House of Commons Nowcast (20/09/2026) Labour: 325 Conservative: 120 Reform: 77 Lib Dem: 72 SNP: 9 Green: 9 Plaid: 8 Your Party: 7 Independents: 4 Restore: 1 sites.google.com/view/interv…

Lab 30% (+1) Reform 24% (-1) Con 22% (+3) Green 8% (-1) Lib Dem 7% (-1) New Fieldwork: 16th - 19th October 2026 New Sample: 2,092 GB Adults

Sky / Times / YouGov weekly voting intention LAB 27%(+3), CON 23%(nc) RefUK 22%(+1) GRN 10% (-1%) LDEM 11%(-1)

What is each parties best figure right now? 🌹 LAB: 30 ➡️ RFM: 25 🌳 CON: 24 🌍 GRN: 13 🔶 LDM: 12 🔄 RES: 7 🎗️ SNP: 4

In 2024, our party had its greatest election. @EdwardJDavey led us to huge gains. And did it whilst being a decent, caring and thoughtful person in a political world that is often characterised by backstabbing and deceit. He is the right person to take us even further.

THANK YOU ALL THAT VOTED FOR CPA.

PETITION: DEPORT TORY LEADER OLUKEMI OLUFUNTO ADEGOKE 'KEMI' BADENOCH BACK TO NIGERIA FOR PRETENDING TO BE ENGLISH! 🇳🇬 britainfirst.org/deport-kemi…

Zionists struggle to re assert their narrative and control over the Green Party. Zack quietly aligns with the “old”, “traditional” “senior” and “jewish” greens. Apparently the “environmental” greens, the original Tories on bikes are also zionists… thetimes.com/article/e07c15b… “Caroline Lucas, the party’s first MP and former leader, said on Thursday evening Polanski had failed to “show leadership” against the motion, which she described as “flawed from top to bottom” as well as “divisive” and “dangerous”. Pressed on whether he should stand down, Lucas said: “Let’s see what happens in the coming days and weeks”, adding that it was a “mistake” for him not to vote on the Zionism motion On Friday Lucas confirmed she was not calling on Polanski to resign. In a post on X she said: “Today he’s indicated he shares some of my concerns on the Zionism motion and I welcome that. Now the party needs to come together [!] to make the urgent changes [!] needed to take us forward [!] .” Most other senior Greens [!] know the situation is untenable [!], but the question is whether Zack engages with this, shows leadership [!] to try and find a way forward for the party or if he just continues to duck it. They added: “There’s growing determination among traditional Greens, the environmental ones, to wrestle back control [!] of the situation — though everyone knows that will take time.” The leader of the Jewish Greens [!], Vivien Lichtenstein, told Times Radio that Polanski was “absolutely” guilty of a “dereliction of duty” and should resign [!] his leadership. Polanski suggested to the Today programme that he would support the policy being overturned or amended “at the earliest possible opportunity”. [Hear!] He added that he wanted “to see [the Green party] to go back to a process where Israelis and Palestinians decide the future of their region.” [!] The way “Israelis and Palestinians” are currently “deciding the future of the region”: Israel by apartheid, ethnic cleaning, theft and genocide. Palestine by being their victims [preferably not resisting by armed force, presumably. I’m sure Zack would agree that that is “terrorism”!] The principal point is that a “decent” and “acceptable” parliamentary party in Britain must not rock the boat: they must stand with Israel, allow the genocide and looting of the Middle East to continue - so “we” can continue to loot the region of its oil and enslave its people. That is the “traditional” and respectable position of the greens. Obviously!