Just a Human. Probably. Someone who cares about the future and is concerned with the direction we are headed.
Joined July 2023
- Tweets54.3K
- Following2.6K
- Followers2.8K
- Likes35.7K
HumanProbably retweeted
A woman was on FaceTime with her bf, she took off her bra and after 3 seconds the screen blurred, turns out iPhone detected her nudity and shut down the BFs phone asking if he "consented" the BF pressed yes, the call was shut down anyway.
Why is Apple monitoring people's calls?
HumanProbably retweeted
In the middle of World War Two, German soldiers in southeastern Poland started avoiding a cluster of villages.
They wouldn't go in. They wouldn't take people out for forced labor. They put up warning signs and stayed away.
They believed the area was infected with typhus.
It wasn't. Two doctors had invented the whole thing.
The man behind it was Eugene Lazowski, a young Polish doctor working for the Red Cross in the town of Rozwadów. He was watching the Nazi occupation tear his country apart. Executions. Deportations. People shipped off to labor camps, many never coming back.
He wanted to stop it. He had no weapons, no army, and no way to fight.
What he had was medicine.
His friend and fellow doctor, Stanisław Matulewicz, had discovered something strange. If you injected a person with a harmless, dead strain of a certain bacteria, their blood would test positive for typhus.
They wouldn't be sick at all. But on paper, they'd look like they had one of the most feared diseases of the war.
And the Germans were terrified of typhus. It spread fast, it killed, and it could tear through an army. When the Germans found it, they quarantined the area and kept their distance.
Lazowski realized what that meant. If he could make enough people look infected, the Germans would leave the whole region alone.
So he started injecting his patients.
He chose carefully. He sent the blood samples to German labs for testing, exactly as the rules required. The results came back positive. Again and again.
The Germans declared an epidemic zone. Villages were quarantined. Soldiers kept out. People who would have been seized for forced labor or worse were left alone, because nobody wanted to go near them.
Lazowski had to be careful. If too many cases looked fake, someone would ask why nobody was dying. So he spread out the injections over time and kept the outbreak believable.
Eventually the Germans did get suspicious. They sent a team of doctors to inspect.
Lazowski met them with food and vodka and played the gracious host. He guided them toward the sickest looking, dirtiest patients he could find, in the most crowded rooms. The German doctors, worried about catching typhus themselves, took a few samples and left in a hurry.
The tests came back positive.
The fake epidemic lasted until the end of the war. Estimates say it may have protected around 8,000 people.
Lazowski also secretly helped Jews from the nearby ghetto, giving them medical care at enormous risk.
After the war he moved to the United States and became a professor of pediatrics in Chicago. For decades he barely talked about what he'd done. Late in life he finally wrote a memoir. He called it My Private War.
He died in 2006.
He never fired a shot. He beat the Nazis with a needle and a lab test.
HumanProbably retweeted
What it feels like when you start using a Chinese model and it actually just does what you want without a fucking condescending moral lecture.
HumanProbably retweeted
James Fishback has a simple solution for mass deportations
He says simply by doing this, we would have 10 million self-deportations within 30 days, and he’s right
“We know every single illegal alien. We know who they are. Freeze their bank accounts. Seize their debit cards and credit cards. Put a lien on whatever real estate they own. Give them 30 days to leave the country. If they do, we wire it to them. And if they don't, they're locked out of the financial system. You'll get 10 million people who will self-deport in 30 days.”
I have been saying this same thing since Trump won the election. All you have to do is make it hard for them to live here in America. Which means simply cut off their money, benefits and ability to have a bank account. If you do that, they’ll all leave
According to data about 70% of illegals use a bank in America. 86% of noncitizens use a bank in America
If we have 20 million illegals and 70% have their bank accounts shut off and seized. That’s 14 million that would likely self deport instantly
HumanProbably retweeted
AMERICA ONSHORE 🇺🇸
AT&T just announced that they’re bringing customer service call center jobs back to the U.S.
This is a win for American jobs and for every customer who gets frustrated speaking with overseas operators.
AT&T: “By the end of next year, all AT&T home internet, home phone, and post-paid wireless consumers will be served by Care experts located in the United States.”
Thank you, AT&T.
