A journal for intelligence researchers, by intelligence researchers Editor in Chief, Thomas Coyle (@ThomasRCoyle)

Joined December 2024
Not yet two years old, and Intelligence & Cognitive Abilities is proving the need for a high-quality, peer-reviewed outlet for human intelligence research. We look forward to receiving your work, and to getting ever more eyes on IQ in the coming years! icajournal.scholasticahq.com…
8
353
Thomson's work was re-discovered literally in boxes, and tireless work the next 30 years created The Lothian follow-up studies: Brain volumes, genomics, the gamut
1
1
49
Intelligence & Cognitive Abilities retweeted
New research paper asking if there is a Flynn Effect for attention in the digital age, "the results further support domain differentiation of cross-temporal changes in cognitive abilities and contradict the notion of large changes in attention-related abilities in the digital age." icajournal.scholasticahq.com…
2
15
988
Call for papers: "AI and Intelligence", a special issue of Intelligence and Cognitive Abilities guest-edited by Emily A. Willoughby. Empirical and conceptual submissions welcome. Open now, read more here: icajournal.scholasticahq.com…
4
5
366
Intelligence & Cognitive Abilities retweeted
IQ and wine? A new study: "The results demonstrate that g predicts the depth and density of specialized knowledge acquisition and suggest the use of such microcosms to understand why g drives general knowledge and how knowledge accumulation is fostered by work requirements versus interest-driven exposures. icajournal.scholasticahq.com
5
23
2,312
Intelligence & Cognitive Abilities retweeted
Raise a glass to the newest study in @ICAJournal from Maximilian Krolo and @timothycbates, who find that smarter people know more about wine. 🍷 In a sample of 525 respondents, IQ and wine knowledge were positively correlated (r = .31), and this relationship did NOT diminish after controlling for exposure to the wine industry or drinking habits. If you're not a sommelier, this correlation doesn't matter much in real life. But the study has a lot of theoretical importance. Wine knowledge is complex, sophisticated, not taught in schools, and has little practical application for most people. This undermines the theory that smarter people know more facts because they have economic incentives to learn more or because they attend school longer. The people who knew the most about wine were those who had both (1) high IQ and (2) exposure to the wine industry. This likely means that exposure to a knowledge domain occurs that smarter people benefit more from that environment than less intelligent people. Cheers to the authors! 🥂 Read the full study (with no paywall) at doi.org/10.65550/001c.165719
5
1
18
1,300