Yes, this will be streamed live and you should be able to watch it afterwards.
parliamentlive.tv/Guide
A few of us outside Winchester Crown Court this morning to show support for Joanne Young.
#ShameMustChangeSides
#ADruggedWomanNeverConsents
Has there been a year-long enquiry looking into the clinic that prescribed you immunosuppressant for eczema? Did it find that dozens of children were put at risk?
No? Then stop bringing up personal info that nobody is interested in and that has nothing to do with this case.
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c932…
"effective diagnosis"
Have you even read about the case we're discussing on this thread? 🤦
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c932…
Most kids grow out of gender dysphoria. There is absolutely no way to tell whether a young teenager will persist in their gender dysphoric feelings as they go through puberty.
You'd prefer for all kids to potentially lose their fertility and sexual function because of the minority who, like you, persist.
Selfish bastard.
Jesus, I think we can all see why you only have 1 follower now, William 🤦
"Transsexual people dont want to have blood-related kids due to dysphoria, they dont want to have sex like their birth sex (which is why they get SRS)"
Young teenagers are in no position to decide whether they may want kids later in life.
And youngsters who have never experienced an orgasm are in no position to decide whether they care about potential loss of sexual function.
And MOST trans people do not get SRS!
Presumably you've not heard of detransitioners?
Or trans people changing their minds about having kids as they get older?
Or trans men having babies?
Or the middle-aged men (who "always knew" they were 'trans' but didn't transition until after they'd had kids).
Or Marci Bowers' statement re. kids never being able to experience orgasm?
Or the WPATH files?
theguardian.com/commentisfre…
static1.squarespace.com/stat…
How can you be so ignorant? Why do you think the doctor at WellBN has been suspended and these kind of drugs cannot be legally prescribed to young teenagers in the UK?
accpjournals.onlinelibrary.w…
There are a lot of questions here and things about the story I would question. But it's not true to say the campaign only launched this week. It was captured by Wayback Machine on May 21 (so was probably online before then).
It's obviously being heavily promoted now by TRAs as a result of the new guidance being published.
They do advise to have necessary medical supplies. Whether you can get your doctor to prescribe extra so you have a stock is a different matter. I can see it will be a big worry for some.
"Every trans person knows not to tell the government you're trans"
LOL! Sure.
That's why Stonewall campaigned for two decades to get the gender identity question included, and published a statement explicitly urging: "Now we need to make sure all lesbian, gay, bi and trans people in England and Wales feel confident and supported to fill in the Census on 21 March."
That's why LGBT organisations heavily promoted the census using the hashtag #ProudToBeCounted and Stonewall hailed it as a "historic step".
That's why Stonewall said the census results were "in line with what we expected to see for the trans and non-binary population in England and Wales, based on comparable data from Canada"
But feel free to share your reliable data showing "nearly 700K trans people" in England and Wales, including sample sizes, questions, definitions and breakdown by gender identity.
And 151 out of 245 (62%) in 2024.
questions-statements.parliam…
yahoo.com/news/almost-two-th…
Yes, "urgent" chemo would be the more correct clinical terminology. But that doesn't negate the point re timing (IF we were talking about something like Burkitt).
Having said that, I'll say again - we don't know Joelle's specific diagnosis or why treatment decisions were made so all of this is speculation and for any potential inquest to investigate.
I have not 'condemned' anyone and have advised throughout to leave this to an inquest/investigation.
2nd November, not 4th November.
Yes, four weeks since admission....... as I said.
Have you lost the ability to read, Barry?
Joelle Plow case.
Facts vs Theories
We know that this sad case is being used as propaganda by the TRAs. However, I am also seeing multiple people on the "GC" side making unsubstantiated claims about this.
I have now seen numerous posts claiming as fact that "He died because he had terminal cancer that was beyond treatment" , "He had terminal Stage 4 lymphoma and was being given palliative care."
They have no evidence on which to make these claims.
Unless they, and TransLegal, are knowingly lying, the facts re. Joelle's treatment as they set out (and this is ALL we have to go on) are:
- He was admitted to hospital on 3rd/4th October 2023.
- There is no evidence that the hospital diagnosed him with 'terminal cancer'; it is claimed that they told him that "emergency chemo could not start until she was in the right ward and there was not a bed"
- He had an aggressive form of lymphoma which is highly responsive to treatment but treatment needs to commence immediately
- Emergency chemo DID go ahead, after 16 days of waiting in a private room
- He died a couple of weeks after this (on November 2nd), four weeks after being admitted (not 16 days after being admitted as is being claimed).
The fact that he died following the chemo does not mean that his cancer was 'terminal' at diagnosis. The NHS defines a terminal illness in terms of a condition that cannot be cured and will lead to death; it does not define it retrospectively as any cancer from which someone dies.
Without evidence of the actual diagnosis, treatment regimen and clinical prognosis, everything is pure speculation. From both sides.
*The claim that this case was due to new NHS guidance is a clear lie. It happened in 2023.
*The claims that this was all due to transphobia are subjective.
*Whether or not there was medical negligence re. his treatment and whether or not the delay in treatment could have saved his life is a matter for a coroner/inquest/investigation.
Seriously? Do I have to repeat this AGAIN?!
You posted a screenshot of a CN which stated AS A FACT that this person DID HAVE stage 4 lymphoma and that this was terminal and chemo was 'unlikely to be curative.
I informed (I didn't 'have a go at' at) you that this was inaccurate and NOBODY KNOWS what stage this patient was at but IF it was lymphoma, this - as a disease - IS curable. I made no statement at all about having actual knowledge of this patient's condition. That was made clear in my reply.
If, after all this, you cannot understand the difference between these two things, I can't help you any further.
Don't bother coming back at me.
I've wasted enough time on you.