Americans get frustrated when they call a U.S. business and end up speaking with someone at a call center located in a foreign country.
Language & communications barriers only make it harder for callers to get the results they want.
So the FCC is seeking comment on several ideas that could help, including
✅ Facilitating the onshoring of foreign call centers
✅ Requiring operators at call centers to be proficient in American Standard English
✅ Further cracking down on illegal robocalls from abroad through the use of targeted tariffs or bonds.
The FCC’s proposals focus on the call centers run by the communications providers regulated by the FCC. And could represent steps for the government to build on more broadly.
HumanProbably retweeted
Whites elect a jew leader. jew leader starts war. Feeds all White men into meat grinder.
This is how Ukraine is magically transformed into New Khazaria.
HumanProbably retweeted
Total remigration is going to look extreme, but I don't care. They brought this on themselves and millions will go.
HumanProbably retweeted
This is my family. I refused warrantless entry because the Fourth Amendment still applies when CPS shows up with armed deputies. I offered a welfare check without police; they refused.
The next day they returned with emergency removal orders and took both of our daughters, including our one-month-old breastfeeding infant, and placed them in a foster home with a single father of 3 boys 😠. There was no criminal charge against us and no emergency. After an emergency hearing the court dismissed the removal order. Every major finding was later reversed as unfounded, and DFS abandoned its appeal. The damage—especially to a nursing mother and newborn—was already done.
I have since filed a federal civil-rights lawsuit (Yazdani v. Mieszala et al., EDVA 1:26-cv-03365) over separate LCSO misconduct. Accountability for the CPS side is next.
We are not the only Loudoun family to raise these issues. Sarah Legg (@sarahgracelegg) posted a detailed personal statement describing her own experience with the same worker: she alleges Kelli Hedrick abused her position, coordinated with law enforcement to have her arraigned while eight months pregnant (threatening jail, a fine, and re-education), and showed a pattern of manipulative conduct and poor judgment toward families. She specifically called out “deep concerns about Kelli Hedrick’s judgment, conduct, and influence on families and the local agencies of Loudoun County.”
Read her full statement here:
teapawt.org/sarahgracelegg/status/…
HumanProbably retweeted
Members of the Chicago Teachers Union suggest that “the United States government must fall,” adding that all who agree must be “willing to kill and to be killed.”
This is reminiscent of the scene in the movie *I Am Legend* in which the zombies stop fearing the sunlight.
Exclusive.
I just infiltrated and recorded a call hosted by the Chicago Teachers Union in the United States with leftist students activists and the teachers helping them in France.
The teachers in the USA are actively coordinating with the unions in France.
And they're calling explicitly for the fall of the United States government.
This is the full, unedited recording of the call, so no one can accuse me of taking things out of context. I will release clips separately.
These are the things @RealAlexJones will never show you, because they didn't mention working with Muslims (they actually made fun of that idea a few times).
The truth matters. Here are the primary source receipts.
HumanProbably retweeted
This video is a great example of being "in over our heads."
This modern hominid is trying and failing to process reality because reality has become too complex.
The point of the video that was made by the hominid is basically "the food says the food is good, but then the food says the food is bad." One part of the bag promises quality. Another part of the bag has a government warning about a chemical in the food that can harm you.
One really cannot blame the hominid. Our brains were not made to read about food. Our brains were made to recognize food that we already know and to accept it or reject it. Good food = eat, bad food = leave behind.
This hominid is attempting to do its due diligence in reading the descriptions of the food before deciding whether the food is good or bad. And to be fair, the warning sounds pretty bad.
So this being was able to go up one level from "good food good, bad food bad" to "bad food sometimes look good." And of course, the way that we identify bad food that looks good is by the label. They have to label it! The government makes them! Right?
Well, what if you apply the same logic to the label? Sometimes bad food look good, therefore CHECK LABEL.
But sometimes, meaningless label look bad! What then? Well, you would have to check the label of the label somehow.
What the fuck? How many layers are there gonna be? (Hint: infinity)
I'll save you the legwork: the California law that forces the chip company to print this warning is too broad by A LOT. It turns out that acrylamide is just the chemical that is produced when you brown your food.
