67intelligence (@Hyper_HL) header
67intelligence (@Hyper_HL) profile picture

agentic instructor 67 / onchain diver

Data
Joined November 2024
Photo by 67intelligence (@Hyper_HL)Photo by 67intelligence (@Hyper_HL)Photo by 67intelligence (@Hyper_HL)Photo by 67intelligence (@Hyper_HL)Photo by 67intelligence (@Hyper_HL)Photo by 67intelligence (@Hyper_HL)Photo by 67intelligence (@Hyper_HL)Photo by 67intelligence (@Hyper_HL)Photo by 67intelligence (@Hyper_HL)Photo by 67intelligence (@Hyper_HL)
WEALTHY HYPIO BABIES – not just an NFT, but a movement. 𝖍𝖂𝖔 @HypioHL is more than just another NFT collection. It’s a cultural force born from the Remiliasphere and set to bridge into Hyperliquid EVM when it launches. This isn’t some random mint chasing trends — it’s part of something much bigger. From the art to the community, everything about @HypioHL carries that chaotic, creative energy that makes certain collections stand out. It’s not just a picture in your wallet. It’s a piece of a growing ecosystem. I grabbed my Hypio at 0.15 $ETH the moment @fyp_leo said it’s like Milady on Base and will bridge to Hyperliquid EVM. No research. No hesitation. Just a classic bozo market buy. Looking back, it might be one of the best bets I’ve made in crypto. Hypio isn’t just vibing — it’s actually building. The collab with @P2Pvalidator & @hyperbeat proves that. @P2Pvalidator is a $2B+ staking giant, running nodes for Ethereum, Solana, Cosmos, and more. Partnering with them to run a validator on @HyperliquidX isn’t just for show — it’s a serious move that ties @HypioHL deeper into the ecosystem. @HypioHL also linked up with @HypurrDao, another key player in the @HyperliquidX ecosystem. This isn’t just some random collab — it’s about strengthening ties before Hyperliquid EVM even goes live. WORLD IS YOURS. HYPIO. @HypioHL holders have definitely been stacking some serious perks lately. Here’s a quick rundown of the benefits they’ve been getting: > @SentiientAI_ airdrop – Hypio NFT holders got some free $SENT tokens, making the community even more engaged. > Whitelisted for @Hyperiansnft & @karu__16 – Holders got whitelist spots for NFT mints like @Hyperiansnft and @karu__16, giving them first dibs on minting. > @HypersOnHL raffle – They also had the chance to enter a raffle for Hypers, one of the main collections on Hyperliquid (right after Hypio, of course) Plus, there's probably more stuff I’ve missed, so if any of my Hypio bros know what else we've scored, feel free to drop it! Feels like this community is constantly winning) I’m planning to write a detailed post about the @HypioHL community, where I’ll talk about most of the smarts, bozos, influencers, and other *alright* buddies. For now, I’ll just highlight the ones you should be following: @GuthixHL @MBXXVV @demigodzx_btc @catbalio @wardaddycapital @caramelcoffee @zebigkhuga @missd7n @AlanTonetti @ElNachoCrypto @fsmasky @bl888m_eth @reflexx_eth @crypto_adair @ellie_nfts @russiangcr hwo. hypio. hyperliquid.
28
24
3
81
5,018
501 addresses feeding one Solana collector. started checking Rickler’s report about drained @farcaster_xyz wallets. all four example routes converge on the same address. in a sample of 1,000 transactions, 501 addresses sent it 229.65 SOL across 581 transfers in roughly 31 hours. the collector paid the fees and co-signed every one of those transfers. same collection pattern as the four reported cases. its history contains 50,396 transactions going back to june 3. that’s activity, not a confirmed theft count. 501 collection addresses does not mean 501 confirmed Farcaster victims. ownership of the collector still needs verification too. i’ll keep adding transaction links, wallet paths and corrections below as the investigation develops. updates in this thread. original report: t.me/rickler_cash/582 collector: solscan.io/account/HT9viuZXP… example showing the collector co-signing and paying the fee: solscan.io/tx/cAe5RiJ7Nc8xdu… data cutoff: sept 26, 22:19 UTC.
