In the Zellar retweeted
Replying to @conlin_lauren
First....the Boulder DA's office (Hunter, Bill Wise AND Mary Keenan) misrepresented (lied) that the 1999 grand jury did not issue any indictments. They ran with with that misrepresentation (lie) for 14 years until a lawsuit forced 4 pages to be released. Those pages stated that there were indictments after all.
Who did this misrepresention (lie) benefit?
In 2008 the Boulder's DA's office, now headed by Keenan, issue a public exoneration of the Ramseys based on DNA.
But guess what? Mary Keenan misrepresented (lie of omission) the facts about the DNA. I guessed she thought misrepresenting the facts worked so well back in 1999, why not try it again.
What facts about the DNA did she mispresent?
Here's some quotes and links.....
"""The DNA profile referred to as Unknown Male 1 — first identified during testing on the panties — may not be the DNA of a single person at all, but, rather, a composite of genetic material from multiple individuals."""
""..In fact, those experts said the evidence showed that the DNA samples recovered from the long johns came from at least two people in addition to JonBenet — something Lacy’s office was told, according to documents obtained by 9NEWS and the Camera, but that she made no mention of in clearing the Ramseys.""
"""The presence of a third person’s genetic markers has never before been publicly revealed."""
"""“It's a rather obvious point, but I mean, if you’re looking for someone that doesn’t exist, BECAUSE IT'S ACTUALLY SEVERAL PEOPLE, it’s a problem,” said Troy Eid, a former U.S. Attorney for Colorado."""'''
wcnc.com/article/news/invest…
""".... they also noted that additional samples of trace DNA found under the victim's fingernails and on the cord and garrotte used in the crime didn't match the long johns DNA or each other. The presence of so many different DNA samples, many of them too tiny or degraded to put into a database or even determine if they came from blood or skin tissues, suggests that JonBenét was killed by a sizable "foreign faction" of sadists — or that police were looking for a suspect who didn't exist."""""
westword.com/news/jonbenet-r…
(As an aside, the only theory in the Ramsey case that ever mentioned multiple people being involved in the murder was our sex ring theory..from Jan 1997...just sayin' 😉)
Again, the question begs to be asked, who benefitted the most from Keenan's misrepresentation?
The Boulder DA's office and Mary Keenan are not the heroes of the Ramsey case....they are actually some of the villains.
To learn more.....
teapawt.org/Frankz2137/status/1863…
teapawt.org/Frankz2137/status/1919…
In the Zellar retweeted
Replying to @901Lulu
2/
JonBenet Ramsey.🤔🧐
GRAND JURY PART l
teapawt.org/Frankz2137/status/1998…
GRAND JURY PART ll
teapawt.org/Frankz2137/status/1823…
GRAND JURY PART lll
teapawt.org/Frankz2137/status/1919…
GRAND JURY, MORE:
teapawt.org/Frankz2137/status/2095…
First....the Boulder DA's office (Hunter, Bill Wise AND Mary Keenan) misrepresented (lied) that the 1999 grand jury did not issue any indictments. They ran with with that misrepresentation (lie) for 14 years until a lawsuit forced 4 pages to be released. Those pages stated that there were indictments after all.
Who did this misrepresention (lie) benefit?
In 2008 the Boulder's DA's office, now headed by Keenan, issue a public exoneration of the Ramseys based on DNA.
But guess what? Mary Keenan misrepresented (lie of omission) the facts about the DNA. I guessed she thought misrepresenting the facts worked so well back in 1999, why not try it again.
What facts about the DNA did she mispresent?
Here's some quotes and links.....
"""The DNA profile referred to as Unknown Male 1 — first identified during testing on the panties — may not be the DNA of a single person at all, but, rather, a composite of genetic material from multiple individuals."""
""..In fact, those experts said the evidence showed that the DNA samples recovered from the long johns came from at least two people in addition to JonBenet — something Lacy’s office was told, according to documents obtained by 9NEWS and the Camera, but that she made no mention of in clearing the Ramseys.""
"""The presence of a third person’s genetic markers has never before been publicly revealed."""
