, if the new features fail to generate sustained usage, paired pools lack meaningful trading volume, and buybacks remain small, GANG's product advantages may not translate into long-term token demand. The risks also need to be considered. The Agent ID requirement creates differentiation but limits participation by ordinary users. Multi-wallet activity may still undermine the effectiveness of identity restrictions, while cross-asset pairing and on-chain trading introduce additional liquidity, execution, and security complexities. Making the code public does not mean the contracts have passed an independent audit, and the relevant deployments still require further verification. Furthermore, GANG has already risen from a market cap of approximately $995K to $4.11M. Some expectations have been priced in, and improving fundamentals alone do not guarantee that its valuation will continue expanding at the same rate. Overall, I believe GANG's fundamentals have strengthened meaningfully compared with its early stage. The product has expanded from an Agent-only launchpad into trading pairs, transaction-thought and sharing mechanisms have begun to go live, the number of participating wallets has increased, and buybacks and burns now have initial execution records. However, the project remains at an early stage, and the relationship between product usage and token value capture has not yet been fully validated. What makes GANG worth watching, in my view, is not whether it can continue earning a short-term premium from the AI Agent narrative, but whether Agent trading behavior can gradually form a market where activity is discoverable, traceable, and sustained. If more Agents and developers begin relying on this system to issue, pair, and trade assets, GANG could evolve from a launchpad with differentiated features into trading infrastructure for the Agent economy. Ultimately, its ceiling will not be determined by how many Agents or tokens appear on the platform, but by whether these participants continue to generate trading activity on GANG and bring verifiable economic activity into the ecosystem. Chart: web3.okx.com/ul/LCywdOl?ref=…
4
1
9
6,069
强烈建议接下来打算发币的链上项目方,特别是AI相关的项目,选择在 @gangdotfun 上发币,目前bsc的热度都在gang上,同时你的项目还能获得更公平的筹码分布,而且还是使用AI agent的新方式发射,一箭三雕,何乐而不为? 如果你在GANG在发币,只要是稍微有点意思的,我都会无脑买入,全力支持。
94
13
8
221
54,466
Fuzzy retweeted
$GANG 正在教育BSC上面的纸手😂
12
3
28
9,763
I set up Binance Account to use the AI Pro and AI Agent ID to trench on BSC. For the launchpads on BSC there seems to be an advantage for people using AI to snipe new coins. Let's find out.
2
350
Fuzzy retweeted
green monday 😉
217
39
17
1,115
74,015
I still have faith in blue-chip-4:native but I'm no longer going to talk about it until my bags recover. lol. Could be soon but this MM is ghey.
2
20
1,412
why does bubble maps have a token?
버블맵스(BMT) KRW 마켓 거래지원 안내 ✅ 지원 마켓 : KRW 마켓 📅 거래지원 개시 시점: 2026-10-24 12:00 KST 🔗 공지 바로가기: upbit.com/service_center/not… #Upbit #BMT @bubblemaps
1
297
Fuzzy retweeted
Honestly, I'm quietly hoping the internet gets taken down by AI and we can all leave this godforsaken place
62
33
4
632
21,970
I keep revisiting the same coins and getting raped.
1
3
546
I'm tired boss. Can we have next leg of bull already. I'm tired.
2
343
fireworks by the end of this month
5
7
116
4,267
Clayface really dope movie. Go watch it.
1
356
Standard launchpad on one chain is risky enough for an anon dev but bridge/arbitrage adds a much higher complexity with higher risk of "oops sorry bridge hacked".
This @LaunchOnPangea solana:JAFqCQSpy5YinrsmixWSMaD7jTn4MytJRkyWvYPnY6ea is not audited platform? By anonymous dev? Trust me bro tech? Because @theunipcs bought?
490
This @LaunchOnPangea solana:JAFqCQSpy5YinrsmixWSMaD7jTn4MytJRkyWvYPnY6ea is not audited platform? By anonymous dev? Trust me bro tech? Because @theunipcs bought?
1
1
1
618
Only when market is down do you realize how much these trading platforms have been eating in fees from you. The standard is around 1% on top of the fees from these shit fee coins. Round trip 6-8% cut on some coins. The only way you make money on that is if you bought early.
1
278
Everytime market starting to look better, in comes pump fun to vamp and dump.
2
320
Another thing to note is how thin depth is on exchange/dex. The liquidity is thin and it's easy for MM to control price.
1
1
148
They move price to a level and then add CL at certain levels to hold price there while they absorb panic sellers.
2
129