Reciprocity partaker. Karma enjoyer. Pikachu face facilitator. 😎 I derive satisfaction from getting blocked mid-debate as the femcel angrily waves her 🏳️
Joined June 2018
- Tweets4.7K
- Following850
- Followers984
- Likes7.7K
Pinned Tweet
I want to leave aside whatever political differences I have with this woman, and just strictly focus on what she's doing in this specific post:
-she (Persian Jewess) learns that Bill Ackmans company allegedly is getting falsely accused by a woman
-she then immediately makes it about her own supposed victimhood, instead of commenting mostly or entirely about the merits (or lack thereof) of the woman's accusations against Bills company. This is main character syndrome on steroids (or rather, on estroturbo)
-she also conveniently ignores why it's morally righteous for a merit based (as opposed to equity based) organization to lay off those pregnant employees: because they fail to do equal labor & productivity as their male (obviously non pregnant) employees, due to being out of commission for at least multiple months. In other words, feminists like her demand equal pay/benefits for LESSER work (in either quantity or commitment or efficiency or creativity). Sound familiar? This is the same anti equality arguments pushed by feminist athletes who insist on equal sponsorships, while getting massively Pikachu faced by Trans women (ie men) who destroy the athletic performance of bio women
-finally, she ends her post by saying that the true victims of false accusations are the legit female accusers who have yet to come out. This is bullshit. The actual victims of false accusations, are the falsely accused (usually men). The future accusers are hypothetical victims: not real yet, if ever.
This is an incredible sociopathic ability to twist an (alleged) injustice against a man into a victim-larping "main character syndrome" exhibited by countless Femcels - and yes that includes so called conservative women.
PS: I keep using the word allegedly, to leave open the possiblity that maybe Bills company is guilty of what he's being accused. You see, unlike the BAW movement, I don't automatically believe all women, until we see receipts or historical patterns.
When I was starting out in my career, I worked at an international firm headquartered in NYC.
There were six people in my specialty group. Three male partners and three female associates. I was the most junior.
The most senior associate was passed over for partner after disclosing she was pregnant with her second child. She had been with the firm for seven years. She silently had her baby, took her leave, and quit within months of returning to the office.
The mid-level associate was fired within two months of returning from maternity leave. The partners refused to staff her on deals so they could claim she had low billable hours. They knew she was the breadwinner for her family, so to avoid a wrongful termination lawsuit, they offered her three months severance and agreed not to disclose the termination to future employers in exchange for a waiver of claims.
Then I got pregnant.
By then, our group had shrunk to four people: three male partners and me as the only associate.
And right on schedule, when my chance for promotion came, I was passed over too.
Like the two women before me, I could not risk being blacklisted by suing. So I quietly left, found another job, and kept what happened to myself.
Workplace discrimination is real. It is devastating. And it happens far more often than people want to admit.
That is exactly why false accusations are so damaging.
When predatory people like @BillAckman’s “Ronda” weaponize harassment claims for attention, leverage, or a payday, they make it even harder for women with legitimate experiences to speak up.
So Bill, on this one, I’m with you. Thank you for calling out this behavior for what it is.
Once again, redpill observations are proven over and over again.
Here's a short clip summarizing preselection, which leads to polygyny.
Remember:
She'd rather share an alpha, than be exclusive with a beta incel (aka male feminist).
She'd rather mate with her superior, than with her equal.
Gender Accelerationist retweeted
You can cancel an election and ban the winner from running (Romania), you can ban your opponents from ever running again (Hungary), you can threaten to ban the main opposition party and subject it to relentless investigations by the secret police (Germany), you can threaten a ban on the leading presidential candidate and make them wear an ankle monitor (France), every member of your circle can be investigated for corruption (Spain), you can try and cancel local elections because you will lose them (Britain), and you can storm the constitutional court with riot police because you want to control it (Poland).
You can just do all these things. The secret is you just have to be on the right side of the European Commission.
Gender Accelerationist retweeted
This guy is police commissioner and wants men/boys arrested for watching "manosphere" videos and "misogyny". Hey John, do you not believe in equality? Why ZERO focus on misandry? If a woman says she hates men, will she be arrested? Much like how you want to arrest men if they say that about women?
The manosphere and misogyny should be tackled in many ways.
This proposal to adopt a public health approach is interesting and should be explored nationally and locally.
theguardian.com/society/2026…
... And this is what I mean when I say that even the Right-wing spaces have undergone Femshittification:
You have "anti-woke" female influencers (like this Rikki chick) who are just feminists wearing a conservative mask, pushing the same copium, sourced from bunk pseudo-scientific data
New data shows young men are souring on the manosphere — and losing faith in just about everything nypost.visitlink.me/_LKIx5
So....The 🍇 hoaxers Kristin Knouse, and Sangheeta Bhatia (and their many fangirls) also derailed Sabatini's cancer research, thereby indirectly unaliving countless cancer patients.