"""“It's a rather obvious point, but I mean, if you’re looking for someone that doesn’t exist, BECAUSE IT'S ACTUALLY SEVERAL PEOPLE, it’s a problem,” said Troy Eid, a former U.S. Attorney for Colorado."""'''
wcnc.com/article/news/invest…
""".... they also noted that additional samples of trace DNA found under the victim's fingernails and on the cord and garrotte used in the crime didn't match the long johns DNA or each other. The presence of so many different DNA samples, many of them too tiny or degraded to put into a database or even determine if they came from blood or skin tissues, suggests that JonBenét was killed by a sizable "foreign faction" of sadists — or that police were looking for a suspect who didn't exist."""""
westword.com/news/jonbenet-r…
(As an aside, the only theory in the Ramsey case that ever mentioned multiple people being involved in the murder was our sex ring theory..from Jan 1997...just sayin' 😉)
Again, the question begs to be asked, who benefitted the most from Keenan's misrepresentation?
The Boulder DA's office and Mary Keenan are not the heroes of the Ramsey case....they are actually some of the villains.
To learn more.....
teapawt.org/Frankz2137/status/1863…
teapawt.org/Frankz2137/status/1919…
In the Zellar retweeted
Replying to @SayreBedinger
Why don't the Jets trade Geno Smith to the Vikings? Seems like a no-brainer to me.
In the Zellar retweeted
Replying to @LesleyMiss17638
Not only was the crime scene off....but the town of Boulder was off.
Give these two Ramsey case podcasts a listen.....
teapawt.org/Frankz2137/status/1863…
And..
True Crime Garage Podcast
JonBenet: Poems and Pornography: Part I
youtu.be/7iKS_5m5YQA?si=uKH7…
Part II
youtu.be/SHCivO4_dqU?si=aJXi…
Part III
youtu.be/hJOM0jKITb8?si=7hg3…
In the Zellar retweeted
ENTIRE Scene Was Compromised From The Off.
Very Deliberately IMO.
Hmm..Kinda Exactly Like The #idaho4 Case!!
JonBenét Ramsey's brother reveals clue that could finally solve her murder.
Details: tmz.com/2026/11/05/jonbenet-…
In the Zellar retweeted
3 things Christians should be doing today after the election…
Pray.
Pray for our leaders and a spiritual awakening that no election can produce. (1 Timothy 2:1–2)
Love.
Stand firm in your convictions, but show grace to those who disagree. Political differences should never become an excuse to stop loving our neighbors. (Matthew 5:44)
Proclaim.
Our greatest hope isn't found in Washington. Laws may restrain evil, but only Jesus Christ can save sinners and transform hearts. (Romans 1:16)
The election is over, but our mission hasn't changed. Make disciples. Preach Christ. Live for His glory.
In the Zellar retweeted
Replying to @MarkFusetti
Well, it was kind of assumed he was an informant since Horsch had received unusually light sentences for crimes he had committed.
The big story now, imo, is the 2009 Bucks County DAs Office.
Back when Horsch was arrested in 2009, this is what the former Chief of Police had to say.....
""As part of the investigation, firearms were found," he said. "There were also IDs of various females. There were a few of them. The DA's office took them and were going to follow up. I really don't know what happened after that.""
So now that we know officially that Horsch was a Fed informant, serious questions need to be asked concerning those in charge of the 2009 Bucks County District Attorneys office.
They found female ID's. What did the DAs office do with those ID's? What kind of work did they put in? Were any of those women missing? Did they even bother to find out?
Or did they bury the IDs because Horsch was a federal informant???
Because if they had a chance to stop Horsch in 2009.....but instead chose to help protect Horsch because he was a fed informant....then you really have a big problem. The blood of any woman harmed after 2009 will be on the hands of whoever was in charge at the Bucks County DAs office back then.
Questions definitely need to be asked.
