Maybe this is it.

⛳
Joined September 2009
Ormai il paese è completamente diviso in due, da una parte la sinistra propal pro islam pro centri sociali pro sta gran ceppa di minchia, dall'altra gli italiani
1
1
16
3,633
Ettore Fieramosca retweeted
Da meno 2,2 milioni a più 4,4 milioni in tre settimane, con un’espansione del voto quasi tre volte superiore a quella dell’avversario e con tutti i partiti non arrivati al ballottaggio che hanno appoggiato Bolsonaro. In pratica mancherebbero 11 milioni di voti "teorici". È la prima volta che succede nella storia. Merito dell'efficacissima campagna elettorale di Lula.
38
93
1
384
5,580
Ettore Fieramosca retweeted
Un altro blitz della Polizia di Stato al Quarticciolo, nel quadrante est della Capitale: 11 gli arresti, di cui 9 per reati in materia di droga, messi a segno nel corso di distinti interventi tra via Ostuni, via Palmiro Togliatti e via Molfetta. Sequestrata anche una pistola semiautomatica Glock calibro 9x21, con caricatore inserito e pronta all'uso, risultata rubata, e 93 cartucce. La pressione degli agenti sulle piazze di spaccio nel quartiere continuerà fino al loro completo smantellamento.
5
4
66
674
Si apoyas a Palestina y sigues gritando «genocidio» después de ver este video, no hay forma de arreglar tu nivel de idiotez y odio.
2
67
193
3,279
Aunque no queramos ser conspiranóicos, tenemos esencialmente dos opciones: -Tomar nota de lo de Brasil y preparar un plan b para evitar que pasen "cosas raras" a última hora el 29N que inviertan una tendencia clarísima de resultados. -Creer que todo irá bien porque patatas.
16
Ettore Fieramosca retweeted
How come Elon Musk is the only one seriously talking about all these young people dying in the trenches for no reason and begging for this war to stop? Innocent young Ukrainians and Russian conscripts are getting blown apart by drones, losing their lives And then you look at Europe. What do you only keep hearing from so many European leaders? More weapons, more ammunition, more military support. “We cannot let Russia win” You almost never hear them seriously talking about how to bring peace and end this war for good Why the hell aren't those same leaders putting that much energy into figuring out how to stop this meat grinder? What are these leaders actually doing to stop young people from dying every single day? What are they doing to end this endless slaughter? Why aren't they putting the same urgency into finding a way to end this war instead of constantly talking about sending more weapons and how they should continue this war forever? These are human beings. They have parents, families, loved ones, and entire lives ahead of them. And they're dying in trenches because of decisions made by people who will never have to experience what those young soldiers are going through And that includes the poor Russian conscripts who have no choice but to fight. They're human beings too. Their lives matter too How many more young people need to die before stopping this war becomes just as important as deciding who wins it? Why does it take Elon Musk to keep reminding people about the human lives being destroyed by this war? Seriously, where the hell is the urgency to stop all this killing? everyone who wants to continue this war is pure evil
Replying to @skscartoon
The endless slaughter of Ukrainian and Russians must stop. We should some sympathy for the poor Russian conscripts too. Those kids have no choice but to fight and die in drone strikes.
1,006
986
112
5,869
3,415,837
Ettore Fieramosca retweeted
Deberíais empezar por Julio Iglesias.
Hola @ppopular. En @eldiarioes también nos gustaría entrevistar a Alberto Núñez Feijóo. La llevamos pidiendo desde que llegó a la presidencia del PP. Sin éxito.
