
A journal for intelligence researchers, by intelligence researchers Editor in Chief, Thomas Coyle (@ThomasRCoyle)
Joined December 2024
- Tweets76
- Following28
- Followers772
- Likes108
Not yet two years old, and Intelligence & Cognitive Abilities is proving the need for a high-quality, peer-reviewed outlet for human intelligence research.
We look forward to receiving your work, and to getting ever more eyes on IQ in the coming years!
icajournal.scholasticahq.com…
Spearman’s hypothesis: group differences are biggest on the most g-loaded tests. In prison populations, Woodley et al report, the pattern flips upside down.
The Reversal of Spearman’s Hypothesis in Incarcerated Populations
doi.org/10.65550/001c.140843 Free to read.
A rare empirical examination of a century-old hypothesis, and a reminder g’s explanatory reach has edges. doi.org/10.65550/001c.140843
In ICA, @gtredoux tackles a recurrent but overlooked factor in scientific debate: The deep philosophical rifts that drive opposing scientists: In this case logical positivist Thomson and his career-long feud with Charles Spearman over g icajournal.scholasticahq.com…
Leader of one of the world's most productive labs working on IQ across the life-span, Ian Deary publishes in ICA on:
"Intelligence, Education, and Society: Godfrey Thomson’s Public and Professional Lectures" doi.org/10.65550/001c.137806
Free to read, comment here, and share!
Thomson's work was re-discovered literally in boxes, and tireless work the next 30 years created The Lothian follow-up studies: Brain volumes, genomics, the gamut
Recently Thomson's sample contributed to the first molecular genetic evidence that genes indeed work via a latent g-factor. Thomson would be… intrigued :-)
nature.com/articles/s41562-0…
Intelligence & Cognitive Abilities retweeted
Two new papers on group differences just published: icajournal.scholasticahq.com
Genes are great for disentangling genes from environment - in this case using *mothers* phenylketonuria (PKU) and development of intelligence in offspring: doi.org/10.65550/001c.138730
Intelligence & Cognitive Abilities retweeted
New research paper asking if there is a Flynn Effect for attention in the digital age, "the results further support domain differentiation of cross-temporal changes in cognitive abilities and contradict the notion of large changes in attention-related abilities in the digital age."
icajournal.scholasticahq.com…
Call for papers: "AI and Intelligence", a special issue of Intelligence and Cognitive Abilities guest-edited by Emily A. Willoughby.
Empirical and conceptual submissions welcome. Open now, read more here:
icajournal.scholasticahq.com…
Robert Plomin — the most influential living researcher on the genetics of intelligence — in ICA from day one.
Polygenic Score Prediction Within and Between Sibling Pairs. Lin et al. in Intelligence and Cognitive Abilities doi.org/10.65550/001c.140654
Why knowing things (not just knowing "how to look them up" is valuable.
Crystallized Intelligence: The Value of Factual Knowledge in Theory and Practice — Russell T. Warne in Intelligence and Cognitive Abilities doi.org/10.65550/001c.132390
Intelligence & Cognitive Abilities retweeted
IQ and wine? A new study: "The results demonstrate that g predicts the depth and density of specialized knowledge acquisition and suggest the use of such microcosms to understand why g drives general knowledge and how knowledge accumulation is fostered by work requirements versus interest-driven exposures. icajournal.scholasticahq.com
Intelligence & Cognitive Abilities retweeted
It's more complicated than it may seem: People with higher IQ scores tend to know more about wine, study finds via @psypost psypost.org/people-with-high…
Intelligence & Cognitive Abilities retweeted
Raise a glass to the newest study in @ICAJournal from Maximilian Krolo and @timothycbates, who find that smarter people know more about wine. 🍷
In a sample of 525 respondents, IQ and wine knowledge were positively correlated (r = .31), and this relationship did NOT diminish after controlling for exposure to the wine industry or drinking habits.
If you're not a sommelier, this correlation doesn't matter much in real life. But the study has a lot of theoretical importance. Wine knowledge is complex, sophisticated, not taught in schools, and has little practical application for most people. This undermines the theory that smarter people know more facts because they have economic incentives to learn more or because they attend school longer.
The people who knew the most about wine were those who had both (1) high IQ and (2) exposure to the wine industry. This likely means that exposure to a knowledge domain occurs that smarter people benefit more from that environment than less intelligent people.
Cheers to the authors! 🥂 Read the full study (with no paywall) at doi.org/10.65550/001c.165719




