그릿

한일 커플이 늘어나는 이유래

Binance’s SAFU fund and Binance’s holdings include a large amount of assets such as BTC and ETH. We are currently buying, through OTC and on-exchange, all the stolen altcoins in fully matching amounts. We will update everyone again once the purchases are complete. 币安的SAFU基金和币安持有币种包括大量的BTC和ETH等资产，目前正在通过OTC和场内买入完全匹配被盗的所有山寨币来完成POR，购入完成后再次为大家同步信息。

🚨 BREAKING: Hackers are hitting banks in 7 countries at the same time. This is what Covid looked like in week 1. A few countries. Small numbers. Nobody called it a crisis. 1/ South Korea: hackers used a Chinese AI tool to break into at least 7 financial firms. 68,000 people's data stolen. 16 firms breached by mid-October. This week Daishin Securities reported 38,490 customers' data leaked, bank account numbers included. 2/ Latin America: one gang ran AI agents built on Claude, Grok and Kimi against 400+ targets, banks and payment firms included. They stole passwords and got into customer bank accounts. 3/ Italy: a fake WhatsApp from "the CEO" and an AI-cloned voice got Intesa Sanpaolo's private bank to send out €95 million. €36 million is still MISSING, turned into crypto. 4/ India: small lenders lost ₹300 crore (about $31 million) in 2 months. 150 cases. Hackers copied bank logins and sent the money out as fake loans. One firm was hit twice. 5/ Crypto: $351 million drained from Bitget's hot wallets. North Korean hackers are suspected. 6/ Japan: hackers hit GMO Internet's currency trading service and demanded $50 million in crypto. The prime minister promised an emergency anti-cyberattack package. 7/ Australia: the regulator warns AI attacks put more than A$4.5 trillion in retirement savings in the firing line. Government cyber alerts jumped 80% in a year. Now zoom out. AI hacking tools are now easy to get. Smaller firms have weak security. The money moves in minutes. It jumps across banks, through rented accounts, out as cash or crypto. The bosses are often abroad. Covid locked the streets. Nobody is calling this a crisis yet. But the central banks already plan for the day the hackers get in. The G7 agreed to run drills that simulate AI attacks on banks. The ECB reportedly gave eurozone banks 4 months to hand in their defence plans. If your savings sit in a bank, hit follow. I'm tracking where the hackers strike next and how much they take.

I suspect IBIT is already on North Korea’s shortlist. In February 2025, the attackers behind the Bybit hack compromised a Safe{Wallet} developer’s Mac through a malicious project disguised as legitimate Docker-related tooling. They had access for 17 days before the theft, giving them enough time to manipulate the transaction interface used by Bybit’s signers. The signers believed they were approving a legitimate transaction. Instead, they unknowingly authorized the theft of $1.5 billion from a cold wallet. The keys could stay offline while the signers approved a theft through a compromised interface. TRM Labs attributes the recent Binance incident with high confidence to TraderTraitor, the North Korean group also linked to Bybit and the theft of 4,502.9 BTC from DMM Bitcoin. Binance’s preliminary investigation points to a compromised DevOps engineer’s laptop as the entry point. Binance says there’s no evidence that private keys were leaked, while TRM’s analysis suggests the attackers may have gained control of the signing infrastructure. If confirmed, the attackers could have moved funds through a compromised approval process without extracting the keys. Now imagine the same thing happening to IBIT. BlackRock’s IBIT is the world’s largest Bitcoin ETF, holding roughly 815,000 BTC worth around $63 billion. Coinbase remains its active Bitcoin custodian. Although Anchorage Digital has been appointed as an additional custodian, the fund’s latest quarterly filing says there are currently no plans to transfer any Bitcoin there. That’s an extraordinary concentration of Bitcoin under one custodian. Regardless of how large or well-funded that provider is, a critical failure in its security infrastructure could put the entire fund at risk. A $6 billion theft would wipe out roughly 9.5% of IBIT’s assets, equivalent to around $4 per share at current valuations. Binance managed to freeze some stolen stablecoins. Bitcoin has no such mechanism, making stolen BTC far harder to recover. BlackRock doesn’t separately insure the Bitcoin held by the fund. Coinbase has disclosed $320 million in commercial crime insurance coverage, shared across its customers. Its custody agreement also limits liability to $100 million per cold storage address, with any recovery subject to contractual terms, liability determinations, and other conditions. If a major theft occurred and the fund couldn’t recover the Bitcoin or obtain sufficient compensation, the remaining losses would ultimately be borne by IBIT shareholders. Bitcoin ETFs have made owning Bitcoin much more accessible, and there’s real value in that convenience. But as more capital flows into these products, enormous amounts of Bitcoin are also being concentrated among a handful of custodians and the infrastructure they depend on. The larger these pools become, the more attractive they are to attackers. A compromise at any critical point could have consequences far beyond a single institution. And that’s why security has no finish line. Even the most sophisticated cold storage setup still depends on hardware, software, supply chains, signing workflows, and the people operating them. Keeping private keys offline is essential, but it doesn’t eliminate the risks surrounding the transaction approval process. Spread your assets across independent custody setups. Keep your private keys offline. Verify transaction details on a trusted device screen, independently of the computer initiating the transaction. Continuously review your security architecture, and build it around the assumption that some part of your infrastructure will eventually be compromised. There are no silver bullets in security, and no permanent guarantees. Stay vigilant, keep verifying, and never mistake a clean track record for proof that you’re safe. Bunker mode.