817
1,801
288
10,698
648,926
Ettore Fieramosca retweeted
ÚLTIMA HORA | El presidente del Tribunal Superior Electoral de Brasil, el juez Kassio Nunes Marques, acaba de lanzar una advertencia demoledora: No existía absolutamente ninguna regla que permitiera extender la votación dos horas. Fue una orden sin precedentes de un magistrado del Supremo aliado de Lula, que terminó beneficiando a sus regiones. La decisión preliminar, dictada después del cierre de las urnas, generó graves dificultades en el proceso electoral. “No había regulaciones que autorizaran ninguna extensión”, afirmó Nunes Marques. Y lo dijo con claridad histórica: “Nunca, en toda la historia del TSE, ha habido una extensión.” También advirtió que era materialmente imposible, en pocas horas, garantizar que una decisión judicial de ese calibre no provocara efectos secundarios —especialmente tecnológicos— capaces de alterar de forma significativa el conteo de votos. Y remató con un recordatorio contundente al Supremo: la Constitución atribuye competencia exclusiva a la Justicia Electoral para dirigir el proceso electoral. No al STF.
779
13,779
787
36,103
1,407,297
Ettore Fieramosca retweeted
The Soros family knows how to fix elections.
Lula Lula Lula! Congrats to Brazil for standing up against authoritarianism once again! 🇧🇷 ⚖️✌️
1,120
1,708
74
12,339
140,184
Ettore Fieramosca retweeted
Today’s presidential election in Brazil must be annulled. The two-hour voting extension was planned in advance. Polls in Bolsonaro’s counties were closed and sealed by 5:00 p.m. as required, while polls in Lula’s counties remained open after 5:00 p.m. This was all by design—complete electoral fraud. @SecRubio @ChrisLandauUSA @StateDept @AAGDhillon @TheJusticeDept @AGToddBlanche @realDonaldTrump @america @berniemoreno @FlavioBolsonaro @BolsonaroSP @jairbolsonaro @CarlosBolsonaro @bolsonarotv_ @JMilei @joseantoniokast @ABDELAESPRIELLA @DanielNoboaOk @SantiPenap @KeikoFujimori @Rodrigo_PazP
8
28
224
15,042
Ettore Fieramosca retweeted
Pretty weird …
997
2,026
94
41,856
795,574
Ettore Fieramosca retweeted
Basta ya de hacerse trampas al solitario. No aportan. No quieren integrarse. No aprecian lo que nosotros valoramos. Y son una amenaza para la convivencia, la libertad y la prosperidad. Tienen todo Marruecos para hacer el salvaje, si así lo desean. Pero no nuestras ciudades. España no es su parque de atracciones.
Un minuto diez segundos de argumentos para relegislar absolutamente todo lo relativo a la inmigración en España: reagrupaciones, permisos de residencia, (des)nacionalizaciones, visados, asilo y ayudas. El día 29 nos vemos. xitter.cf/CxpitanSalami/status/2…
145
1,456
18
6,364
160,678
Ettore Fieramosca retweeted
Replying to @StephenKing
Your mental model outside of short-sighted tribalism is pathetically stupid
2,162
5,311
183
110,639
1,255,959
Ettore Fieramosca retweeted
Replying to @CollinRugg
Stealing companies is a serious crime. Prison for Reich.
2,418
4,216
162
56,402
668,911
Ettore Fieramosca retweeted
For the fools out there, Zelensky himself posted about using Starlink for offensive drone strikes, which has always been against Starlink’s terms of service:
2,387
10,604
805
45,515
1,702,373
Estamos orgullosos de robar, mi padre ha venido conmigo. El 29 nos vamos a Marruecos…Lo reconocen, son criminales, y se quedan tan anchos. #Barcelona #Marruecos
43
420
6
574
8,756
Universidad Pompeu Fabra.
