I voluntarily omitted mechanisms that totally prevent gamification of the metric but they are easy to discover if you think in term of incentives and counter forces.
One should not hope to come close to the upper bound, it is most useful when used to as a comparison tool for rates or values.
14
The rate at which any physical system can generate or extract new information is fundamentally limited by how fast quantum states can evolve into distinguishable (orthogonal) configurations under energy and time constraints.
This leads to a clean efficiency metric:
η = ∆surprise / ∆(E × t) ≤ 4 / h(bits per joule-second)
It bridges Shannon surprisal with the Margolus–Levitin quantum speed limit.
I propose this as a potential non-gameable metric for measuring real intelligence in AI systems.
Thoughts?
1
2
37
Transfer from ChatGPT to Claude in one Simple copy paste
Instructions:
claude.ai/public/artifacts/4…
26
CORE retweeted
tweets i'd like to nail to my forehead:
Replying to @nosilverv
good graph, judge on process not outcome, especially on lagging measures, especially if you make early trade-offs on speed for building strong foundational understanding
Not interested, Mute, and Block are now a single click away
X hides the one button that could save your timeline,
I exposed it
extension: github.com/GildedSignal/X-no…
X hides the one button that could save your timeline,
I exposed it
extension: github.com/GildedSignal/X-no…
Life, Death, ReBirth.
Replying to @Gilded_Signal @shedrinkswater
This is a live dissection,
performed without anaesthetic,
on the one subject,
you are not allowed to kill:
yourself.
Bear with me
131
Sighing,
I pocketed the now bitter,
caramel sweet fruit from the bowl
with the same palm she betrayed,
its pit rattling,
like the hollow echo of her laugh,
on our final,
unshared untasted uncircled date.
98



















