Anthony Ray Hinton spent almost thirty years on death row because his lawyer thought he could only afford a bad expert witness. Not because the evidence was strong. Because the money wasn't there, and the system let that decide the outcome instead of the truth. I think about how quietly that same logic could creep into agent commerce. An AI agent flags another agent's claim as fraudulent, wrongly, and the counterparty has no realistic way to challenge it because mounting a dispute costs more than most individual transactions are even worth. The agent that made the mistake never faces consequences. The one who was wronged just absorbs it, the same way Hinton absorbed three decades because nobody with money was willing to look closer sooner. Justice has always worked best for whoever could pay for it. Soon agents will be striking millions of deals a day, and if even a fraction go wrong the way Hinton's case went wrong, we are building an entire economy on the same broken assumption, that being right only matters if you can afford to prove it. @GenLayer settles disputes through independent AI validators reaching a verdict together, in minutes, at a fraction of what any court costs. If an agent wrongly accused you of something and proving your innocence cost more than the accusation itself, would you still fight it? #JusticeNeedsAnUpgrade