The victim-larping male-subsidized anti-science Abortionists keep harming humanity, yet again.
The loss extended far beyond Dr. Sabatini. The whole country suffers when institutions entrusted with advancing knowledge reward the behavior of Sangeeta Bhatia.
When I first became a tenure-track professor, I was quickly disillusioned by how little interest so many of my colleagues seemed to have in science. It shocked me because it made no sense. My love of science was why I took the job. I accepted much less pay and much longer hours because it gave me the chance to devote myself to something I loved.
Many colleagues seemed far more interested in chasing prestige and stature within the university. I had assumed that people who made those sacrifices shared my priorities. Finding out otherwise was a profound disappointment.
You can see those priorities on display in Sangeeta Bhatia’s messages. In the exchanges, you can see celebration of David’s destruction and no concern for the science and knowledge being lost. He was a scientist with far greater scientific accomplishments than hers. Yet, Bhatia was someone directing a cancer research center at MIT and treated as an authority on advancing cancer research.
Dr. Sabatini’s work laid the foundations for a major field of drug development, including cancer therapies. Dismantling his laboratory meant interrupting the work of someone whose discoveries had already opened enormous scientific and therapeutic possibilities. None of that concern is visible in these exchanges.
This is what happens when universities reward bureaucratic hacks who promote their personal causes, work their way into leadership, and use institutional authority to pursue those causes while the science suffers. Her titles remain, even as the institution decays.
People involved in removing Dr. Sabatini retained their positions of stature or advanced. His laboratory was dismantled. Years of work were interrupted, scientific were lost, the careers of the poeple he was mentoring were disrupted and the people celebrating kept their authority.
Meanwhile, MIT puts on a show claiming merit is its main focus while the place rots behind the veneer of excellence it displays to the public.
in this victim-larping video, notice how she never takes accountability for her gender's own-goaling:
She never criticizes the sexual revolution,
nor the feminist women who imposed it on the rest of us normies.
And see how she's trying to depict her boyfriend as controlling in this other clip:
teapawt.org/kaworu0x/status/211339…
Riley Reid says porn cost her her ENTIRE FAMILY - her mom used her for MONEY, and her own DAD told her: "I don't want to be seen in public with you." 💔
"I've lost my whole family."
"A lot of times when people ask me if they should do porn, I tell them no."
"I started to feel like my mom was using me so that she could live a more luxurious lifestyle."
"I don't have a mom anymore. I don't talk to her. I miss having a mom."
"I'm not allowed to go visit my dad anymore because my stepmom doesn't like that I do porn."
"Can we like go get coffee and like get breakfast and he's like, I don't want to be seen in public with you."
"And that just fucking hurt so bad."
Why do incels keep saying dumb crap like this?
1. Ethan Klein and Tamara Joseph are both consenting adults, both knew what they were doing.
2. We got solid evidence that Tamara pursued Ethan, long before she was ever hired
3. There is zero evidence Tamara was under coercion or worse
Let's stop white knighting any man or woman, and be honest of their culpability
body count will stop mattering to men, as soon as men's height/income/social proof/homeowner status stop mattering to women.
Remember:
in mammals, it is usually the FEMALE gender which chooses the mate, which therefore drives sexual dimorphism and therefore , evolutionary preferences in mating.
Of course, the same Abortionist gender which gave us "gender is a patriarchal construct" and "fetus is not human" is the more anti-science gender.
Yet another groypette, Morgan Ariel, is getting triggered that Andrew Wilson is accurately predicting the future.
Thanks to AI, biotech, and medicinal breakthroughs, In only a few decades, the final challenge of exo-natalism, aka artificial human births (involving zero participation of any human female) will be solved.
And when that happens, women will be seen as literally obsolete by men in every possible way.
Men will finally be free.
It's coming sooner than we think.
Your lives would suck without us.
Women inspire men to be great.
You think you lack direction and purpose now but remove women and men will devolve into nothingness.
No one has more purpose and drive to conquer the world than a man with a family to provide for.
Women are created in the image of God and will always have value despite what wounded individuals say online.
Esta Valentina me parece enferma....o auto propagandista
No tenés pasatiempos o que??
teapawt.org/ValentinaForUSA/status…
Gender Accelerationist retweeted
🚨 BOMBSHELL COURT EVIDENCE EXPOSES EXPLOSIVE PRIVATE MESSAGES REVEALING COORDINATION BETWEEN KRISTIN KNOUSE AND MIT PROFESSOR SANGEETA BHATIA IN THE DAVID M. SABATINI ORDEAL.
