I wrote a high-level overview of where flakes sit in the @nixos_org ecosystem, how they're useful, and why parts of the nix community are split about them for LWN: lwn.net/SubscriberLink/10942…

I don't think it's whaddaboutism that was my literal response You can easily tune bun btw to make it use less ram in those harnesses you're wrapping btw, which you should probably look into, the default settings are horrible. Whaddaboutism would be me saying I think it's a product mistake to not be willing to engage with those concerns, because even if you think they're not your responsibility, you'd be surprised how much you can fix them. And like, look, you keep insulting people all the time. Yes that is also toxic.you make everything super personal. I was genuinely just wisecracking and you're turning it into a much bigger thing than it was. It's still funny to me that you say we shouldn't discuss harnesses and then went on to spend a day discussing them. Also funny to me that you made whether or not I understand harnesses pivotal, somehow. I've literally trained large language models and built harnesses to do so. I think I know what it is. I'm also smart enough to understand that just because you've decided you want to differentiate yourself from other products by inventing a new product category e.g. without tool calls or that wraps a bunch of harnesses, that thinking that makes it less relevant to criticism you for downplaying caring about harnesses is obviously avoiding the actual point. Your product should be obsessed with harnesses, evidently as you're staying yourself, your constraints and criticisms you're guessing is because you don't care enough about them. You've placed yourself somewhere in the stack where you feel okay not fixing a problem that seems to bother your users, if you had the humitly to engage with people without calling them stupid, you'd easily find it was fixable. Unironically, ask your agents you could go far with that. And if you didn't just call everyone you disagree with stupid you'd get more feedback like that. But instead youre shelted by a large echo chamber audience that somehow validates your behavior, paired with a platform that gives you incentives to stoke any fire you see. My biggest criticism against you would be that's you're so constantly reliant on this kind of engagement bait because you're too lazy, or too scared to engage with something substantial. You can clearly not just let something go. Fine. Whatever. There isn't even a wincondition for me here. You're so busy calling me a bitch, stupid, saying all these random ad hoc stuff, but look man you're just not a serious person, your stuff isn't that important, you're someone that says stupid things for views. You're a jester that has conflated an audience for relevance. And you shouldn't be so defensive when you get pushback from your statements, when they're so often made to be inflammatory and start problems. If that's your marketing strategy fine whatever, you're not alone in that. But to thinkt that makes everyone else stupid... Whatever man. You're not a real person. Go do some adreads or whatever. Fucking hell.

AAAAWWOOOOOOOGAAAAAAAAA A high severity vulnerability in "the most widely deployed DNS software on the internet" just dropped kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2026-943…

not to pile on but called it

This house don't run on hope

In case you're curious why VNDB never went down today, it's because it's built on Perl, even more of an oldhead language than PHP. And yet it's doing just fine!

A Turkish power plant's production dashboard is open over VNC: 71,854 MWh lifetime, units at 3,031 kW, net sales 1,537 kW live. port:5900 has_screenshot:true -tag:honeypot #shodansafari