100
299
22
604
11,202
Ettore Fieramosca retweeted
Most Western democracies have been hacked. Not with code. With institutional architecture. Let me show you how it works, using the most advanced example: the European Union. First, how it works. Once every five years, you vote for a European Parliament that cannot even initiate legislation. The body that proposes laws is the Commission: 27 commissioners nobody elected, appointed after backroom bargaining between heads of state. Bills are then negotiated between the Commission, Parliament and Council in "trilogues", closed-door meetings where the real decisions get made. A law that will apply to 450 million people goes through corridors that 99.9% of them will never see. Now look at who's in those corridors. Brussels has become the lobbying capital of the world: nearly 18,000 organizations on the transparency register, tens of thousands of lobbyists, more than 50 for every single MEP. And that's just the declared part. Add the revolving door: a former MEP only has to wait six months before becoming a lobbyist to the EU himself. The real problem is distance. A national MP who votes for a law that ruins the farmers in his district runs into them at the market on Saturday. In Brussels, the decision-maker never meets the people who live with his decisions. But he meets lobbyists every day: at lunch, at cocktails, at conferences. So the system doesn't optimize for the wellbeing of the people. It optimizes for the interests of whoever is in the room. You don't even need corruption for that, incentives are enough. Although sometimes, as Qatargate showed, there's corruption too. The result: the system has a structural incentive to accept things the people would never vote for. Take Mercosur. Twenty-five years of negotiations. France votes against it in the Council in January 2026 and gets outvoted. To keep national parliaments from blocking it, the Commission splits the deal into two texts, including a trade agreement that only needs a vote in Brussels. The European Parliament itself writes, in black and white, that this split circumvents the right of national parliaments, and refers the deal to the EU Court of Justice. The Commission's response: it has been applying the agreement provisionally since May 1, 2026, without waiting for the Court's opinion. Farmers were protesting outside Parliament. They lost anyway. And remember the one time the people were actually asked about Europe directly: in 2005, France and the Netherlands rejected the European Constitution. The text came back two years later as the Lisbon Treaty, ratified by parliaments. No more referendums. But the worst of it is immigration. In 2015, relocation quotas were imposed by qualified majority on countries that had voted against them. Since June 12, 2026, the Pact on Migration and Asylum applies across the entire Union, with its "mandatory solidarity" mechanism: you take people in, or you pay. Not a single European people has ever been consulted directly on this, even though it's the issue that is transforming our societies most profoundly. And this is where we have to talk about the most sophisticated piece of the machine: George Soros. Soros understood before anyone else that you don't need to win elections if you shape the ecosystem around the people who make decisions. His network, the Open Society Foundations, describes itself as the largest private funder of advocacy groups in the world. In Brussels, it runs its own lobbying arm aimed at EU institutions, the Open Society European Policy Institute. Here's what we know from internal documents leaked in 2016: a document titled "Reliable allies in the European Parliament" listed more than 200 MEPs. Strategy papers described building "inside-track groups" to caucus "internal allies" who could advance their goals in their daily work. Training sessions were organized for MEPs on how to counter so-called populist parties. The mechanism is brutally elegant. Think tanks produce the "expertise". NGOs produce the "demand from civil society". Legal NGOs litigate in the courts. Funded media outlets produce the narrative. The Brussels decision-maker, cut off from the population, hears the same message from every direction and ends up believing that this is what people want. And the craziest part: the institutions fund the loop themselves. Between 2021 and 2023, the EU paid around €7.4 billion to NGOs, and the European Court of Auditors found the use of that money insufficiently transparent. It even came out that the Commission had funded NGOs to lobby MEPs in favor of its own Green Deal legislation. The institution pays "civil society" to ask it to do what it already wanted to do. All of this is legal. That's exactly what makes it a hack and not a crime. The system works exactly as designed, except nobody designed it for the people anymore. The patch is simple to state and hard to impose: bring decisions back closer to the people who bear them, hold referendums on issues that change a civilization, create a mandatory register for every influence actor, NGOs included, with their funding sources, and shut the revolving door. Until that happens, European democracy will remain what it has become: a user interface sitting on top of a system that runs for someone else.