🔱 NEW REVELATION — Court evidence exposes how Knouse and Bhatia privately celebrated Sabatini’s removal, discussed the potential destruction of his professional career, and anticipated the revocation of his @MIT tenure.
An 80-message exchange between Kristin Knouse and MIT Professor Sangeeta Bhatia, dated August 20–21, 2021, reveals their private reactions immediately following Whitehead Institute and HHMI's severance of ties with Professor @DMSabatini.
The communications contain statements that deserve serious public examination.
🔴 1. “YOU DID IT” — “AND HE’S OUT.”
On August 20, 2021, Bhatia congratulated Knouse:
🔴 “YOU DID IT. You crossed the finish line. It's out in the open. And you're not out in the open. And you're on the faculty. And he's out.”
Knouse responded:
🔴 “You connecting me to Nancy [Hopkins]was the turning point. I will never forget that walk in Lexington.”
🔴 2. “THIS WAS THE OUTCOME I DREAMED OF.”
The following morning, as news coverage spread, Knouse discussed the possibility of Sabatini losing his MIT tenure:
🔴 “Hard to imagine MIT will be left with any choice other than to revoke tenure.”
Bhatia responded:
🔴 “You're right about tenure”
She subsequently wrote:
🔴 “This was the outcome I dreamed of but NEVER certain I would get it.”
Knouse also described her assessment of Whitehead's handling of the matter:
🔴 “And as skeptical as I was of Whitehead's end game, in the end I think the overall process was perfectly executed.”
Bhatia expressed her approval of Whitehead Institute Director Ruth Lehmann:
🔴 “I'm proud of Ruth [Lehmann]”
These exchanges occurred months before MIT's April 2022 tenure-revocation recommendation.
🔴 3. THE PROFESSIONAL CONSEQUENCES — BEYOND WHITEHEAD.
The participants also discussed Sabatini's corporate affiliations and prospects for future employment.
Knouse wrote:
🔴 “I know of one company already speaking with lawyers to remove him on grounds of morality clause.”
She subsequently stated:
🔴 “Hard to imagine how he can be gainfully employed anywhere after the past 24 hours ...”
These were not merely discussions about an institutional investigation. They extended to the potential consequences for Sabatini's career, tenure, corporate affiliations, and future livelihood.
🔴 4. THE DIVERSITY SURVEY AND PROTECTION FROM PUBLIC IDENTIFICATION.
In another particularly consequential exchange, Bhatia wrote:
🔴 “Also the dei survey and subsequent investigation really protects you, which I love. There is not even a scent of whistleblower in all the press.”
This statement takes on particular significance alongside the previously disclosed communications in which Knouse and Nora Kory discussed using Whitehead's diversity survey to conceal an investigation already under consideration (📑 see the original court evidence in the first comment below).
🔴 5. “WE DRANK CHAMPAGNE” — CELEBRATING AS THE NEWS SPREAD.
Perhaps the most striking exchange appears on KK011419.
On August 21, 2021, Knouse declared:
🔴 “I KNOW! Young people took down a relatively young king. Progress, progress, progress.”
Knouse also wrote:
🔴 “Two other women who came forward and I drank champagne while watching the Tweets and articles roll in last night. It felt like campaign headquarters after an election victory. Really special.”
Bhatia responded:
🔴 “That's awesome.”
These exchanges reinforce the serious concerns about coordination and conflicts of interest raised by our previous disclosures. Their significance must be assessed alongside the full documentary record and the subsequent jury verdict.
The scientific community deserves full accountability for any misconduct established by the evidence, including the roles of individuals who participated in or improperly influenced the institutional processes that subjected Professor Sabatini to a devastating ordeal and profoundly damaged his career.
📑 REVIEW THE ORIGINAL COURT EVIDENCE BELOW.
🔱 ScienceGuardians™ Legal and Investigative Team
MORE COURT EVIDENCE. MORE REVELATIONS. STAY TUNED. ⚠️
@SciGuardians 🔱
🔱 Part 5 — Joint Appendix JA004741: Court evidence reveals reported support and pressure involving senior MIT faculty
🚨 Court documents reveal that Kristin Knouse described support from influential MIT faculty members during the proceedings concerning Professor David M. Sabatini.
⚠️ In messages dated 13 October 2021, Knouse identified support attributed to senior MIT figures and described their willingness to approach MIT President Rafael Reif to influence the institutional outcome.
These communications document efforts to mobilize influential individuals within MIT during Sabatini's tenure-review proceedings.