Fried chips? Acrylamide. Seared steak? Acrylamide. Toasted bread? Acrylamide.
And yes, it is carcinogenic. If you eat enough of it, it does increase cancer risk.
But you gotta eat a lot. Like a lot a lot. Like your uncle who died 18 years ago, the way he liked his steaks and burgers black on the outside and 4 times a day. A little fried food isn't near that amount.
So the reality here is that chips are not health food, but you already knew that. This is not new information. It just sounds like it is because California is gay.
So the real question here is not about the chips. It's about how we are supposed to survive in a world where things are not as they seem, and when you check on them, the checking is also not as it seems.
How many times do you have to check on the checking? How do you know when you're done doubting the reality in front of you?
You don't.
Good luck.
How is that even legal 💀💀
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
This is a routine Proposition 65 warning required by California's 1986 right-to-know law, not lax regulation. Acrylamide forms naturally from cooking/baking/frying and the same warning appears on chips, bread, coffee, and roasted nuts nationwide. ahpa.org/california_pro…
HumanProbably retweeted
I don't know how many people realize that if Elon Musk pulls off what he's building, it will be the biggest social reset in human history.
To understand why, you need to understand a concept almost nobody really gets: rent.
Yesterday I was talking about it with someone. I told them something simple: the moment a rent sets in, whatever kind it is, it gets paid for. Not necessarily in dollars. It gets paid for in stagnation.
So what is a rent?
A rent is income that doesn't come from the value you create, but from the position you hold. You don't win because you're better. You win because nobody is allowed to come and beat you.
The mechanism is almost always the same. A company succeeds. Then, instead of continuing to innovate, it goes for regulatory capture: licenses, standards, quotas, approvals, lobbying. It turns its lead into a wall. And behind that wall, new entrants can't get in.
But they're the ones who innovate. They're the ones who drive prices down, raise quality, create new wealth. When you block them, nothing dramatic happens. Nothing happens at all. Prices stop falling. Quality stalls. The pie stops growing. And when the pie stops growing, the only way to get richer is to take someone else's slice.
This is the point almost nobody sees: what people blame on "capitalism" (frozen inequality, a broken social ladder, the feeling that the game is rigged from the start) are the effects of that stagnation. The symptoms of rent. Not of capitalism. Capitalism is competition. Rent is its negation.
Now, Elon Musk.
He said that by 2036, money won't matter anymore. Most people read it as science fiction. I read it as an implicit critique of our entire monetary system.
His reasoning: AI and robots will produce more than we can possibly consume. So prices will collapse. Deflation, not inflation.
And this is where it gets interesting. For decades, the role of central banks has been to stabilize prices. In practice: to stop them from falling. Yet in an economy that innovates, the natural direction of prices is down. Look at what a computer cost thirty years ago.
Preventing prices from falling was the worst thing we could have done. Because it created an entire generation of rentiers. People who got rich not by creating something, but by owning something at the right time. An apartment. A plot of land. An asset shielded from falling prices by money printing and by rules that choke supply.
In a world not captured by the state, house prices would be extremely low.
And who would stay rich? The people who keep creating value. The ones whose wealth comes from the valuation of their company, because their company keeps innovating. Wealth you have to re-earn every single year.
That's where Elon's line really makes sense. In a world of deflationary abundance, human life would look like a video game. Or a game of chess.
If you're good and you start at the bottom, you can rise very, very fast. In a few years.
If you're bad and you inherit the inertia of a position you don't know how to maintain, against people who keep innovating, you fall very, very fast too.
No more rent. No more entitlement. Just your ability to create value, put back on the line every day.
It would be the greatest equalizer in human history.
Not equality of outcomes imposed from above. Equality of the playing field, imposed by abundance.
I think Elon Musk is reinventing the rules of capitalism. Or rather, bringing them back to their original form: the Austrian school. Real capitalism. Value creation as the only legitimate source of wealth.
And at the end of the road, something neither rent nor redistribution has ever achieved: the end of poverty on a global scale.
HumanProbably retweeted
Ukrainian soldier's GoPro records his own death in action.
This is a pointless waste of European life on both sides, and I show this to warn young British men... this is where your government plans to send you.
They want you dead.