In the Zellar retweeted
Happy about us
Steve Duby (sermon): “The analogy of a parent and child comes to mind, although parent-child analogies inevitably break down at some point when we’re talking about God. Everyone can see the problem when parents have a child in order for the parents to become self-actualized. Maybe dad never became a professional athlete and he is bent on the son becoming one in order to validate dad himself. That’s very different from a parent simply finding joy in the child’s well-being and growth in the likeness of Christ. Now, the analogy breaks down because human parents end up needing something, needing their children to take care of them, whereas God does not. … I had a student one time ask me, ‘But isn’t God better off with us?’ To which I immediately and happily responded, ‘No, we don’t make God any greater or better than he already was.’ Which is good news because we creatures are not sufficient to be an anchor of God’s contentment. Instead, we’re invited to participate in God’s eternally, already established, joy in the fellowship of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. … God is happy *about us* but he is not happy *because of us*, as though we were supposed to be the foundation of his fulfillment and contentment, which is a burden that no creature was ever meant to bear.”
In the Zellar retweeted
JONBENET RAMSEY CASE
THE GRAND JURY-PART III
So let's sum up how events truly played out when it comes to the Ramsey Grand Jury.....
The grand jury started it's work in September 1998
The grand jury finished up in October 1999. There are indictments, but not for murder. There are 4 indictments, two against John Ramsey and two against Patsy. The charges are the same for both parents. 1) Felony Child Abuse- Putting their child in a situation to be harmed or killed. 2) Aiding and abetting the killer in getting away with the crime.
District Attorney Alex Hunter refused to to sign the bill of indictments and to prosecute.
Alex Hunter misled(lied to?) the American public by making it seem that the Grand jury had issued NO Indictments.
The judge issued a lifetime gag order for everyone involved in the grand jury process. This silenced the jurors from speaking out. Anyone in the public who contacted a grand juror faced a contempt of court charge.
The judge placed the indictments under seal, which kept them hidden from the public.
While the indictments were under seal, the statute of limitations on the charges ran out in 2002. Patsy Ramsey died of cancer in 2006.
It took a lawsuit in 2013 to get a judge to release 4 pages from the 18 page Grand jury report. Finally, the public gets to know about the indictments.
----------------------------------------
CERTAIN QUESTIONS TO ASK
1) Why did the Grand Jury indict the way they did? Why no murder charge?
In 1999, the grand jury could have easily indicted one of the parents on a murder charge. Ever hear the expression "a district attorney can get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich?"
The threshold is very low. The grand jury is there to indict, not to prosecute. Problems with DNA?.....that's the DA's problem to figure out when they go to trial. Ransom note was on pages from a notepad that belonged to the Ramseys. Pen used to write ransom note...belonged to the Ramseys. Paintbrush used in making the garrote...belonged to Patsy. Body found in the Ramseys basement.
Plenty enough to indict a parent. But the grand jury didn't do that. They added another person...the killer. Someone the parents aided and abetted in the murder of their child.
What did the Grand Jury hear to make them vote this way?
Which leads to another question........
What is in the other 14 pages of the Grand Jury Report?
Are there any other charges in those still sealed 14 pages? How about names of people other than John and Patsy?
And the final question is a very important question that everyone should ponder......
WHAT WAS THE "SITUATION"?
Look at the Child Abuse charge that John and Patsy were indicted for...and look closely at every word. In the legal world, words matter.......
The Grand Jury stated that John and Patsy did....
""""unlawfully, knowingly, recklessly and feloniously permit a child to be unreasonably placed in a situation which posed a threat to the child's life or health......"""
John and Patsy placed JonBenet in a situation which posed a threat to her.....
""A SITUATION""
The Grand Jury didn't just make things up. They indicted John and Patsy based on what they heard over a year's time investigating this case. Evidence shown to them....people giving testimony.
The Grand Jury didn't indicted John and Patsy for physical child abuse against JonBenet. It was for placing her in a SITUATION that posed a threat to her life.
The Grand Jury didn't indict John and Patsy for murder. They indicted them for helping the killer get away with the crime.
Boulder should release the remaining 14 pages of the Grand Jury Report.
Boulder should let the still living Grand Jury members speak freely about what they learned during their time investigating the Ramsey case.
This is what should happen, but sadly, it probably won't.
Boulder likes this case exactly where it is currently. A soon to be 29 year old mystery.
Welcome to the Ramsey Case. Welcome....to The Boulder Syndrome.
In the Zellar retweeted
Thanks for having us on Frank!!