Aave Freezes V3 and V4 Markets After Binance Exploiter Deposits $60M USDT and Borrows 19,762 WETH Aave risk service provider LlamaRisk said one wallet linked to the Binance exploiter deposited about 60 million USDT into Aave V3 Ethereum Core and borrowed 19,762 WETH (worth roughly $44.6 million) between 20:58 and 21:01 UTC on October 29, about 40 minutes before the first freeze. The position remains over-collateralized and is the exploiter’s only position on Aave. Aave froze all DAO-operated V3 and V4 markets as a precaution after a potential security incident involving Binance-affiliated wallets, pausing new deposits and borrowing. Users can still withdraw assets and repay existing loans. In total, 175 V3 reserves across 16 networks and 117 V4 reserves across four networks were frozen. Aave said its contracts were unaffected and it aims to lift the freeze as soon as possible.

ZachXBT: Stolen Funds from the $6.3B Binance Exploit and $388M Bitget Exploit Commingled at Same Address, Suspected Same North Korea-Linked Attacker ZachXBT posted that stolen funds from the $6.3 billion Binance exploit and the $388 million Bitget exploit arrived via THORChain and were commingled at the same address. ZachXBT stated that this indicates the same actor is likely behind both incidents. The Bitget exploit had previously been attributed to the North Korea-linked TraiderTraitor, which has overlap with other previous exploits such as Kelp DAO. According to MistTrack, stolen TRX from the Binance incident flowed through Bitget Wallet Swap Bridge into an address beginning with 0xCd68. On-chain tracking shows that this address was previously used by the Phemex hacker.

You can track inflows/outflows from all CEXs on defillama.com/cexs

So, here’s what happened: Binance hot wallets were drained of $5.60B today across Ethereum, Bitcoin and Tron. $200m were transferred few minutes ago, so hack is still ongoing Here is what is on-chain rn: what is frozen vs not, and the addresses to watch. ➮ Totals ✧ $5.60B pulled from Binance hot wallets ✧ 3 chains: Ethereum, Bitcoin, Tron ✧ 67 assets, 63 of them swept out of Binance 14 in a single tx ✧ Attack vector not confirmed at time of writing ➮ Frozen so far: $2.38B ✧ $1.56B USDT frozen by @Tether_to: $1.18B on Ethereum + $379M on Tron ✧ $823M USDC frozen by @circle ✧ Thats ~42% of the haul neutralized within the day ➮ Not frozen: ~$2.6B ✧ 18,270 $BTC ($1.45B) - nobody can freeze this ✧ 197K $ETH ($451M) - same ✧ ~$730M USDT still unfrozen, Tether can still act on it ✧ Rest: $TRX ($234M), $RLUSD ($88.5M), $WBETH ($75M), $XAUT ($50M) and a tail of smaller tokens ➮ Addresses to watch (paste into etherscan / mempool / tronscan) Ethereum, attacker main, holds the frozen USDT + USDC: 0x5227f603c1ee34ce3c06efe6477003bdfccb2f8c Ethereum, 195,460 ETH parked here: 0x8532fa14acaf483729c449b8458aeddb900543d4 Main sweep tx, 63 tokens out of Binance 14: 0x53bd38b816c23e74134786c29a8c18d792777998a3b9326047b583100e88e2f3 Bitcoin, 18,270 BTC received: bc1q0mtc2f5agpkvlq6hhahmfr3hlr55kyfjhl2mnm Tron, 612.7M USDT received, 313M of it frozen: TG5iBMQPrDzJJAUM8GMVBf1hRaJ1wvzsGi Tron, 216M USDT, not frozen: TSUUVjysXV8YqHytSNjfkNXnnB49QDvZpx ➮ Context ✧ Previous record: Bybit, Feb 2025, $1.5B in ETH. This is ~3.8x that ✧ Binance 2019 hack: ~7,000 BTC, ~$40M, covered by SAFU ✧ Binance 2022 BNB bridge: ~$570M, most of it frozen by validators within hours ✧ Moreover, SAFU fund was ~$1B at last disclosure. This hack is 5x+ that, so the coverage question is Binance balance sheet, not SAFU ➮ What matters next 1/ Whether Tether freezes the remaining ~$730M USDT, and whether Ripple does the same with $88.5M RLUSD 2/ First outbound hops from the BTC and ETH addresses, bridges or mixers. Until then $1.9B is just sitting there 3/ Binance withdrawal status and an official statement on how 63 tokens got signed out of Binance 14 4/ Whether this follows Bybit pattern: that money went through THORChain within days, same route would show up fast here Will update as the addresses move.

🚨SUSPECTED BINANCE HACKER WALLET HOLDS OVER $5.7B ON-CHAIN! Arkham tracking for the entity labeled “binance-hacker-1029” shows roughly $5.72 billion in related holdings, including about 1.567B USDT, 18.27K BTC, 385.8K ETH, and 823M USDC. Tether and Circle have frozen the bulk of the stablecoin portion.

Circle is closely tracking reports of a potential exploit involving Binance. In coordination with law enforcement, we have frozen more than 800M USDC associated with the incident and will continue supporting the investigation.