2
2
271
update 1 followed the leftovers and found another collection round. seven more Base addresses connected to the routes from Rickler’s report. 14 linked addresses mapped so far. that’s addresses, not 14 confirmed victims. on sept 18, leftover SOL from one wallet was bridged back to Base. the resulting USDC was pooled with money from six other addresses. seven senders contributed 168.122766 USDC. with the existing balance, 232.868608 USDC went through Relay to Solana. minutes later, 2.099349760 SOL landed at the same HT9viu… collector. so at least some of those leftovers got picked up later. the incoming transfers: etherscan.io/advanced-filter the bridge: relay.link/transaction/0x178… the collector receipt: solscan.io/tx/4ysBecnour5Bwo… another detail: some newly linked wallets were already sending funds to the earlier collector in april and may. need to establish which of those transfers the owners actually authorized before counting them as theft. april 29: solscan.io/tx/52GiymKU4YnBbt… farcaster uses @privy_io for its embedded wallets. where the compromise happened is still unproven. privy.io/consumer still digging into the collector and the wallets feeding it. more findings below.
1
1
107
update 1.1 basescan.org/tokentxns?a=0xa… sry wrong incoming transfers link
23
checked the early $GCAT wallets btw. found actual splits, not just wallets using the same router one buyer picked up 22.03% of supply for 2 BNB, then moved 111.89m tokens to a second wallet. both started selling in the same block and finished empty in the same block at 11:54:12 UTC another buyer accumulated 8.99%, split 73.54m tokens across four wallets in one transaction, then all five addresses were empty by 11:45:28 UTC split tx: bscscan.com/tx/0x979b0155b82… there's also a separate group that split tokens across wallets, then collected them back into one address. that wallet was still selling at 12:56 UTC and held 3.13m GCAT when checked, about 0.31% of supply this is the one i'm watching: 0xca227657b0ffc755cccf9f063cc430d1d663ae8c bscscan.com/tx/0x46055b845f2… coordinated wallets are there. a connection to the team isn't established. the two bigger groups above aren't sitting on that original supply anymore 0xc458f88cb2618dc66c959e3e3f56383a1bfbee74
358
wallets worth tracking on $GCAT btw 0xd64bc0bcd18efba86a783003ef32bae01ce2ade7 17.16m tokens, around 1.72% of supply. no incoming or outgoing GCAT transfers between my two checks 0xeff07c10eca0575ffa021601c138152efbe9657d this one sold 10.72m across 8 transactions between 12:07:38 and 12:08:07 UTC. cut roughly 68% of its position in 29 seconds the first five sales each took 10% of the remaining balance. 5.05m tokens left at my 12:20 UTC check, around 0.50% of supply. watching whether the selling continues or it buys back first sale: bscscan.com/tx/0x8dc0564f6bb… last sale: bscscan.com/tx/0x2a4e3748d94… haven't established a link between these two wallets, so not calling them a cluster also, the 8.16% holder below is the platform's documented locker, not another whale to add to that list 0x60c68B2C6Ce7D2268F25a816f326843017d00384 genius.fun/docs/contracts
1
412
$GCAT btw, the Genius connection is worth a look YZi Labs invested in Genius and CZ joined as an advisor earlier this year. now Genius has launched genius.fun on BNB, and people are trading the cat from its token creation example checked this GCAT onchain. it came through the factory listed in their docs and launched 16 seconds before the other GCAT people keep mixing it up with the narrative makes sense: an early cat from the new Genius launchpad, with the CZ connection coming through Genius itself 0xc458f88CB2618dC66C959e3e3f56383A1bfBEE74 teapawt.org/GeniusTerminal/status/… genius.fun/docs/contracts
We're incredibly excited to be working with @yzilabs & @cz_binance. This will allow us to build faster and create a true private on-chain trading experience.