Don’t miss a deep dive on a developing case in Pennsylvania | A Familiar Rabbit Hole: Predators in High Places - Ft. The Zell Brothers ☕️
youtube.com/live/HUAb5E2JuEo… Likes & Comments help in huge ways. 🙏🏻
In the Zellar retweeted
Vermigli’s prayer on Psalm 150: “When all the things you have made praise you, O almighty God, not only do they do something owed to your dignity and greatness, but they perfect themselves in a rich and wondrous way.”
p160 in davenantinstitute.org/davena…
In the Zellar retweeted
You can love Jesus deeply and still be ashamed of the way you spoke five minutes ago.
You turned toward the sink, knowing your words had landed on someone you love. Long after the plates are washed, one question remains: If Christ lives in me, why did that come out of me?
You meant to honor Him, yet your voice carried the familiar impatience you have confessed so many times before. The distance between your heart and Christ’s feels painfully wide.
Paul gives us a word for such a moment. As we behold the Lord, we “are being transformed into the same image” (2 Corinthians 3:18 NASB).
Being transformed means the work has begun. God sees more than the failure staring back at you tonight. The sorrow you feel does not earn His mercy. It may reveal that the Spirit is uncovering what you once excused and leading you toward repentance.
Jesus knew about that sentence before you spoke it and He saw the wound it would leave. At the cross, He carried its guilt with every other sin belonging to His people. The Savior who forgives you is also changing you, teaching you to answer others with the kindness He has shown you.
If an apology is needed, go give it without defending yourself. Ask the person you wounded to forgive you. Afterward, come to Christ with the shame you cannot scrub away at the kitchen sink.
He will meet you there with mercy already purchased and patience you could never exhaust.
Even here, in the part of yourself you wish they had never seen, you are His.
The sentence cannot be taken back. Christ is still changing the person who said it.
In the Zellar retweeted
Replying to @truecrimegarage
First....the Boulder DA's office (Hunter, Bill Wise AND Mary Keenan) misrepresented (lied) that the 1999 grand jury did not issue any indictments. They ran with with that misrepresentation (lie) for 14 years until a lawsuit forced 4 pages to be released. Those pages stated that there were indictments after all.
Who did this misrepresention (lie) benefit?
In 2008 the Boulder's DA's office, now headed by Keenan, issue a public exoneration of the Ramseys based on DNA.
But guess what? Mary Keenan misrepresented (lie of omission) the facts about the DNA. I guessed she thought misrepresenting the facts worked so well back in 1999, why not try it again.
What facts about the DNA did she mispresent?
Here's some quotes and links.....
"""The DNA profile referred to as Unknown Male 1 — first identified during testing on the panties — may not be the DNA of a single person at all, but, rather, a composite of genetic material from multiple individuals."""
""..In fact, those experts said the evidence showed that the DNA samples recovered from the long johns came from at least two people in addition to JonBenet — something Lacy’s office was told, according to documents obtained by 9NEWS and the Camera, but that she made no mention of in clearing the Ramseys.""
"""The presence of a third person’s genetic markers has never before been publicly revealed."""
"""“It's a rather obvious point, but I mean, if you’re looking for someone that doesn’t exist, BECAUSE IT'S ACTUALLY SEVERAL PEOPLE, it’s a problem,” said Troy Eid, a former U.S. Attorney for Colorado."""'''
wcnc.com/article/news/invest…
""".... they also noted that additional samples of trace DNA found under the victim's fingernails and on the cord and garrotte used in the crime didn't match the long johns DNA or each other. The presence of so many different DNA samples, many of them too tiny or degraded to put into a database or even determine if they came from blood or skin tissues, suggests that JonBenét was killed by a sizable "foreign faction" of sadists — or that police were looking for a suspect who didn't exist."""""
westword.com/news/jonbenet-r…
(As an aside, the only theory in the Ramsey case that ever mentioned multiple people being involved in the murder was our sex ring theory..from Jan 1997...just sayin' 😉)
Again, the question begs to be ask, who benefitted the most from Keenan's misrepresentation?
The Boulder DA's office and Mary Keenan are not the heroes of the Ramsey case....they are actually some of the villains.