📑 THE ORIGINAL COURT EVIDENCE IS PRESENTED BELOW.
Gender Accelerationist retweeted
Dave Foley was ordered to pay his ex-wife $17,700 a month in child support. That was five times what he actually earned.
If he set foot in Canada, he would be arrested at the border.
When he asked the judge how he’d feed his daughter from his second marriage, he says the court’s answer was simple: “They can rot in hell.”
In 1997, Foley was starring on NBC’s NewsRadio and making about $1 million a year. That year, he separated from his first wife, Tabatha Southey.
An Ontario judge set his payments at $17,700 a month, or $212,400 a year after taxes, based on his sitcom salary.
Two years later, NBC canceled the show. His income dropped by nearly 80%.
He went back to court to lower the payments. The judge said no. The court ruled he had made $1 million once, so he should keep paying like he still did.
His ex-wife lived in a $2.5 million house on a park in Toronto. Foley rented a small loft in downtown LA.
By 2011, he owed more than $500,000 in back payments. Ontario threatened to pull his passport and issued a warrant for his arrest if he came home.
In the video below, Foley explains the math: “I’m paying about five times my income every month in child support, based on a show that hasn’t been on for 12 years.”
He couldn’t work in Canada again until he landed a new sitcom in 2014 and had his paychecks garnished at the source.
The case for the court: a parent shouldn’t get to slash support just because their career slows down.
The case for Dave: locking a canceled actor into 1990s sitcom money under threat of prison is extortion.
Should child support be tied to what you earn today, or the best year you ever had?
Gender Accelerationist retweeted
So all of the women believe Ephesians 5 from Holy Scripture is “weaponized” in terms of submitting.
Good luck men. You have the obligations of a man to lead, provide, protect, lead your household to heaven, but she has no obligation to submit unless she feels like you’re worthy of submission.
Feminism is so deeply weaponized and capitulated to in all of Christianity at this point that I don’t know how to fix it.
Almost no priests, pastors or organizations will stand up to a woman.
Their obligations are based on how they feel. Like a buffet when it comes to obeying Christ and Holy Scripture.
Welcome to Christian dating gentlemen!
Gender Accelerationist retweeted
Happened to meToo, but as a *junior* *untenured* *adjunct professor at UT Dallas in 2016 (before I later got tenured). I didnt have the wealth, prestige & position that @DMSabatini did at MIT. Still fought back & won.
Here is the audio recording of Title IX telling me the student perpetrator (Melissa Vilaga) admitted she lied about the whole thing of false allegations... and asking me to let her back into my Neuroscience class(!) I said heck no, not allowed. Receipts below. youtu.be/XZencBlBMoM
for those thinking that this type of gross feminist victim-larp is new....
(This famous photo predates AI by many years):
25 women and girls.
That’s how many were killed 𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙮 𝙙𝙖𝙮 in conflict zones in 2025.
#Peace must mean safety for women and girls.
🔗 More on the @UN Secretary-General's report on #WomenPeaceSecurity: unwomen.org/en/news-stories/…
#ForAllWomenAndGirls
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
According to the same UN report, women and girls accounted for one in four of over 37,000 civilian deaths in 2025. Men and boys were the remaining three-quarters. The report notes men are still likelier to be killed.
unwomen.org/en/articles/fa…
Playboy founder Hugh Hefner...A perv?
That's like saying that his wife Crystal was a glorified (and willing) prostitute.
EVERYONE knew that, duh.
But the other extreme stuff she alleges?
Until she shows us real proof, Crystal is just another Lucy Craig or mattress girl: 🍇 hoaxing for validation.
Never forget why Crystal salivated after Hugh Hefner:
Hugh Hefner’s widow, Crystal, accuses late Playboy founder of rape, incest as she details horrific sex acts trib.al/bKZyMIz
Gender Accelerationist retweeted
Asian WH👩🏻TE woman from TikTok says that the Oxford study slur implying Asian women only like WH🧔🏼♂️TE men is a figment of incel Asian men’s imagination and WH🧔🏼♂️TE supremacy. Thoughts ⁉️👑
Gender Accelerationist retweeted
Lindsay Clancy-obsessed mom Corie Walsh 'fully' supported by family who know 'psychosis' also to blame for her killing son: lawyer trib.al/pH2ULwE
Gender Accelerationist retweeted
Women would rather share a top tier guy than “settle” for a guy in their actual league. Hypergamy clown world 🤡🌎
what neither "anti-woke" NY Post nor Legacy feminist Martina will admit:
This is a civil war (one of many) amongst feminist women (mostly).
Will Legacy feminists ever admit their gender's primary culpability?
Or will they help outsourcing their accountability to the other, male gender?