🤖 Made with AI
269
2,594
369
5,594
124,820
Hay pocos puntos de vista sobre la UE tan bien explicados como este: xitter.cf/brivael/status/2114088…
Most Western democracies have been hacked. Not with code. With institutional architecture. Let me show you how it works, using the most advanced example: the European Union. First, how it works. Once every five years, you vote for a European Parliament that cannot even initiate legislation. The body that proposes laws is the Commission: 27 commissioners nobody elected, appointed after backroom bargaining between heads of state. Bills are then negotiated between the Commission, Parliament and Council in "trilogues", closed-door meetings where the real decisions get made. A law that will apply to 450 million people goes through corridors that 99.9% of them will never see. Now look at who's in those corridors. Brussels has become the lobbying capital of the world: nearly 18,000 organizations on the transparency register, tens of thousands of lobbyists, more than 50 for every single MEP. And that's just the declared part. Add the revolving door: a former MEP only has to wait six months before becoming a lobbyist to the EU himself. The real problem is distance. A national MP who votes for a law that ruins the farmers in his district runs into them at the market on Saturday. In Brussels, the decision-maker never meets the people who live with his decisions. But he meets lobbyists every day: at lunch, at cocktails, at conferences. So the system doesn't optimize for the wellbeing of the people. It optimizes for the interests of whoever is in the room. You don't even need corruption for that, incentives are enough. Although sometimes, as Qatargate showed, there's corruption too. The result: the system has a structural incentive to accept things the people would never vote for. Take Mercosur. Twenty-five years of negotiations. France votes against it in the Council in January 2026 and gets outvoted. To keep national parliaments from blocking it, the Commission splits the deal into two texts, including a trade agreement that only needs a vote in Brussels. The European Parliament itself writes, in black and white, that this split circumvents the right of national parliaments, and refers the deal to the EU Court of Justice. The Commission's response: it has been applying the agreement provisionally since May 1, 2026, without waiting for the Court's opinion. Farmers were protesting outside Parliament. They lost anyway. And remember the one time the people were actually asked about Europe directly: in 2005, France and the Netherlands rejected the European Constitution. The text came back two years later as the Lisbon Treaty, ratified by parliaments. No more referendums. But the worst of it is immigration. In 2015, relocation quotas were imposed by qualified majority on countries that had voted against them. Since June 12, 2026, the Pact on Migration and Asylum applies across the entire Union, with its "mandatory solidarity" mechanism: you take people in, or you pay. Not a single European people has ever been consulted directly on this, even though it's the issue that is transforming our societies most profoundly. And this is where we have to talk about the most sophisticated piece of the machine: George Soros. Soros understood before anyone else that you don't need to win elections if you shape the ecosystem around the people who make decisions. His network, the Open Society Foundations, describes itself as the largest private funder of advocacy groups in the world. In Brussels, it runs its own lobbying arm aimed at EU institutions, the Open Society European Policy Institute. Here's what we know from internal documents leaked in 2016: a document titled "Reliable allies in the European Parliament" listed more than 200 MEPs. Strategy papers described building "inside-track groups" to caucus "internal allies" who could advance their goals in their daily work. Training sessions were organized for MEPs on how to counter so-called populist parties. The mechanism is brutally elegant. Think tanks produce the "expertise". NGOs produce the "demand from civil society". Legal NGOs litigate in the courts. Funded media outlets produce the narrative. The Brussels decision-maker, cut off from the population, hears the same message from every direction and ends up believing that this is what people want. And the craziest part: the institutions fund the loop themselves. Between 2021 and 2023, the EU paid around €7.4 billion to NGOs, and the European Court of Auditors found the use of that money insufficiently transparent. It even came out that the Commission had funded NGOs to lobby MEPs in favor of its own Green Deal legislation. The institution pays "civil society" to ask it to do what it already wanted to do. All of this is legal. That's exactly what makes it a hack and not a crime. The system works exactly as designed, except nobody designed it for the people anymore. The patch is simple to state and hard to impose: bring decisions back closer to the people who bear them, hold referendums on issues that change a civilization, create a mandatory register for every influence actor, NGOs included, with their funding sources, and shut the revolving door. Until that happens, European democracy will remain what it has become: a user interface sitting on top of a system that runs for someone else.
10
Una forma más en la que se manifiesta el presente distópico invertido es montar estructuras de control y censura estatal de las redes sociales porque la ultraderecha dice no sé qué barbaridades, pero si las mismas se usan para quedar y llevar acabo actos vandálicos, saqueos y agresiones es democracia y libertad de expresión. Nos pasa lo que nos pasa con toda la razón.
10