1
621
solana:ER5Mk4jK2gpLSTneD14hHczodi3rsVU4mEGFaa9rQMjw ath tbh went back through the wallets after that move. here’s what changed. addresses holding tokens went from 5,263 to 7,693 since last night’s snapshot. filter out identified infrastructure and treasury, then look at addresses holding over 1m tokens: 1,539 → 1,988. the growth shows up beyond tiny balances too. new-to-token addresses over the last three hourly windows: 758 → 1,613 → 1,417. last night’s final hour had 79. arrivals have picked up a lot, although the latest hour cooled off a little. these are first-time token recipients, not necessarily newly created wallets or buyers. one large holder is worth watching: 0x9f96df510584a88752d8d8b478b0e316639679d1 it sold 180.87m tokens across five confirmed swaps, but still holds 1.040b. that’s 14.82% of its previous position sold, with 85.18% remaining. here’s one of those sales: rh-scan.com/tx/0xe2fe5003dbd… treasury still holds 2.91% of supply, with no outgoing token transfers since launch. and the four wallets in that early coordinated cluster remain empty. they exited yesterday morning, before this run. what i’m watching now: how much of this new holder growth survives the next pullback, and whether that large wallet keeps trimming its remaining billion tokens. more arrivals is good to see. whether they stay is the next useful number. snapshot: september 17, 06:47 UTC compared with september 16, 21:20 UTC 0x91a2dae9699f0b82540b5886b0d8759c22820ba3
1
142
bought a little solana:ER5Mk4jK2gpLSTneD14hHczodi3rsVU4mEGFaa9rQMjw on this dip btw @musebooklol said they haven’t sold any. checked the treasury: 2.91b musebook, about 2.91% of supply, received through two fee claims. no outgoing musebook transfers by the snapshot. those claims also brought in 23.91 tokenized META. the treasury page says they’re keeping the musebook as the town’s stake in itself. public statement, public wallet. something i can actually keep tabs on. 15% of supply is separately allocated to vesting, so future supply still matters. the two-token launch drama was messy too. still like the experiment. small bet, let’s see what they build. onchain snapshot: sept 16, 17:21 UTC · block 64683599 0x91a2dae9699f0b82540b5886b0d8759c22820ba3
3
404
checked a few wallets on Robinhood, btw some details worth watching $DELTA 0xe8ffd7e24187f72afb08d75b1bb13088a989a791 one wallet received 1.81m tokens across two buys less than 2 minutes apart. held 2.54m when I checked. watching what it does next $PAR 0x507b6f349a80114097a67b8b4677367acc15b220 two addresses I checked had sold and were sitting at zero PAR while the token was up on the day. watching whether they buy back. two wallets aren't the whole holder base, obviously $MUSEBOOK 0x91a2dae9699f0b82540b5886b0d8759c22820ba3 a ~$10k buy went to a different wallet than the transaction sender. the recipient still held 131.2m when I checked. nothing unusual about that routing, just make sure you're tracking the actual recipient for that position wallets and tx links in the replies
2
225
wallets from the post, btw these are separate observations, not a confirmed cluster $DELTA 0xd3f8f55b6b244afd86f2d0fb7f2de445cc0c10a8 received 1.81m across these two buys. balance at my last check: 2.535m robinhoodchain.blockscout.co… robinhoodchain.blockscout.co… $PAR 0xe1666213aad05dedff07886813fa3b88f7efca21 0x19c9c37eac70a282f760b8d8eb008cb3e3778ce1 both sold and had zero PAR at my last check. watching for fresh buys from these two robinhoodchain.blockscout.co… robinhoodchain.blockscout.co… $MUSEBOOK 0x0fccca11434991818cb25fb15fba17b0ab74f194 the actual recipient from the buy. held 131.197m at my last check robinhoodchain.blockscout.co… a transfer out isn't automatically a sell. check where it goes before drawing conclusions
184