To learn more.....
teapawt.org/Frankz2137/status/1919…
teapawt.org/Frankz2137/status/1863…
Join us tonight....to discuss the Ramsey case.
Boulder's Darkest SECRET Could Hold the Key to JonBenét Ramsey's Killer! youtube.com/live/AitWJdT7BYo… via @YouTube
In the Zellar retweeted
This is what will keep the church from going soft.
This is what will solve the spiritual crisis facing our young men and women.
The unflinching proclamation of the gospel is what real strength looks like.
This is what will save America’s sons.
In the Zellar retweeted
Replying to @MegynKellyShow @megynkelly
Hi Megyn....
You may want to some digging into St. John's Episcopal Church and the scandal that took place there in 1999....while the grand jury was still in session.
Child pornography was seized from church grounds. No arrest made, even tho pornography belonged to an individual and the individual was known to BPD and DA's office as early February/March 1997.
And then there were the payoffs from St. John's Church to certain individuals to keep the story silent.
This is the kind of information the public is looking for with this case. Not just new information, but information in which a concerted effort was made to bury it and kept it from going public.
Information that shows that the Boulder DA's office and the Boulder Police worked together to cover for a pedophile caught at one of Boulder's most wealthy and powerful institutions...St. John's Episcopal Church.
You think the public should be allowed to know about this scandal?
In the Zellar retweeted
Replying to @megynkelly
JONBENET RAMSEY
It seems that X is still ablaze with the Epstein file information. And there are still people trying to link Epstein to JonBenet.
Again, if you want to link a sex ring to the murder of JonBenet, you don't have to scour thru the Epstein files to find that information.
26 years ago this month, there were sex ring/child sexual abuse allegations made in this case.
The allegations were levied against John Ramsey, Fleet White Sr and Fleet White Jr...among others.
(For those who don't know, JonBenet and her family were at the home of John's close friend Fleet White Jr the night she died.)
Below are links to the Boulder Police interviews with the woman who made the allegations. For those interested in the allegations made against John Ramsey, you can find them in Part 4...starting around Pg 119.
acandyrose.com/02222000-nanc…
acandyrose.com/02222000-nanc…
acandyrose.com/02222000-nanc…
acandyrose.com/02222000-nanc…
acandyrose.com/02222000-nanc…
acandyrose.com/02222000-nanc…
In the Zellar retweeted
Replying to @megynkelly
JONBENET RAMSEY CASE
THE ENTIRE THREE MEN POEM
BRIEF RECAP:
IN 2000/2001, a Boulder attorney received two anonymous poems in the mail.
In 2003, as the Boulder attorney prepares to leave the country, he sends one poem to me(The Three Men Poem) and the other poem to author Stephen Singular(The Manchurian Doll)
Also in 2003, Detective Lou Smit learns of the existence of Three Men Poem and pleads for a copy. He believes it could be important.
Now, without further ado....
The entire Three Men Poem
(Anything in parentheses is added by me)
"'""This is not the author of the original poem. Recidivism is my only concern. You are the only one who has a copy of this. Please respect my anonymity. People who abuse children are terrorists too.
In the Spirit of Crazy Horse It's all connected......
In his cocky reverie
The truth the three would carry
To the steps of the authority
to boast of their pernicious spree
But he did not know that I could see And therefore was not wary
For hidden in the rectory
Protected by the church decree
He delved in child pornography
While elders professed not to see
His sister told them it could be
He killed the child an honest she
His secret would not bury (Based on true events)
They did not know he'd changed the key
When police would come to query
So they broke and entered quietly Though he would claim illicitly
And so avoiding calumny
A grand sum he was paid to flee
And so it was, conveniently,
Their questions he would parry (based on true events)
To solve a tale of misconstrue
Just look into the offman's pew
You'll find their in Ft. Luptons slough Stray cats aplenty, skinned a few
On prying stoops their hides did strew And cats blood will scare daughters too (based on true events)
While bushes hid their sins from view
Richard held the cue
The child must die, he did decide
The crime arranged, the ritual plyed With church at stake and family pride Three men he chose to end her.....
