Polkadot ambassador Validator on Polkadot and Kusama (GTSTAKING) ⭐️ DOT : 16YwUZyLdeAoe4KmhivGwuuJpBH1US4qkUtXK2V83MVXUy6x ⭐️ KSM : DxErsWqBducKTqxq7dwXKk2kevAz

France
Joined May 2021
✨ New server for the Polkadot validator ! ✨ I'm upgrading to a more powerful CPU, DDR5 RAM, and more storage. Same provider, same DC, same SLA-premium support. All new information will be updated on the website soon.
4
500
I'm aware of the F 🚩 on my polkadot validator. Sessions key have been rotated. More to come
1
1
47
The problem was caused by an incorrect configuration during the rotating session key process. Once a new session key was put in place, everything returned to normal.
4
GTSTAKING is also currently out of the active set on polkadot New nominations are welcome and will help to be back to the active set (around 500k and 1M $DOT needed I think)
If you hold DOT this is your daily reminder to support your favorite validator. Many of the named validators are about to drop out of the active set.
3
3
9
419
On the token side I'm on the green. I'm holding $DOT and using them only for paying my 2 dedicated server (active and backup) Not here to sell every gain.
1
4
162
It was a looooong era
📢 RESOLVED: Validator elections on Polkadot have resumed, a new era is now active, and era transitions have returned to their normal ~1-day schedule following the governance-approved fix (Ref 1914). No staking rewards were at risk or lost. Because the affected era was longer than usual, validators and nominators earned proportionally larger rewards, which are now ready for distribution. Payouts, nominations, and unbonding have all returned to normal. Thank you to everyone for your patience while the issue was resolved. We’ll publish a full postmortem at the beginning of next week with more detail on the root cause and the steps taken to address it.
15
1,432
GTSTAKING retweeted
Two new referenda on Polkadot's OpenGov, #1909 and #1910, propose a series of staking parameter updates designed to optimize the network security model while reducing overall security costs. Together, these proposals aim to strengthen validator incentives, enable better user experience and reduce overall risk for the nominators with a 48-hour unbonding period. Ref #1909 builds on the previously approved 10,000 DOT minimum validator self-stake requirement. It introduces rewards for validator self-stake, sets validator commission to 0%, and enables permissionless chilling of under-bonded validators. Referendum #1910 specifies changes for nominators. It removes nominator slashing and reduces the unbonding period from approximately 28 days to two days for nominators. These changes will be fully activated upon a successful governance vote and once the validator set has fully adapted to the new staking requirements. The proposals seek to rebalance staking responsibilities between validators and nominators by increasing incentives for validator self-stake while simplifying participation for nominators.
38
112
10
429
94,263
Overview of the polkadot validator performance from the last 32 eras : 🟢 29 A+ eras 🩵 3 A eras
1
1
2
90
Also : following the increase in the minimum commission from 0 to 10%, the validator ID will be updated. On-chain and on the website.
2
40
⚠️ Reminder for DOT nominators With the new issuance curve now live, staking yields have dropped noticeably. • Previously: around 10% APY • Now: roughly 5–6% APY (depending on validator commission and stake distribution) This change comes after Polkadot’s tokenomics reset, which reduced annual DOT issuance to about 55 million DOT. However, this is before another major change takes effect. The DAP upgrade, which will decouple validator and nominator rewards, has not been implemented yet. Once it is live, nominator rewards will come directly from allocations within the DAP, rather than the current staking reward structure. How exactly those rewards will be distributed and what the final yield will look like is still unclear. Originally, the idea was to establish an economics fellowship via OpenGov to periodically adjust these parameters. Whether the @Web3foundation economists will propose the first set of parameters remains to be seen. A simpler way to think about it might be this: DAP could function somewhat like a “bank” for DOT. You lock your DOT in a DAP allocation pool, and in return receive yield. What that yield will be is still unknown, it could be 5%, 10%, or even higher. Higher yields would likely encourage more DOT to be locked, while lower yields could lead to more DOT circulating in the market. For now, this is something the community will need to watch closely as the details evolve.
2
16
2
74
6,910
10k ready ! ✅ Check yours nominations on : dakk.github.io/polkapredict/… Dashboard by @dagide
9
385
Your staked $DOT can no longer be slashed. Polkadot is removing slashing for nominators entirely. Validators must now hold 10,000 DOT in self-stake - they carry the accountability. What's changing and when ↓ polkadot.cloud/blog/en/polka… #Polkadot
3
16
1
110
8,956
Mid to Late March 2026 validator minimum self-stake will be 10k DOT I have currently 4,248 DOT bonded. And next week I would at 10k DOT bonded. Unstaking as been initiated last month on others wallets. So GTSTAKING will stil in the active set on Polkadot ! parity.io/blog/refining-polk…
7
32
1,253
This January 👇 - One of our cloud providers scheduled network maintenance ➡️ we switched to the backup validator - System and security update with restart of the primary validator server (Amsterdam) - Crunch-Payout updated to the latest version following issues encountered yesterday
1
91
GTSTAKING retweeted
Staking rewards on Polkadot follow a ~24-hour cycle called an "Era," usually split between ~22K nominators. Yesterday, in Era #2035, an issue with an off-chain election tool limited the nominator set to just 3K, leading to higher individual payouts for those included. The issue is now resolved, and the set has returned to its regular ~22K nominators.
28
34
280
25,452
GTSTAKING retweeted
📊 Did you know? Subscan now tracks each validator’s Commission History — so you can review how their rates changed over time before nominating. More transparency. Smarter staking decisions. Check it out @Polkadot 👉 polkadot.subscan.io/validato…
2
11
846
GTSTAKING retweeted
Reimbursement for the missed staking rewards on @Polkadot is in the works. A concrete plan of action will be announced soon. – at Baar, Schweiz
2
12
4
57
5,856
Following the Migration to Asset Hub : "While copying configs from RC to AH, the fixed total issuance noted in Referendum 1139 was misplaced with sth else. This PR fixes this. Note to all validators and stakers: Until this fix is deployed, the staking rewards are expected to be about 60% less than before." github.com/polkadot-fellows/…
1
1
77