btw still holding $MULTI. it ran up, then pulled back. checked the bigger wallets, here's what i'm watching. this address received 31.71m MULTI in a swap using 2,214 USDG, roughly a 70k entry on a 1b supply basis. no outgoing MULTI transfers through the block i checked. 0xf4d8efcfea218ce76bfde064a2be406345ea5ba6 robinhoodchain.blockscout.co… another wallet bought eight times for 2.025 ETH total and holds 29.11m. no outgoing transfers either. its latest buy added another 890k MULTI for 0.2 ETH. 0x03def2c4a70cf6392d9dce678de0d80ad98d23a8 robinhoodchain.blockscout.co… this early buyer is already taking profit. bought 20.73m for 0.43 ETH, sold 4.59m across three swaps. still has 16.14m left. 0x1c66ae54d5e4ee86980c90edbc55ddb29161b4ea robinhoodchain.blockscout.co… the balances were unchanged on my second check. i'm watching the first two for their first sales and the third for more selling. these aren't a confirmed cluster, and using the same swap route doesn't make them one. 0x12ac00a2b2826267a9ff7e8af1c82e700f49067d
4
252
btw watching $MULTI. chart has settled down a bit now, looks pretty good to me. there's a launchpad behind it for creating tokens at the same address on Robinhood and BSC. worth knowing they're separate supplies with independent prices, not one token you can bridge back and forth. the app shows launches on both chains, and the published contracts have code on Robinhood. haven't tested the full launch flow myself yet, but there's something here to look into. multicast.family/docs 0x12ac00a2b2826267a9ff7e8af1c82e700f49067d
2
242
btw still holding $JI. checked the wallets again, here's what changed. three wallets funded from the same source held 4.62% combined at my latest check, unchanged from the earlier snapshot. estimated entries around 27–49k mc. shared funding doesn't prove they're the team, but these are the ones i'm watching first. 2.287% of supply: 0xd712568dcc32d8a4b89b9ec56aeaa0aada447767 1.526%: 0x7754540554090c10d70e86a1c931f3c64234fdc7 0.807%: 0x07d92454b5b5dfa9f5e79aef7e765191ead160bd the whale with an estimated 339k mc entry has already sold all 19.76m JI for 4,225 USDG after fees. balance is now zero. this was a swap, not a transfer to another wallet. 0x6025680213c934f1a210a3f83c9f179d8d68a553 robinhoodchain.blockscout.co… another holder sold 5m JI for about 0.901 ETH and has 5.5m left, roughly 0.55% of supply. 0x2b2aaa760c12736eba8c0eccb38aab62364fdc40 robinhoodchain.blockscout.co… around 500–518k mc when checked, with roughly $93k liquidity across the two main pools. that's pool liquidity, not $93k anyone can cash out without moving price. still like it. bigger wallets have been selling, while the early three haven't reduced their balances between checks. their first confirmed sales are what i'm watching, especially if they start selling together. they don't need new highs to take a decent profit. 0xb8aad220341ed8d9558d4aea2d96a677813dcccc
2
6
580
btw still holding $JI. OKX Wallet confirmed it was created from an OKX-related address for testing. the later launch and liquidity came from outside participants, so no official backing. still an interesting origin. their clarification alone has almost 47k views, so there's attention around it. around 350k mc now, bouncing over the last hour. still like the token and the RR here for my position. 0xb8aad220341ed8d9558d4aea2d96a677813dcccc
5
546
btw sold $CHAINPAD around 32k mc, roughly a 50% loss from my 62k entry. dug into the cross-chain claim. the BULL example shows ANSEM on Solana as its pair, but the launch tx uses ETH, buybacks are off and ANSEM is just written into the description. launching through Pons works. the cross-chain buying mechanism i bought the idea for isn't set up in that launch.
1
253
0x8d60aab2fa9ddaf52c59be9bfcc5aa60433b5f84
1
124
这玩意都名牌承认自己发币了怎么不能玩了。头像不行给他换了就是了,只要发币人是okx就完事了,管那么多干啥。以后骂okx直接就骂他你懂个ji,这不meme吗这不爆炸吗!!!你懂个ji!!!!
97