Though two decried this church a lie Their testimony was denied
With ties that run both deep and wide
No one could defend her
Now some have gone and some have stayed
Class defined the roles they played Someday you'll know the masquerade Of Zack the great pretender
The Three Men
Mervin Pugh- Husband of Linda Hoffman Pugh
**********. Member at St John's Episcopal Church
John Rossi- I only know his name
Zack set it up. Dick called the F.B I.
There are people involved with far more power than Fleet.
****END OF POEM****
For further information, please listen to the True Crime Garage 3 part series....JonBenet: Poems and Pornography
In the Zellar retweeted
Replying to @MrBallen
What everyone missed in the Ramsey case.
People forgot to look at the town!
Give these Ramsey case podcast interviews a listen....
teapawt.org/i/status/1919209372686…
teapawt.org/i/status/1863006346611…
Join us tonight....to discuss the Ramsey case.
Boulder's Darkest SECRET Could Hold the Key to JonBenét Ramsey's Killer! youtube.com/live/AitWJdT7BYo… via @YouTube
In the Zellar retweeted
A man can sit in church for years and still never know the Lord.
He can hear sermons, sing hymns, attend meetings, learn Christian language, quote verses, defend doctrine, serve in ministries, and still remain a stranger to the new birth. Church attendance can surround a man with truth, but it cannot raise a dead soul to life. Only God can do that.
“Unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God” (John 3:3).
This is one of the most terrifying realities in the visible church. Many have become comfortable around holy things without being made holy by God. They are familiar with sermons but unfamiliar with repentance. They know the sound of prayer but not the poverty of spirit. They speak of Christ but do not bow to Him. They have religion in their habits but no resurrection in their hearts.
“Having a form of godliness, although they have denied its power” (2 Timothy 3:5).
The danger is not merely outside the church. The danger is inside the pew, inside the choir, inside the ministry team, inside the pulpit, inside the home that calls itself Christian while the heart remains unchanged. A man may be known by the church and still be unknown by Christ.
“Not everyone who says to Me, Lord, Lord, will enter the kingdom of heaven” (Matthew 7:21).
That should make us tremble. Jesus did not warn atheists only. He warned religious people who used His name, claimed spiritual activity, and yet never belonged to Him. Their mouths were full of ministry, but their lives were full of lawlessness. Their confidence was in what they did for Christ, not in whether they had truly been brought to Christ.
“And then I will declare to them, I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness” (Matthew 7:23).
The new birth is not a mood. It is not a decision card. It is not church culture. It is not being raised in a Christian family. It is not agreeing with Christian morals. It is the supernatural work of God by which a sinner is made alive, given a new heart, brought to repentance, granted faith in Christ, and turned from darkness to light.
“Moreover, I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit within you” (Ezekiel 36:26).
Do not comfort yourself merely because you are near the things of God. Judas was near Christ and perished. The Pharisees searched the Scriptures and rejected the One to whom the Scriptures testified. The Israelites saw mighty works and still hardened their hearts.
“Test yourselves to see if you are in the faith; examine yourselves” (2 Corinthians 13:5).
The question is not, “Have I been in church?” The question is, “Have I been born again?” Do I hate the sin I once protected? Do I love the Christ I once resisted? Do I bow to the Word I once ignored? Do I grieve over my corruption? Do I run to the cross? Do I bear fruit that only grace can produce?
“By this we know that we have come to know Him, if we keep His commandments” (1 John 2:3).
A church seat cannot save you. A Christian family cannot save you. Baptism cannot save you. Ministry cannot save you. Knowledge cannot save you. Morality cannot save you. Only Christ can save sinners, and the man who belongs to Christ will not remain dead in the very sins from which Christ came to deliver him.
“They profess to know God, but by their deeds they deny Him” (Titus 1:16).
So let every churchgoer tremble kindly before God. Let every professing Christian examine himself in the light of Scripture. Let no one hide behind years of attendance while the soul remains untouched by grace.
It is better to be disturbed now than damned later.
It is better to question false peace than to hear Christ say, “I never knew you.”
Religion can place you among the people of God.
Only the new birth can place you in Christ.















